Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, Volume 223, Issue 3, pp 1295–1302 | Cite as

Matrix-Based Fertilizers Reduce Pesticide Leaching in Soil



The presence of pesticides in groundwater has been documented in several large-scale studies and numerous small-scale investigations. Pesticide leaching through soil has been identified as a major cause for the occurrence of these chemicals in surface and groundwater. We developed matrix-based fertilizers (MBFs) that have been shown to reduce N and P leaching. We tested the efficacy of the ionic bonds in the MBFs to reduce 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), metolachlor, thiophanate methyl, carbaryl, diazinon, and malathion leaching in soil columns. After 7 days 2,4-D, thiophanate methyl, carbaryl, and malathion did not leach in sufficient quantities to determine if the MBF fertilizers reduced leaching compared with the control and the slow-release fertilizer Polyon®. The MBF fertilizers leached from five to 30 times less metolachlor than the control and Polyon® treatment. Treatments with MBF fertilizers leached from two to 72 times less diazinon than the control treatment. The MBF fertilizer treatment leached from eight to 268 less diazinon than columns receiving Polyon®. The MBF formulations allow compounds with both anionic and cationic charges to bind with the Al(SO4)3 3H2O and/or Fe2(SO4)3 3H2O-lignin-cellulose matrix. When pesticides are added to the soil amended with matrix-based fertilizers, the ion exchange matrix will likely bind the metolachlor and diazinon to the Al(SO4)3 3H2O and/or Fe2(SO4)3 3H2O-starch-cellulose-lignin matrix thereby substantially reducing leaching. The MBFs could be used to limit both nutrients and pesticide leaching from agricultural fields.


Matrix-based fertilizers 2,4-D Metolachlor Thiophanate methyl Carbaryl Diazinon Malathion Leaching 


  1. Arshady, R. (1999). In the name of particle formation. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physiochemical Engineering Aspects, 153, 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asrar, J., Ding, Y., La Monica, R. E., & Ness, L. C. (2004). Controlled release of tebuconazole from a polymer matrix microparticle: release kinetics and length of efficacy. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 52, 4814–4820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bacci, E. A., Franchi, Bensi, L., & Gaggi, C. (2008). Calibrating a simple model for ranking the contamination potential. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1, 94–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbash, J.E., Thelin, G.P. Kolpin, D.W. & Gilliom, R.J. (1999). Distribution of major herbicides in ground water of the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4245.Google Scholar
  5. Carrizosa, R. G., Hermosin, M. C., Koskien, W. C., & Cornejo, J. (2004). Use of Organosmectites to reduce leaching losses of acetic herbicides. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 67, 511–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Celis, R. G., Facenda, Hermosin, M. C., & Cornejo, J. (2005). Assessing factors influencing the release of hexazinone from clay-based formulations. International Journal of Environmental and Analytical Chemistry, 85, 1153–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cryer, S. A., & Wilson, S. L. (2009). Modeling approach to assess clustering impact on release rates of pesticides from microencapsulated products. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 57, 5443–5451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Donnelly, P. K., Entry, J. A., Crawford, D. L., & Cromack, K., Jr. (1990). The effect of soil temperature, moisture and acidity on lignin and cellulose decomposition. Microbial Ecology, 20, 289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dowler, C., Dailey, O., & Mullinix, B. (1999). Polymeric microcapsules of alachlor and metolachlor: preparation and evaluation of controlled release properties. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 47, 2908–2913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Entry, J. A., Sojka, R. E., & Hicks, B. J. (2010). Matrix based fertilizers reduce nutrient and bacterial leaching after manure application in a greenhouse column study. Journal of Environmental Quality, 39, 384–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Entry, J. A., & Sojka, R. E. (2010). Matrix-Based fertilizers reduce nutrient leaching while maintaining kentucky bluegrass growth. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 207, 181–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Entry, J. A., & Sojka, R. E. (2009). The influence of form and rate on the efficacy of matrix based fertilizers to reduce nutrient leaching. Applied and Environmental Soil Science, 2009, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Entry, J. A., & Sojka, R. E. (2008). Matrix based fertilizes reduce nitrogen and phosphorus leaching in three soils. Journal of Environmental Management, 87, 364–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Entry, J. A., & Sojka, R. E. (2007). Matrix based fertilizes with arbuscular mycorrhizae reduce nitrogen and phosphorus leaching in greenhouse column studies. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 180, 283–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Entry, J. A., Fuhrmann, J. J., Sojka, R. E., & Shewmaker, G. (2004). Irrigated agriculture impacts soil microbial diversity. Environmental Management, 33, S363–S373.Google Scholar
  16. Entry, J. A., Donnelly, P. K., & Cromack, K., Jr. (1991). Influence of ectomycorrhizal mat soils on lignin and cellulose degradation rates. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 11, 75–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernández-Urrusuno, R., Ginés, J., & Morillo, E. (2000). Development of controlled release formulations of alachlor in ethylcellulose. Journal of Microencapsulation, 17, 331–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Flury, M. (1996). Experimental evidence of transport of pesticides through field soils: a review. Journal of Environmental Quality, 25, 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilliom, J.M., Barbash, J.E., Crawford, C.G., Hamilton, P.A., Martin, J.D., Nakagaki, N., Nowell, L.H., Scott, J.C., Stackelberg P.E., Thelin G.P., & Wolock, D.M. (2006). The quality of our nations waters—pesticides in the Nations streams and ground water 1992–2001. U.S. geological Survey Circular 1291. Available at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/2005/1291/
  20. Grossmann, K. (2007). Auxin herbicide action: lifting the veil step by step. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 2, 421–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haith, D. A., & Rossi, F. S. (2003). Risk assessment of pesticide runoff from turf. Journal of Environmental Quality, 32, 447–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hallberg, G. R. (1989). Pesticide pollution of groundwater in the humid United States. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 26, 299–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kirk, R. E. (1995). Experimental design: procedures for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed., p. 884). Belmont, CA: Brooks Cole Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  24. McLaughlin, R. A., Weaver, J. B., & Warren, R. L. (1997). Protecting groundwater in North Carolina—a pesticide and soil ranking system. North Carolina Cooperative Service Publication AG (pp. 439–31). Raleigh NC: North Carolina University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Okamoto, Y., & Shibamoto, T. (2004). Degradation of malathion, in aqueous extracts of asparagus (Asparagus officinalis). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 22(52), 5919–5923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Phillips, P. J., Ator, S. W., & Nystrom, E. A. (2007). Temporal changes in surface-water insecticide concentrations after the phaseout of diazinon and chlorpyrifos. Environmental Science and Technology, 41, 4246–4251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pothuluri, J. V., Evans, F. E., Doerge, D. R., Churchwell, M. I., & Cerniglia, C. E. (1997). Metabolism of metolachlor by the fungus Cunninghamella elegans. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 32, 117–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shaner, D. L., & Henry, W. B. (2007). Field history and dissipation of atrazine and metolachlor in Colorado. Journal of Environmental Quality, 36, 128–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sojka, R. E., Entry, J. A., & Furhmann, J. J. (2005). The influence of high application rates of polyacrylamide on microbial metabolic potential in an agricultural soil. Applied Soil Ecology, 108, 405–412.Google Scholar
  30. Sopeña, F., Maqueda, C., & Morillo, E. (2007). Norfl urazon mobility, dissipation, activity and persistence in a sandy soil as infl uenced by formulation. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 55, 561–3567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tao, Y., Jiang, X., Bian, Y., Yang, X., & Wang, F. (2009). Transport of malathion in homogeneous soil liquid chromatographic columns: influence of nonequilibrium sorption. Vadose Zone Journal, 8, 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Venkateswarlu, K., Chendrayan, K., & Sethunathan, N. (1980). Persistence and biodegradation of carbaryl in soils. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, 15, 421–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vontor, T., Socha, J., & Vecera, M. (1972). Kinetics and mechanism of hydrolysis of 1-naphthyl. N-Methylcarbamate and NN-dimethylcarbamates. Collection of Czechoslovakian Chemistry Communications, 37, 2183–2196.Google Scholar
  34. Zhang, Q., & Pehkonen, S. O. (1999). Oxidation of diazinon by aqueous chlorine: kinetics, mechanisms, and product studies. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 47, 1760–1766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. (outside the USA) 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.USDA Agricultural Research ServiceNorthwest Irrigation and Soils Research LaboratoryKimberlyUSA
  2. 2.Nurtigrown LCC.ColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations