Advertisement

Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, Volume 223, Issue 2, pp 901–914 | Cite as

Assessing the Use of Magnetic Methods to Monitor Vertical Migration of Metal Pollutants in Soil

  • Birendra SapkotaEmail author
  • Maria T. Cioppa
Article

Abstract

In order to assess the use of magnetic methods to study vertical migration behavior of metal pollutants in natural soils, a controlled experiment was performed near Belle River, Ontario, Canada. The soil at the site consists primarily of clay-rich glacial till overlain by localized alluvium. Twenty PVC tubes (16″ × 8″) were inserted vertically into the ground as test capsules. Magnetite powder (<5 μm) was distributed on the surface of the soil inside ten tubes (10 grams/tube) to simulate anthropogenic contamination, while the other ten were used as controls. While the surficial magnetic susceptibility (MS) remained fairly stable in controls, decreases of 15–60% were observed in contaminated soil tubes. Post-test MS profiles from soil cores in contaminated tubes show that the magnetic signal is strongest at depths between 4 and 6 cm. Magnetic measurements and chemical analysis (using SEM-EDS) on soil layers with enhanced magnetic signal indicate the presence of iron containing particles, likely magnetite. Overall, the results suggest that magnetite powder migrated vertically downwards at a rate of ∼14 cm/year over the four month period, probably as a result of rainwater infiltration. Such magnetic methods and chemical analytical techniques are useful in the investigation of migration of metal pollutants and the potential depth of soil contamination.

Keywords

Pollutant Soil contamination Migration Magnetic susceptibility 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge a Premier’s Research Excellence Award and a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council grant to Dr. Maria T. Cioppa. We would also like to thank Dr. Walter and Mrs. Laura Cassidy who kindly lent their property for this research, and S. Holland, E. Gallaway, and S. Joshi for the field assistance.

References

  1. Alloway, B. J., & Jackson, A. P. (1991). The behavior of heavy metals in sewage sludge-amended soils. The Science of the Total Environment, 100, 151–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Behbahaninia, A., Mirbagheri, S.A. & Javid, A.H. (2008). Heavy metals transport in the soil profiles under the application of sludge and wastewater. In Proceedings of world academy of science, engineering and technology, ISSN 2070–3740, pp. 53–55Google Scholar
  3. Blaha, U., Sapkota, B., Appel, E., Stanjek, H., & Rosler, B. (2008). Micro-scale grain-size analysis and magnetic properties of coal-fired power plant fly ash and its relevance for environmental magnetic pollution studies. Atmospheric Environment, 42(36), 8359–8370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyko, T., Scholger, R., Stanjek, H., & MAGPROX Team. (2004). Topsoil magnetic susceptibility mapping as a tool for pollution monitoring: repeatability of in-situ measurements. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 55, 249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chaparro, M. A. E., Marie, D. C., Gogorza, C. S. G., Navas, A., & Sinito, A. M. (2010). Magnetic studies and scanning electron microscopy-X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy analyses of road sediments, soils and vehicle-derived emissions. Studia Geophysica et Geodaetica, 54, 633–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis, R. D., Carlton-Smith, C. H., Stark, J. H., & Campbell, J. A. (1988). Distribution of metals in grassland soils following surface applications of sewage sludge. Environmental Pollution, 49(2), 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Duan, X. M., Hu, S. Y., Yan, H. T., Blaha, U., Roesler, W., Appel, E., et al. (2010). Relationship between magnetic parameters and heavy element contents of arable soil around a steel company, Nanjing. Science China-Earth Sciences, 53, 411–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Durza, O. (1999). Heavy metals contamination and magnetic susceptibility in soils around metallurgical plant. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth A-Solid Earth and Geodesy, 24(6), 541–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fassbinder, J. W. E., Stanjek, H., & Vali, H. (1990). Occurrence of magnetic bacteria in soil. Nature, 343(11), 161–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gautam, P., Blaha, U., & Appel, E. (2005). Magnetic susceptibility of dust-loaded leaves as a proxy of traffic-related heavy metal pollution in Kathmandu city, Nepal. Atmospheric Environment, 39(12), 2201–2211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giller, K. E., Witter, E., & Mcgrath, S. P. (1998). Toxicity of heavy metals to microorganisms and microbial processes in agricultural soils: a review. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 30(10–11), 1389–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hanesch, M., & Scholger, R. (2002). Mapping of heavy metal loadings in soils by means of magnetic susceptibility measurements. Environmental Geology, 42(8), 857–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanesch, M., Stanjek, H., & Peterson, N. (2006). Thermomagnetic measurements of soil iron minerals: the role of organic carbon. Geophysics Journal International, 165(1), 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hudec, P.P. (1998). Geology and geotechnical properties of glacial soils in Windsor. In P.F. Karrow & O.L. White (Eds.), Urban geology of Canadian cities, GAC Special Publication, 42, pp. 225–236.Google Scholar
  15. Huliselan, E. K., Bijaksana, S., Srigutomo, W., & Kardena, E. (2010). Scanning electron microscopy and magnetic characterization of iron oxides in solid waste landfill leachate. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 179(1–3), 701–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jacques, D., Simunek, J., Mallants, D., & van Genuchten, M. Th. (2008). Modelling coupled water flow, solute transport and geochemical reactions affecting heavy metal migration in a podzol soil. Geoderma, 145, 449–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jarup, L. (2003). Hazards of heavy metal contamination. British Medical Bulletin, 68, 167–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jordanova, D., Hoffmann, V., & Fehr, K. T. (2004). Mineral magnetic characterization of anthropogenic magnetic phases in the Danube river sediments (Bulgarian part). Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 221(1–4), 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kapicka, A., Petrovsky, E., Ustjak, S., & Machackova, K. (1999). Proxy mapping of fly-ash pollution of soils around a coal-burning power plant: a case study in the Czech Republic. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 66, 291–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kapicka, A., Kodesova, R., Petrovsky, E. & Grison, H. (2010). Dynamics of deposited fly-ash and fine grained magnetite in sandy material of different porosity (column experiments). Geophysical Research Abstracts, EGU2010-2356.Google Scholar
  21. Lecoanet, H., Leveque, F., & Ambrosi, J. P. (2003). Combination of magnetic parameters: an efficient way to discriminate soil-contamination sources (south France). Environmental Pollution, 122(2), 229–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li, X., Poon, C., & Liu, P. S. (2001). Heavy metal contamination of urban soils and street dusts in Hong Kong. Applied Geochemistry, 16(11–12), 1361–1368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Magiera, T., Strzyszcz, Z., Kapicka, A., & Petrovsky, E. (2006). Discrimination of lithogenic and anthropogenic influences on topsoil magnetic susceptibility in Central Europe. Geoderma, 130(3–4), 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Magiera, T., Strzyszcz, Z., & Rachwal, M. (2007). Mapping particulate pollution loads using soil magnetometry in urban forests in the Upper Silesia Industrial Region, Poland. Forest Ecology and Management, 248(1–2), 36–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maher, B. A., & Taylor, R. M. (1988). Formation of ultrafine-grained magnetite in soils. Nature, 336(24), 368–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maskall, J., Whitehead, K., & Thornton, I. (1995). Heavy metal migration in soils and rocks at historical smelting sites. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 17(3), 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mullins, C. E. (1977). Magnetic susceptibility of the soil and its significance in soil science: a review. Journal of Soil Science, 28, 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nriagu, J. O. (1990). Global metal pollutions: poisoning the biosphere? Environment, 32(7), 7–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Petrovsky, E., Kapicka, A., Jordanova, N., Knab, M., & Hoffmann, V. (2000). Low-field magnetic susceptibility: a proxy method of estimating increased pollution of different environmental systems. Environmental Geology, 39(3–4), 312–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rousseau, M., Di Pietro, L., Angulo-Jaramillo, R., Tessier, D., & Cabibel, B. (2004). Preferential transport of soil colloidal particles: physicochemical effects on particle mobilization. Vadose Zone Journal, 3, 247–261.Google Scholar
  31. Sapkota, B., Cioppa, M. T., & Gagnon, J. E. (2011). Investigation of the changes in magnetic and chemical properties of soils during plant growth. Environmental Earth Sciences. doi: 10.1007/s12665-011-1099-4.
  32. Schmidt, A., Yarnold, R., Hill, M., & Ashmore, M. (2005). Magnetic susceptibility as proxy for heavy metal pollution: a site study. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 85(3), 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Soil Survey of Essex County, Report No.11 of the Ontario Soil Survey, 1949.Google Scholar
  34. Spiteri, C., Kalinski, V., Rosler, W., Hoffmann, V., Appel, E., & MAGPROX team. (2005). Magnetic screening of a pollution hotspot in the Lausitz area, Eastern Germany: correlation analysis between magnetic proxies and heavy metal contamination in soils. Environmental Geology, 49(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth and Environmental SciencesUniversity of WindsorWindsorCanada

Personalised recommendations