Testing the Feasibility of Using the ForSAFE-VEG Model to Map the Critical Load of Nitrogen to Protect Plant Biodiversity in the Rocky Mountains Region, USA
- 330 Downloads
The ForSAFE-VEG model was used to estimate atmospheric nitrogen deposition and climate effects on soil chemistry and ground vegetation in alpine and subalpine zones of the northern and central Rocky Mountains region in the USA from 1750 to 2500. Model simulations for a generalized site illustrated how the critical load of atmospheric nitrogen deposition could be estimated to protect plant biodiversity. The results appear reasonable compared with past model applications in northern Europe. Atmospheric N deposition critical loads estimated to protect plant biodiversity were 1 to 2 kg N/ha/year. This range could be greater, depending on the values selected for critical site-specific parameters (precipitation, temperature, soil chemistry, plant nutrient uptake, and any eventual harvest of biomass) and the amount of biodiversity change allowed.
KeywordsNitrogen Climate Eutrophication Alpine Vegetation
This study was funded by the National Park Service, Air Resources Division, Denver Colorado, through a contract with E&S Environmental Chemistry, Inc. Vegetation response data for the Rocky Mountains region were provided by the Denver Workshop participants. The participation of Dr. B. Nihlgård was sponsored by the Swedish Critical Loads Programme, funded by the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.
- Achermann, B., & Bobbink, R., eds. (2003). Empirical critical loads for nitrogen. Proceedings of an expert workshop, 11–13 November 2002, Berne. Environmental Documentation No. 164. Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape, Berne. (Similar workshops occurred in 2008 and 2010).Google Scholar
- Barkman, A., Schlyter, P., Lejonklev, M., Alveteg, M., Warfvinge, P., Sverdrup, H., et al. (1999). Uncertainties in high resolution critical load assessment for forest soils—possibilities and constraints of combining distributed soil modelling and GIS. Geographical and Environmental Modelling, 3(2), 125–143.Google Scholar
- Belyazid, S., & Moldan F. (2009). Using ForSAFE-Veg to investigate the feasibility and requirements of setting critical loads for N based on vegetation change, a pilot study at Gårdsjön. IVL report B1875. Göteborg, Sweden.Google Scholar
- E&S Environmental Chemistry, Inc. (2009). Alpine vegetation workshop: Response of alpine and subalpine plant species to changes in atmospheric N deposition. Final report. Corvallis: E&S Environmental Chemistry.Google Scholar
- Economic Commission for Europe (ECE). (2010). Empirical critical loads and dose–response relationships. In Executive Body for the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution. Working Group on Effects, ECE/EB.AIR/WG.1/2010/14.Google Scholar
- Ellenberg, H., Weber, H. E., Dull, R., Wirth, V., Werner, W., & Paulissen, D. (1991). Zeigerwerte der gefasspflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scripta Botanica, 18, 1–248.Google Scholar
- Hettelingh, J. P., Posch, M., Slootweg, J., Bobbink, R., & Alkemade, R. (2008). Tentative dose–response function applications for integrated assessment. In J. P. Hettelingh, M. Posch, & J. Slootweg (Eds.), CCE status report 2008 (p. 89). Bilthoven: Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.Google Scholar
- Landolt, E. (1977). Ökologische Zeigerwerte zur Schweizer Flora. Veröff Geobot Inst ETH Rübel Zürich, 64, 1–208.Google Scholar
- Nilsson, J., & Grennfelt, P. (Eds.). (1988). Critical loads for sulphur and nitrogen. Report 1988:15. Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.Google Scholar
- NRCS (Natural Resources Conservation Service) (2009). U.S. general soil map (STATSGO2). U.S. Department of Agriculture. Available online at http://soildatamart.nrcs.usda.gov. Accessed Feb 05 2009.
- Pachauri, R. K., & Reisinger, A. (Eds.) (2007). Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva: IPCC, pp 104Google Scholar
- Pardo, L. H. (2010). Approaches for estimating critical loads of nitrogen and sulfur deposition for forest ecosystems on U.S. Federal Lands, General Technical Report NRS-71. Newtown Square: USDA Forest Service, Northern Research Station.Google Scholar
- PRISM (Parameter-elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model) (2006). United States average annual precipitation and temperature, 1971–2000. Ashville, NC. Available online at http://www.prism.oregonstate.edu/. Accessed Jan 29 2009.
- Schlutow, A., & Huebener, P. (2004). The BERN model: Bioindication for ecosystem regeneration towards natural conditions. Research report 200 85 221. Berlin: Environmental Research of the Federal Ministry of the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety.Google Scholar
- Sverdrup, H. (1990). Kinetics of base cation release from chemical weathering of silicate minerals. London: Lund University Press–Chartwell-Bratt. 245 pp.Google Scholar
- Sverdrup, H., & Warfvinge, P. (1988a). Assessment of critical loads of acid deposition on forest soils. In J. Nilsson (Ed.), Critical loads for sulphur and nitrogen. Proceedings from the Skokloster Workshop. Nordic Council of Ministers Miljörapport 15 (pp. 81–130). Stockholm: Nordic Council of Ministers and the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (ECE).Google Scholar
- Sverdrup, H., & Warfvinge, P. (1988b). Weathering of primary silicate minerals in the natural soil environment in relation to a chemical weathering model. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 38, 387–408.Google Scholar
- Sverdrup, H., & Warfvinge, P. (1993). The effect of soil acidification on the growth of trees, grass and herbs as expressed by the (Ca + Mg + K)/Al ratio. Reports in Ecology and Environmental Engineering 2:1993. Lund: Chemical Engineering, Lund University.Google Scholar
- Sverdrup, H., Warfvinge, P., & Rosen, K. (1996a). Critical loads of acidity and nitrogen, based on multiple criteria for different Swedish ecosystems. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 85, 2375–2380.Google Scholar
- Sverdrup, H., Belyazid, S., Haraldsson, H., & Nihlgård, B. (2005a). Modelling change in ground vegetation from effects of nutrients, pollution, climate, grazing and land use. In E. Oddsdottir & G. Halldorsson (Eds.), Effects of afforestation on ecosystems, landscape and rural development. Proceedings from a conference held at Reykholt, Iceland, June 20–23, 2005. Andre nordiske publikasjoner, Chapter 1 (pp. 33–43). Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers.Google Scholar
- Sverdrup, H., Martinsson, L., Alveteg, M., Moldan, F., Kronnäs, V., & Munthe, J. (2005b). Modeling recovery of Swedish ecosystems from acidification. Ambio, 34, 25–31.Google Scholar
- Sverdrup, H., Belyazid S., Kurz D. & Braun, S. (2008). Proposed method for estimating critical loads for nitrogen based on biodiversity using a fully integrated dynamic model, with testing in Switzerland and Sweden. In: H. Sverdrup, Towards critical loads for nitrogen based on biodiversity: Exploring a fully integrated dynamic model at test sites in Switzerland and Sweden. Background document for the 18th CCE workshop on the assessment of nitrogen effects under the ICP for Modelling and Mapping, LRTAP Convention (UNECE), Berne, Switzerland, 21–25 April 2008Google Scholar
- Warfvinge, P., Sverdrup, H., Ågren, G., & Rosen, K. (1992). Effekter av luftföroreningar på framtida skogstillväxt. In: L. Svensson (Ed.), Skogspolitiken inför 2000-talet-1990 års skogspolitiska kommitte. Statens Offentliga Utredningar; 1992 SOU (76, pp 377–412).Google Scholar