Advertisement

Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, Volume 222, Issue 1–4, pp 255–269 | Cite as

Tracing Organic Footprints from Industrial Effluent Discharge in Recalcitrant Riverine Chromophoric Dissolved Organic Matter

  • Mikhail BorisoverEmail author
  • Yael Laor
  • Ibrahim Saadi
  • Marcos Lado
  • Nadezhda Bukhanovsky
Article

Abstract

Excitation–emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy, combined with parallel factor analysis and measurements of UV absorption and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) concentrations, was used to trace the footprints of industrial effluents discharged into the lower Kishon River (Israel). The lower Kishon River typifies streams that are affected by seawater tidal intrusion and represents an extreme case of severe long-term pollution caused mainly by a variety of industrial effluents. The industrial effluents may contribute about 90%, in terms of biochemical oxygen demand, of the total organic carbon discharged into the lower Kishon River. Water samples were collected along the river, including the points of effluent discharge from industrial plants, between November 2005 and September 2006. Two types of fluorescent components characterized the fluorescence of the lower Kishon River water: component I corresponded to humic-like matter and component II spectrally resembled material known to be associated with biological productivity, but different from typical tryptophan-like fluorophore. These fluorescent components and other substances that absorbed light at 254 nm contributed to the DOC pool that resisted riverine microbial degradation under laboratory conditions, and that constitutes up to 70% of the overall riverine DOC. The variations in DOC concentration, absorbance at 254 nm, and concentration of humic-like matter (characterized by component I) correlated with the distance from the sea and the water electrical conductivity, and were linked to seawater tidal intrusion. The increased concentration of component II, as well as its enlarged fraction in the overall riverine DOC pool, was found to be associated with the location of major inputs of the industrial effluents. These findings support the use of this fluorescent component as an indicator of industrial pollution in such severely contaminated riverine systems.

Keywords

CDOM Industrial effluent Biodegradation River pollution EEM PARAFAC 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are deeply grateful to the Kishon River Authority for their cooperation and to Mr. Alon Ben-Meir for his help in water sampling. The financial support for this research was provided by the Israel Ministry of Environmental Protection (Project No. 161/03). Valuable comments of two anonymous reviewers are greatly appreciated.

References

  1. Andersen, C. M., & Bro, R. (2003). Practical aspects of PARAFAC modeling of fluorescence excitation–emission data. Journal of Chemometrics, 17, 200–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson, C. A., & Bro, R. (2000). The N-way toolbox for MATLAB. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 52, 1–4 (http://www.models.kvl.dk/source/nwaytoolbox/).
  3. Baker, A. (2001). Fluorescence excitation–emission matrix characterization of some sewage-impacted rivers. Environmental Science & Technology, 35, 948–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker, A. (2002). Fluorescence excitation–emission matrix characterization of river waters impacted by a tissue mill effluent. Environmental Science & Technology, 36, 1377–1382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker, A. (2005). Fluorescence tracing of diffuse landfill leachate contamination in rivers. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 163, 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baker, A., & Curry, M. (2004). Fluorescence of leachates from three contrasting landfills. Water Research, 38, 2605–2613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker, A., & Inverarity, R. (2004). Protein-like fluorescence intensity as a possible tool for determining river water quality. Hydrological Processes, 18, 2927–2945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borisover, M., Laor, Y., Parparov, A., Bukhanovsky, N., & Lado, M. (2009). Spatial and seasonal patterns of fluorescent organic matter in Lake Kinneret (Sea of Galilee) and its catchment basin. Water Research, 43, 3104–3116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bro, R. (1997). PARAFAC: Tutorial and applications. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 38, 149–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, W., Westerhoff, P., Leenheer, J. A., & Booksh, K. (2003). Fluorescence excitation–emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter. Environmental Science & Technology, 37, 5701–5710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coble, P. G. (1996). Characterization of marine and terrestrial DOM in seawater using excitation emission matrix spectroscopy. Marine Chemistry, 51, 325–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coble, P. G. (2007). Marine optical biogeochemistry: The chemistry of ocean color. Chemical Reviews, 107, 402–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coble, P. G., Del Castillo, C. E., & Avril, B. (1998). Distribution and optical properties of CDOM in the Arabian Sea during the 1995 Southwest Monsoon. Deep Sea Research. Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 45, 2195–2223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, Y., Kress, N., & Hornung, H. (1993). Organic and trace-metal pollution in the sediments of the Kishon River (Israel) and possible influence on the marine environment. Water Science and Technology, 27, 439–447.Google Scholar
  15. Fellman, J. B., D’Amore, D. V., Hood, E., & Boone, R. D. (2008). Fluorescence characteristics and biodegradability of dissolved organic matter in forest and wetland soils from coastal temperate watersheds in southeast Alaska. Biogeochemistry, 88, 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Galapate, R. P., Baes, A. U., Ito, K., Mukai, T., Shoto, E., & Okada, M. (1998). Detection of domestic wastes in Kurose River using synchronous fluorescence spectroscopy. Water Research, 32, 2232–2239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gauthier, T. D., Shane, E. C., Guerin, W. F., Seitz, W. R., & Grant, C. L. (1986). Fluorescence quenching method for determining equilibrium constants for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons binding to dissolved humic materials. Environmental Science & Technology, 20, 1162–1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hall, G. J., Clow, K. E., & Kenny, J. E. (2005). Estuarial fingerprinting through multidimensional fluorescence and multivariate analysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 39, 7560–7567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hayes, M. H. B., & Malcolm, R. L. (2001). Considerations of composition and of aspects of the structures of humic substances. In C. E. Clapp, M. H. B. Hayes, N. Senesi, P.R. Bloom, P. M. Jardine (Eds). Humic substances and chemical contaminants (pp. 3–39). SSSA, Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Henderson, R. K., Baker, A., Murphy, K. R., Hambly, A., Stuetz, R. M., & Khan, S. J. (2009). Fluorescence as a potential monitoring tool for recycled water systems: A review. Water Research, 43, 863–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Her, N., Amy, G., McKnight, D., Sohn, J., & Yoon, Y. (2003). Characterization of DOM as a function of MW by fluorescence EEM and HPLC-SEC using UVA, DOC, and fluorescence detection. Water Research, 37, 4295–4303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Herut, B., & Kress, N. (1997). Particulate metals contamination in the Kishon River estuary, Israel. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 34, 706–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holbrook, R. D., Breidenich, J., & DeRose, P. C. (2005). Impact of reclaimed water on select organic matter properties of a receiving stream fluorescence and perylene sorption behavior. Environmental Science & Technology, 39, 6453–6460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hudson, N., Baker, A., & Reynolds, D. (2007). Fluorescence analysis of dissolved organic matter in natural, waste and polluted waters—A review. River Research and Applications, 23, 631–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hudson, N., Baker, A., Ward, D., Reynolds, D. M., Brunsdon, C., Carliell-Marquet, C., et al. (2008). Can fluorescence spectrometry be used as a surrogate for the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) test in water quality assessment? An example from South West England. Science of the Total Environment, 391, 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Israel Water Commission. (2007). Hydrological annual survey report, 2005/06. Jerusalem, Israel (in Hebrew): Water Commission, Hydrological Service.Google Scholar
  27. Israel Water Commission. (2008). Hydrological annual survey report, 2006/07. Jerusalem, Israel (in Hebrew): Water Commission, Hydrological Service.Google Scholar
  28. KRA (Kishon River Authority) (2006). Report. http//www.kishon.org.il (in Hebrew).
  29. Krumgalz, B. (1993). “Fingerprints” approach to the identification of anthropogenic trace metal sources in the nearshore and estuarine environments. Estuaries, 16, 488–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kumke, M. U., Zwiener, C., Abbt-Braun, G., & Frimmel, F. H. (1999). Spectroscopic characterization of fulvic acid fractions of a contaminated groundwater. Acta Hydrochimica et Hydrobiologica, 27, 409–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lakowicz, J. R. (1999). Principles of fluorescence spectroscopy (2nd ed.). New York: Kluwer/Plenum.Google Scholar
  32. Marschner, B., & Kalbitz, K. (2003). Controls of bioavailability and biodegradability of dissolved organic matter in soils. Geoderma, 113, 211–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mobed, J. J., Hemmingsen, S. L., Autry, J. L., & McGown, L. B. (1996). Fluorescence characterization of IHSS humic substances: Total luminescence spectra with absorbance correction. Environmental Science & Technology, 30, 3061–3065.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moran, M. A., Sheldon, W. M., & Zepp, R. G. (2000). Carbon loss and optical property change during long-term photochemical and biological degradation of estuarine organic matter. Limnology and Oceanography, 45, 1254–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mostofa, K. M. G., Yoshioka, T., Konohira, E., & Tanoue, E. (2007). Photodegradation of fluorescent dissolved organic matter in river waters. Geochemical Journal, 41, 323–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mostofa, K. M. G., Wu, F., Liu, C.-Q., Fang, W. L., Yuan, J., Ying, W. L., et al. (2010). Characterization of Nanming River (southwestern China) sewerage-impacted pollution using an excitation–emission matrix and PARAFAC. Limnology, 11, 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ohno, T., & Bro, R. (2006). Dissolved organic matter characterization using multiway spectral decomposition of fluorescence landscapes. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 70, 2028–2037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Oren, A., Aizenshtat, Z., & Chefetz, B. (2006). Persistent organic pollutants and sedimentary organic matter properties: A case study in the Kishon River, Israel. Environmental Pollution, 141, 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Richter, E. D., Friedman, L. S., Tamir, Y., Berman, T., Levy, O., Westin, J. B., et al. (2003). Cancer risks in naval divers with multiple exposures to carcinogens. Environmental Health Perspectives, 111, 609–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Saadi, I., Borisover, M., Armon, R., & Laor, Y. (2006). Monitoring of effluent DOM biodegradation using fluorescence, UV and DOC measurements. Chemosphere, 63, 530–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sheng, G.-P., & Yu, H.-Q. (2006). Characterization of extracellular polymeric substances of aerobic and anaerobic sludge using three-dimensional excitation and emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy. Water Research, 40, 1233–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stedmon, C. A., Markager, S., & Bro, R. (2003). Tracing dissolved organic matter in aquatic environments using a new approach to fluorescence spectroscopy. Marine Chemistry, 82, 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vivian, J. T., & Callis, P. R. (2001). Mechanisms of tryptophan fluorescence shifts in proteins. Biophysical Journal, 80, 2093–2109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wu, F. C., Kothawala, D. N., Evans, R. D., Dillon, P. J., & Cai, Y. R. (2007). Relationships between DOC concentration, molecular size and fluorescence properties of DOM in a stream. Applied Geochemistry, 22, 1659–1667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yacobi, Y. Z., Alberts, J. J., Takacs, M., & McElvaine, M. (2003). Absorption spectroscopy of colored dissolved organic carbon in Georgia (USA) rivers: The impact of molecular size distribution. Journal of Limnology, 62, 41–46.Google Scholar
  46. Yamashita, Y., & Tanoue, E. (2003). Chemical characterization of protein-like fluorophores in DOM in relation to aromatic amino acids. Marine Chemistry, 82, 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zhang, Y., Qin, B., Zhu, G., Zhang, L., & Yang, L. (2007). Chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) absorption characteristics in relation to fluorescence in Lake Taihu, China, a large shallow subtropical lake. Hydrobiologia, 581, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mikhail Borisover
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yael Laor
    • 2
  • Ibrahim Saadi
    • 2
  • Marcos Lado
    • 3
  • Nadezhda Bukhanovsky
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, the Volcani CenterBet DaganIsrael
  2. 2.Institute of Soil, Water and Environmental Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya’ar Research CenterRamat YishayIsrael
  3. 3.Area of Soil Science, Faculty of SciencesUniversity of A CoruñaA CoruñaSpain

Personalised recommendations