Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, Volume 221, Issue 1–4, pp 351–363 | Cite as

Natural Attenuation of Zn, Cu, Pb and Cd in Three Biosolids-Amended Soils of Contrasting pH Measured Using Rhizon Pore Water Samplers

  • Ghulam Murtaza
  • Richard John Haynes
  • Ravindra Naidu
  • Oxana N. Belyaeva
  • Kwon-Rae Kim
  • Dane T. Lamb
  • Nanthi S. Bolan
Article

Abstract

The effects of application of biosolids, at four rates, to an alkaline (pH 8.4), neutral (pH 7.0) and acidic (pH 4.0) soil on concentrations of Cu, Zn, Pb, Cd and dissolved organic C in soil solution were measured over a 170-day period in a laboratory incubation study using Rhizon pore water samplers. Applications of biosolids decreased solution pH in the alkaline soil, increased it in the acidic soil and had little effect in the neutral soil. In general, increasing application rates of biosolids progressively increased EC and concentrations of dissolved organic C (DOC), Cu, Zn, and to a lesser extent Cd and Pb, in soil solution. Concentrations of DOC and concentrations of solution Cu, Zn, and to a lesser extent solution Cd and Pb, decreased over the incubation period. In all three soils, concentrations of solution Cu and Zn were closely positively correlated with DOC concentrations and similar positive but weaker correlations were found for solution Cd and Pb. For the alkaline and neutral soils, concentrations of solution Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb were generally negatively correlated with solution pH but for the acidic soil, positive correlations for Cu and Zn were recorded. The percentage reduction in solution Cu and Zn, between 0 and 170 days incubation, increased with increasing rates of biosolids in the acid soil (where biosolids applications increased pH) but the reverse was the case for the alkaline soil (where pH fell following biosolids applications). Greatest percentage reduction in soluble Cu and Zn occurred in the neutral soil which had the greatest BET surface area, clay and organic matter contents and therefore the greatest capacity to adsorb heavy metal cations. It was concluded that solution pH, dissolved organic C and the intrinsic capacity of the soil to remove metals from solution, were the main factors interacting to regulate heavy metal cation solubility in the biosolids-amended soils.

Keywords

Biosolids Zn Cu Pb Cd Soil pH Dissolved organic C 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author thanks the Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan for funding of his Post-Doctoral position. We are also grateful to the University of South Australia and CRC CARE for providing facilities for this research.

References

  1. Alloway, B. J., & Jackson, A. P. (1991). The behaviour of heavy metals in sewage sludge-amended soils. The Science of the Total Environment, 100, 151–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antoniadis, V., Tsadilas, C. D., & Stamatiadis, S. (2007). Effect of dissolved organic carbon on zinc solubility in incubated biosolids-amended soils. Journal of Enviromental Quality, 36, 379–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashworth, D. J., & Alloway, B. J. (2008). Influence of dissolved organic matter on the solubility of heavy metals in sewage sludge-amended soils. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 39, 538–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Basta, N. T., Ryan, J. A., & Chaney, R. L. (2005). Trace element chemistry in residual-treated soil: key concepts and metal bioavailablity. Journal of Environmental Quality, 34, 49–63.Google Scholar
  5. Bertoncini, E. I., D’Orazio, V., Senesi, N., & Mattiazzo, M. E. (2005). Fluorescence analysis of humic and fulvic acids from two Brazilian oxisols as affected by biosolid amendment. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 381, 1281–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolan, N. S., Adriano, D., Senesi, N., Kunhikrishnan, A., James, T., & McDowell, R. (2011). Dissolved organic carbon: biogeochemistry, dynamics and agro-environmental significance in soils. Advances in Agronomy 105 (in press).Google Scholar
  7. Brunauer, S., Emmett, P. H., & Teller, E. (1938). Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 60, 309–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), South Australia. (2009). South Australian guidelines for safe handling and reuse of biosolids. South Australia: Adelaide, EPA.Google Scholar
  9. Epstein, E. (2003). Land application of sewage sludge and biosolids. Boca Raton: Lewis.Google Scholar
  10. Fares, A., Deb, S. K., & Fares, S. (2009). Review of vadose zone soil solution sampling techniques. Environmental Reviews, 17, 215–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fernandes, S. A. P., Bettiol, W., & Cerri, C. C. (2005). Effect of sewage sludge on microbial biomass, basal respiration, metabolic quotient and soil enzymatic activity. Applied Soil Ecology, 30, 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Garcia, C., Hernandez, T., & Costa, F. (1991). Changes in carbon fractions during composting and maturation of organic wastes. Environmental Management, 15, 433–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haynes, R. J. (2005). Labile organic matter fractions as central components of the quality of agricultural soils: an overview. Advances in Agronomy, 85, 221–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haynes, R. J., Murtaza, G., & Naidu, R. (2009). Inorganic and organic constituents and contaminants of biosolids: implications for land application. Advances in Agronomy, 104, 165–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hooda, P. S., & Alloway, B. J. (1993). Effects of time and temperature on the bioavailability of Cd and Pb from sludge-amended soils. Journal of Soil Science, 44, 97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Isbell, R. F. (2002). The Australian soil classification. Victoria: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. Jaynes, W. F., & Zartman, R. E. (2005). Origin of talc, iron phosphates and other minerals in biosolids. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 69, 1047–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Khaleel, R., Reddy, K. R., & Overcash, M. R. (1981). Changes in soil physical properties due to organic waste applications: a review. Journal of Environmental Quality, 10, 133–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kipton, H., Powell, J., & Town, R. M. (1992). Solubility and fractionation of humic acid; effect of pH and ionic medium. Analytica Chimica Acta, 267, 47–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Knight, B. P., Chaudri, A. M., McGrath, S. P., & Giller, K. E. (1998). Determination of chemical availability of cadmium and zinc in soils using inert soil moisture samplers. Environmental Pollution, 99, 293–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lamy, I., Bourgeois, S., & Bernmond, A. (1993). Soil cadmium mobility as a consequence of sewage sludge disposal. Journal of Environmental Quality, 22, 731–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li, Z., Ryan, J. A., Chen, J. L., & Al-Abed, S. R. (2001). Adsorption of cadmium on biosolids-amended soils. Journal of Environmental Quality, 30, 903–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lombi, E., Hamon, R. E., McGrath, S. P., & McLaughlin, M. J. (2003). Lability of Cd, Cu, and Zn in polluted soils treated with lime beringite, and red mud and identification of a non-labile colloidal fraction of metals using isotopic techniques. Environmental Science & Technology, 37, 979–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ma, Y., Lombi, E., Oliver, I. W., Nolan, A. L., & McLaughlin, M. J. (2006). Long-term aging of copper added to soils. Environmental Science & Technology, 40, 6310–6317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McBride, M. B. (2000). Chemisorption and precipitation reactions. In M. E. Sumner (Ed.), Handbook of soil science (pp. B265–B302). Boca Raton: CRC.Google Scholar
  26. McBride, M. B., Richards, B. K., Steenhuis, T., Ruiso, J. J., & Sauve, S. (1997). Mobility and solubility of toxic metals and nutrients in soil fifteen years after sludge application. Soil Science, 162, 487–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. McBride, M. B., Richards, B. K., Steenhuis, T., & Spiers, G. (1999). Long-term leaching of trace elements in a sludge-amended silty clay loam. Soil Science, 164, 613–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McLaughlin, M. J., Zarcinas, B. A., Stevens, D. P., & Cook, N. (2000). Soil testing for heavy metals. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 31, 1661–1700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meijboom, F., & van Noordwijk, M. (1991). Rhizon soil solution samplers as artificial roots. In: Kutschera, L., Huebl, E., Lichtenegger, E., Persson, H., & Sobotnik, M. (Eds.), Root Ecology and its Practical Application, 3 ISRR Symposium Verein fur Wurzelforschung, A-9020 (pp. 793–795). Kagenfurt, Austria.Google Scholar
  30. Miller, W. P., & Miller, D. M. (1987). A micro-pipette method for soil mechanical analysis. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 18, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rayment, G. E., & Higginson, F. R. (1992). Australian laboratory handbook of soil and water chemical methods. Melbourne: Inkata.Google Scholar
  32. Sastre, J., Sahuquillo, A., Vidal, M., & Rauret, G. (2002). Determination of Cd, Cu, Pb and Zn in environmental samples: microwave-assisted total digestion versus aqua regia and nitric acid extraction. Analytica Chimica Acta, 462, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schwab, P., Zhu, D., & Banks, M. K. (2007). Heavy metal leaching from mine tailings as affected by organic amendments. Bioresource Technology, 98, 2935–2941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sigfusson, B., Paton, G. I., & Gislason, S. R. (2006). The impact of sampling techniques on soil pore water carbon measurements of an Icelandic Histic Andosol. The Science of the Total Environment, 369, 203–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Smith, S. R. (1996). Agricultural recycling of sewage sludge and the environment. Wallingford: CAB International.Google Scholar
  36. Sommers, L. E. (1977). Chemical composition of sewage sludges and analysis of their potential use as fertilizers. Journal of Environmental Quality, 6, 225–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sparks, D. L. (2003). Environmental soil chemistry (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Academic.Google Scholar
  38. Stevenson, F. J. (1994). Humus chemistry, genesis, composition, reactions. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Tiensing, T., Preston, S., Strachan, N., & Paton, G. I. (2001). Soil solution extraction techniques for microbial ecotoxicology testing: a comparative evaluation. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 3, 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Toribio, M., & Romanya, J. (2006). Leaching of heavy metals (Cu, Ni and Zn) and organic matter after sewage sludge application to Mediterranean forest soils. The Science of the Total Enviroment, 363, 11–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tye, A. M., Young, S. D., Crout, N. M. J., Zhang, H., Preston, S., Barbosa-Jefferson, V. L., et al. (2003). Predicting ther activity of Cd2+ and Zn2+ in soil pore water from the radio-labile metal fraction. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 67, 375–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. USEPA. (2005). Test methods for evaluating solid waste, physical/chemical methods, SW-846. Washington DC: U S Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  43. Yong, R. N., & Mulligan, C. N. (2003). Natural attenuation of contaminants in soils. Boca Raton: Lewis.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ghulam Murtaza
    • 1
    • 2
  • Richard John Haynes
    • 3
  • Ravindra Naidu
    • 1
  • Oxana N. Belyaeva
    • 3
  • Kwon-Rae Kim
    • 1
  • Dane T. Lamb
    • 1
  • Nanthi S. Bolan
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Environmental Risk Assessment and Remediation, Division of Information Technology, Engineering and the EnvironmentUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Institute of Soil and Environmental SciencesUniversity of AgricultureFaisalabadPakistan
  3. 3.School of Land, Crop and Food Sciences/CRC CAREThe University of QueenslandSt. LuciaAustralia

Personalised recommendations