Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, Volume 219, Issue 1–4, pp 251–261 | Cite as

Mercury Cycling in an Urbanized Watershed: The Influence of Wind Distribution and Regional Subwatershed Geometry in Central Indiana, USA

  • Carrie Lynne Hatcher
  • Gabriel Michael Filippelli
Article

Abstract

The global cycle of mercury (Hg) is reasonably well-understood, as are some of the natural and anthropogenic sources of Hg to the atmosphere. Less well understood are the regional and local characteristics of Hg deposition and subsequent watershed-scale transport, important parameters for assessing human risk to various avenues of Hg exposure. This study employed a two-part strategy for understanding coupled deposition and transport processes in central Indiana (USA), including Indianapolis, a typical large city with multiple coal-fired electric utilities and other Hg emission sources. A spatial analysis of Hg concentrations in surface soils revealed elevated Hg proximal to many of the large emission sources, with a distribution aligned along a southwest-northeast axis corresponding to the mean wind direction in this region. This soil distribution suggests some local depositional impact from local utilities, with wind modification affecting the regional pattern. Post-depositional transport of Hg was assessed using a series of streambank sampling arrays as the White River and various tributaries travelled through the urban core of Indianapolis. Streambank sediments had peak Hg concentrations in the urban core, where several local sources are present and where a number of subwatersheds join the main trunk of the White River, suggesting local emission and/or rapid Hg transport from urban subwatersheds due to their relatively high proportion of impervious surfaces. High Hg values persist in White River sediments into rural areas tens of kilometers south of Indianapolis, raising concerns for anglers collecting fish in this apparently “pristine” environment.

Keywords

Mercury Urban geochemistry Airborne transport Power generation Riparian Watershed 

References

  1. Driscoll, C., Han, Y., Chen, C., Evers, D. L., Holsen, K., et al. (2007). Mercury contamination in forest and freshwater ecosystems in the northeastern United States. Bioscience, 57, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Eckley, C. S., Branfireun, B., Diamond, M., Metre, V., Pl, C., & Heitmuller, F. (2008). Atmospheric mercury accumulation and washoff processes on impervious urban surfaces. Atmospheric Environment, 42(32), 7429–7438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Economic Census (2008). http://www.census.gov/econ/census07. Accessed 23 Feb 2010.
  4. Ellenhorn, M. J., Schonwald, S., Ordog, G., & Wasserberger, J. (1997). Metals and related compounds: Diagnosis and treatment of human poisoning (pp. 1589–1599). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  5. Evers, D. C., Han, Y., Driscoll, C. T., Kamman, N. C., Goodale, M. W., Lambert, K. F., et al. (2007). Biological mercury hotspots in the northeastern United States and toutheastern Canada. Bioscience, 57(1), 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Foster, S., Chrostowski, P. C., & Preziosi, D. V. (2003). Comparison of two mercury environmental fate and transport models in evaluating incinerator emissions. http://www.cpfassociates.com/publications.html.
  7. Grandjean, P. (1997). Cognitive deficit in 7-year-old children with prenatal exposure to methylmercury. Neurotoxicology and Teratology, 19(6), 417–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gray, H. H., Ault, C. H., & Keller, S. J., (1987). Bedrock geologic map of Indiana: Indiana Geological Survey. Miscellaneous Map 48.Google Scholar
  9. Gray, J. E., Theodorakos, P. M., Bailey, E. A., & Turner, R. R. (2000). Distribution, speciation, and transport of mercury in stream-sediment, stream-water, and fish collected near abandoned mercury mines in Southwestern Alaska, USA. The Science of the Total Environment, 260(1–3), 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hatcher, C. (2009). Mercury distribution in soils and stream sediments of central Indiana, USA. MS Thesis, Indiana University.Google Scholar
  11. Li, Z.-G., Feng, X., Liang, L., Tang, S.-L., Wang, S.-F., Fu, X.-W., et al. (2010). Emissions of air-borne mercury from five municipal solid waste landfills in Guiyang and Wuhan, China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10, 3353–3364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Macalady, J. L. (2000). Sediment microbial community structure and mercury methylation in mercury-polluted Clear Lake, California. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66(4), 1479–1488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mason, R. P. (1994). The biogeochemical cycling of elemental mercury: anthropogenic influences. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 58(15), 3191–3198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mason, R. P., Rolfhus, K. R., & Fitzgerald, W. F. (1995). Methylated and elemental mercury cycling in surface and deep ocean waters of the North Atlantic. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 80, 665–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mastalerz, M., Hower, J. C., Drobniak, A., Mardon, S. M., & Lisa, G. (2004). From in-situ coal to fly ash: study of coal mines and power plants from Indiana. International Journal of Coal Geology, 59, 153–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Neumann, K., & Bonzongo, J. C. (2005). Mercury in the Wabash River, Indiana: a preliminary assessment. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 69(10), A708.Google Scholar
  17. Neumann, K., Lyons, W. B., Graham, E. Y., & Callender, E. (2005). Historical backcasting of metal concentrations in the Chattahoochee River, Georgia: population growth and environmental policy. Applied Geochemistry, 20, 2315–2324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ramírez, R., Ramos, J. F. F., Angélica, R. S., & Brabo, E. S. (2003). Assessment of Hg-contamination in soils and stream sediments in the mineral district of Nambija, Ecuadorian Amazon (example of an impacted area affected by artisanal gold mining). Applied Geochemistry, 18, 371–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Renzoni, A., Zino, F., & Franchi, E. (1998). Mercury levels along the food chain and risk for exposed populations. Environmental Research, 77, 68–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Risch, M. R. (2007). Mercury in precipitation in Indiana, January 2001–December 2003: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5063, 76.Google Scholar
  21. Rutter, A. P., Schauer, J. J., Lough, G. C., Snyder, D. C., Kolb, C. J., Von Klooster, S., et al. (2008). A comparison of speciated atmospheric mercury at an urban center and an upwind rural location. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 10(1), 102–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Seigneur, C., Vijayaraghavan, K., & Lohman, P. (2004). Global source attribution for mercury deposition in the United States. Environmental Science & Technology, 38(2), 2555–2269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Skyllberg, U., Qian, Frech, J. W., Xia, K., & Bleam, W. (2003). Distribution of mercury, methyl mercury and organic sulphur species in soil, soil solution and stream of a boreal forest catchment. Biogeochemistry, 64(1), 53–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sloan, J. J., Dowdy, R. H., Balogh, S. J., & Nater, E. (2001). Distribution of mercury in soil and its concentration in runoff from a biosolids-amended agricultural watershed. Journal of Environmental Quality, 30, 2173–2179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sorensen, J. A., Kallemeyn, L. W., & Sydor, M. (2005). Relationship between mercury accumulation in young-of-the-wear Yellow Perch and water-level fluctuations. Environmental Science & Technology, 39, 9237–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sturm, A. G. (1978). Soil survey of Marion County, Indiana: Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of Agriculture. Indianapolis, Soil Conservation Service 63.Google Scholar
  27. Sweet, L. L., & Zelikoff, J. (2004). Toxicology and immunotoxicology of mercury: a comparative review in fish and humans. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, B(4), 161–205.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carrie Lynne Hatcher
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gabriel Michael Filippelli
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Earth SciencesIndiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI)IndianapolisUSA
  2. 2.Department of GeographyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations