Acidification and Prognosis for Future Recovery of Acid-Sensitive Streams in the Southern Blue Ridge Province
- 141 Downloads
This study applied the Model of Acidification of Groundwater in Catchments (MAGIC) to estimate the sensitivity of 66 watersheds in the Southern Blue Ridge Province of the Southern Appalachian Mountains, United States, to changes in atmospheric sulfur (S) deposition. MAGIC predicted that stream acid neutralizing capacity (ANC) values were above 20 μeq/L in all modeled watersheds in 1860. Hindcast simulations suggested that the median historical acidification of the modeled streams was a loss of about 25 μeq/L of ANC between 1860 and 2005. Although the model projected substantial changes in soil and stream chemistry since pre-industrial times, simulated future changes in response to emission controls were small. Results suggested that modeled watersheds would not change to a large degree with respect to stream ANC or soil % base saturation over the next century in response to a rather large decrease in atmospheric S deposition. Nevertheless, the magnitude of the relatively small simulated future changes in stream and soil chemistry depended on the extent to which S emissions are reduced. This projection of minimal recovery in response to large future S emissions reductions is important for designing appropriate management strategies for acid-impacted water and soil resources. Exploratory analyses were conducted to put some of the major modeling uncertainties into perspective.
KeywordsSulfur Atmospheric deposition Base cation Acidification Modeling
This research was funded by a contract from the U.S. Forest Service, Southern Research Station, to E&S Environmental Chemistry, Inc. Interpolated wet deposition estimates were provided by J. Grimm. This manuscript has not been subjected to agency review, and no official endorsement is implied.
- Bulger, A. J., Cosby, B. J., Dolloff, C. A., Eshleman, K. N., Webb, J. R., Galloway, J. N. (1999). SNP:FISH. Shenandoah National Park: fish in sensitive habitats. project final report—Vol. II. stream water chemistry and discharge, and synoptic water quality surveys. Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.Google Scholar
- Byun, D. W., & Ching, J. K. S. (1999). Science algorithms of the EPA Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system, EPA/600/R-99/030. Washington, DC: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development.Google Scholar
- Cosby, B. J., Hornberger, G. M., Ryan, P. F., & Wolock, D. M. (1989). MAGIC/DDRP final report, project completion report. Corvallis, OR: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Direct/Delayed Response Project.Google Scholar
- Elliott, K. J., Vose, J. M., Knoepp, J. D., Johnson, D. W., Swank, W. J., & Jackson, W. (2008). Simulated effects of altered atmospheric sulfur deposition on nutrient cycling in Class I Wilderness Areas in western North Carolina. Journal of Environmental Quality, 37, 1419–1431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Grimm, J. W., & Lynch, J. A. (1997). Enhanced wet deposition estimates using modeled precipitation inputs. Final report to the USDA Forest Service, Northeast Forest Experiment Station, Northern Global Change Research Program (23–721).Google Scholar
- National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program (NAPAP). (1991). Integrated assessment report. Washington, DC: National Acid Precipitation Assessment Program.Google Scholar
- Shannon, J. D. (1998). Calculation of trends from 1900 through 1990 for sulfur and NO x -N deposition concentrations of sulfate and nitrate in precipitation, and atmospheric concentrations of SO x and NO x species over the Southern Appalachians. April: Report to SAMI. 1998.Google Scholar
- Sullivan, T. J., & Cosby, B. J. (2002). Critical loads of sulfur deposition to protect streams within Joyce Kilmer and Shining Rock Wilderness areas from future acidification. Report prepared for USDA Forest Service, Asheville, NC. Corvallis, OR: E&S Environmental Chemistry, Inc.Google Scholar
- Sullivan, T. J., & Cosby, B. J. (2004). Aquatic critical load development for the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia. Report Prepared for USDA Forest Service, Monongahela National Forest, Elkins, WV. Corvallis, OR: E&S Environmental Chemistry, Inc.Google Scholar
- Sullivan, T. J., Cosby, B. J., Webb, J. R., Snyder, K. U., Herlihy, A. T., Bulger, A. J., et al. (2002a). Assessment of the effects of acidic deposition on aquatic resources in the Southern Appalachian Mountains. Report prepared for the Southern Appalachian Mountains Initiative (SAMI). Corvallis, OR: E&S Environmental Chemistry, Inc.Google Scholar
- Sullivan, T. J., Johnson, D. W., & Munson, R. (2002b). Assessment of effects of acid deposition on forest resources in the Southern Appalachian Mountains. Report prepared for the Southern Appalachian Mountains Initiative (SAMI). Corvallis: E&S Environmental Chemistry, Inc.Google Scholar
- Sullivan, T. J., Cosby, B. J., Herlihy, A. T., Webb, J. R., Bulger, A. J., Snyder, K. U., et al. (2004). Regional model projections of future effects of sulfur and nitrogen deposition on streams in the Southern Appalachian Mountains. Water Resources Research, 40(2), W02101. doi: 10.1029/2003WR001998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sullivan, T. J., Cosby, B. J., Snyder, K. U., Herlihy, A. T., Jackson, B. (2007). Model-based assessment of the effects of acidic deposition on sensitive watershed resources in the national forests of North Carolina, Tennessee, and South Carolina. Final report prepared for USDA Forest Service, Asheville, NC. Corvallis, OR: E&S Environmental Chemistry, Inc. http://www.fs.fed.us/air/documents/MAGIC_Modeling_Report_October_2007.pdf.
- Sullivan, T. J., Cosby, B. J., Webb, J. R., Dennis, R. L., Bulger, A. J., & Deviney, F. A., Jr. (2008). Streamwater acid–base chemistry and critical loads of atmospheric sulfur deposition in Shenandoah National Park, Virginia. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 137, 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wigington, P. J., Baker, J. P., DeWalle, D. R., Kretser, W. A., Murdoch, P. S., Simonin, H. A., et al. (1993). Episodic acidification of streams in the northeastern United States: Chemical and biological results of the Episodic Response Project. EPA/600/R-93/190, Washington, DC: U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar