Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, Volume 218, Issue 1–4, pp 347–352 | Cite as

Do We Adequately Control for Unmeasured Confounders When Estimating the Short-term Effect of Air Pollution on Mortality?

Article

Abstract

Numerous time series studies have quantified the potential association between daily variations in air pollution and daily variations in non-accidental deaths. In order to account for the presence of unmeasured confounders, a smooth function of time trend is typically used as a proxy for these variables. We shed light on the validity of the results obtained by using this approach. Specifically, we use data from the National Morbidity, Mortality and Air Pollution Study database, and carry out a carefully designed simulation study. Our findings suggest that the use of a smooth function of time trend cannot fully account for the presence of unmeasured confounders, especially when their impact is strong relatively to the effect of air pollution, and when several unobservables are not included in the model.

Keywords

Adverse health effects Air pollution Generalized additive models Unmeasured confounding 

References

  1. Dominici, F., McDermott, A., Daniels, M. J., Zeger, S. L., & Samet, J. M. (2003). Revised analysis of the national morbidity mortality air pollution study: Part II. Cambridge: The Health Effects Institute.Google Scholar
  2. Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (1990). Generalized additive models. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  3. He, S., Mazumdar, S., & Arena, V. C. (2006). A comparative study of the use of GAM and GLM in air pollution research. Environmetrics, 17, 81–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989). Generalized linear models. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Peng, D. R., Dominici, F., & Louis, A. T. (2006). Model choice in time series studies of air pollution and mortality. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 169, 179–203.Google Scholar
  6. Peng, R. D., & Dominici, F. (2008). Statistical methods for environmental epidemiology with R: A case study in air pollution and health. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Peng, R. D., & Welty, L. J. (2004). The NMMAPSdata package. R News, 4, 10–14.Google Scholar
  8. Pope, C. A., & Burnett, R. T. (2007). Confounding in air pollution epidemiology. Epidemiology, 18, 424–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Samet, J., Zeger, S., Dominici, F., Curriero, F., Coursac, I., Dockery, D., et al. (2000). The national morbidity, mortality, and air pollution study. Part II: Morbidity and mortality, from air pollution in the United States. HEI Project, 96–97, 5–47.Google Scholar
  10. Schwartz, J., Zanobetti, A., & Bateson, T. (2003). Morbidity and mortality among elderly residents of cities with daily PM measurements. In Revised analyses of time-series studies of air pollution and health (pp. 25–58). Cambridge: Health Effects Institute.Google Scholar
  11. Wood, S. N. (2006). Generalized additive models: An introduction with R. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Wood, S. N. (2008). Fast stable direct fitting and smoothness selection for generalized additive models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 70, 495–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Statistical ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Health Services Research and PolicyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineLondonUK

Personalised recommendations