Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, Volume 217, Issue 1–4, pp 95–104 | Cite as

Hydrochemical Impacts of Limestone Rock Mining

  • Ghinwa M. NajaEmail author
  • Rosanna Rivero
  • Stephen E. DavisIII
  • Thomas Van Lent


Hydrochemical impacts of shallow rock industrial-scale mining activities close to sensitive constructed and natural wetlands were investigated. The shallow surficial groundwater and surface water in the Everglades Agricultural Area (EAA) were characterized. The chemical composition of sulfate and chloride in groundwater increased with depth. The average concentration of chloride averaged 182 mg L−1 at 6 m deep and increased gradually to 1,010 mg L−1 at 15 m deep, 1,550 mg L−1 at 30 m deep to reach 7,800 mg L−1 at 60 m deep. Comparatively, the surface water chemical composition in the surrounding areas showed much lower cationic and anionic charge. The specific conductivity and total dissolved solids of surface water in canals (close to the mining operations) are <900 μS cm−1 and <600 mg L−1, respectively, which should be compared to groundwater quality in wells from the EAA area (>2,000 μS cm−1 and >1,000 mg L−1, respectively). A steady-state groundwater fluid flow and transient solute transport modeling exercise was conducted to estimate surface/groundwater interactions. The modeled solute in surface water was transported downgradient through groundwaters, migrated approximately 30 m from the source area (after 5 years of operation), and needed more than 116 years to dissipate. An upward transport was also identified whereby chloride and sulfate, naturally present in deeper groundwaters, migrated approximately 200 m (after 1 year of mining) into the pristine shallower aquifer and reached the surface water with a concentration equaling 80% of that in the rock mining pit.


Groundwater/surface water interactions Everglades Agricultural Area Chloride Sulfate 

Supplementary material

11270_2010_570_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (203 kb)
Supplementary materials available. Supporting documents include the rock mining industrial process, the salt impacts on the aquatic ecosystem, soil, vegetation, mammals, and birds, the salt impacts on Florida’s wetlands, effect of chloride on phosphorus uptake by plants, effect of calcium on phosphorus precipitation in the water column, effects of sulfate content on the natural and constructed wetland, Figs. S-1, S-2, S-3, S-4, and S-5 as mentioned in the text. (PDF 203 kb)


  1. Chen, M., Daroub, S. H., Lang, T. A., & Diaz, O. A. (2006). Specific conductance and ionic characteristics of farm canals in the Everglades Agricultural Area. Journal of Environmental Quality, 35(1), 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cherry, D. S., Currie, R. J., Soucek, D. J., Latimer, H. A., & Trent, G. C. (2001). An integrative assessment of a watershed impacted by abandoned mined land discharges. Environmental Pollution, 111(3), 377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Harvey, J. W., Krupa, S. L., & Krest, J. M. (2004). Ground water recharge and discharge in the central Everglades. Ground Water, 42(7), 1090–1102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Harvey, J. W., & McCormick, P. V. (2009). Groundwater’s significance to changing hydrology, water chemistry, and biological communities of a floodplain ecosystem, Everglades, South Florida, USA. Hydrogeology Journal, 17, 185–201.Google Scholar
  5. Harvey, J. W., Newlin, J. T., Krest, J. M., Choi, J., Nemeth, E. A., & Krupa, S. L. (2005). Surface-water and ground-water interactions in the central Everglades, Florida. West Palm Beach: US Geological Survey and South Florida Water Management District.Google Scholar
  6. Hitchcock, D. R. (1975). Biogenic contributions to atmospheric sulphate levels. Chicago: American Institute of Chemical Engineers and US Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  7. Iwanoff, A. (1998). Environmental impacts of deep opencast limestone mines in Laegerdorf, Northern Germany. Mine Water and the Environment, 17(1), 52–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jones, L. A. (1948). Soils, geology and water control in the Everglades region. Gainesville: University of Florida Agricultural Experiment Station.Google Scholar
  9. Katz, M. (1977) The Canadian sulphur problem. Ottawa: National Research Council of Canada—NRCC no. 15015—Associate Committee on Scientific Criteria for Environmental Quality.Google Scholar
  10. Kraus, U., & Wiegand, J. (2006). Long-term effects of the Aznalcollar mine spill—heavy metal content and mobility in soils and sediments of the Guadiamar river valley (SW Spain). Science of the Total Environment, 367(2–3), 855–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lolcama, J. L., Cohen, H. A., & Tonkin, M. J. (2002). Deep karst conduits, flooding, and sinkholes: Lessons for the aggregates industry. Engineering Geology, 65(2–3), 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Miller, W. L. (1988). Description and evaluation of the effects of urban and agricultural development on the surficial aquifer system, Palm Beach County, Florida. Tallahassee: US Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  13. Munoz-Carpena, R., Ritter, A., & Li, Y. C. (2005). Dynamic factor analysis of groundwater quality trends in an agricultural area adjacent to Everglades National Park. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 80(1–2), 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Parker, G. G., Ferguson, G. E., & Love, S. K. (1955). Water resources of southeastern Florida, with special reference to geology and ground water of the Miami area. Tallahassee: US Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  15. Pionke, H. B., & Urban, J. B. (1985). Effect of agricultural land use on groundwater quality in a small Pennsylvania watershed. Ground Water, 23(1), 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ramirez, F. W. (1989). Computational methods for process simulation. Boston: Butterworths.Google Scholar
  17. Reese, R. S., & Wacker, M. A. (2009). Hydrogeologic and hydraulic characterization of the surficial aquifer system, and origin of high salinity groundwater. Palm Beach County, FL: US Department of the Interior and US Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  18. Renken, R. A., Cunningham, K. J., Shapiro, A. M., Harvey, R. W., Zygnerski, M. R., Metge, D. W., et al. (2008). Pathogen and chemical transport in the karst limestone of the Biscayne aquifer: 1. Revised conceptualization of groundwater flow. Water Resources Research, 44(8), 399–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Renken, R. A., Dixon, J., Keohmtedt, J., Ishman, S., Lietz, A. C., Marella, R. L., et al. (2005). Impact of anthropogenic development on coastal groundwater hydrology in southeastern Florida, 1900–2000. Tallahassee: US Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  20. Scott, W. B. (1977). Hydraulic conductivity and water quality of the shallow aquifer, Palm Beach County, Florida. Tallahassee: US Geological Survey, Palm Beach County Board of Commissioners and South Florida Water Management District.Google Scholar
  21. Skousen, J., Simmons, J., McDonald, L. M., & Ziemkiewicz, P. (2002). Acid–base accounting to predict post-mining drainage quality on surface mines. Journal of Environmental Quality, 31(6), 2034–2044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Snyder, G. H. (2004). Everglades area soil subsidence and land use projections. Gainseville: Everglades Research and Education Center, University of Florida/IFAS.Google Scholar
  23. Wetzel, R. G. (1983). Limnology. Philadelphia: Saunders College.Google Scholar
  24. Wu, Y. X., Yu, H. W., & Ching, C. B. (2002). Computational fluid dynamics simulation of the adsorption separation of three components in high performance liquid chromatography. Chromatographia, 55(7/8), 439–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zheng, C., & Wang, P. (1998). MT3DMS: A modular three-dimensional multispecies transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion and chemical reactions of contaminants in groundwater systems. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ghinwa M. Naja
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rosanna Rivero
    • 1
  • Stephen E. DavisIII
    • 1
  • Thomas Van Lent
    • 1
  1. 1.Everglades Foundation, Science DivisionPalmetto BayUSA

Personalised recommendations