Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, Volume 216, Issue 1–4, pp 473–483 | Cite as

Influences of Humic Acid on Cr(VI) Removal by Zero-Valent Iron From Groundwater with Various Constituents: Implication for Long-Term PRB Performance

Article

Abstract

A 9-month-long continuous flow column study was carried out to investigate Cr(VI) removal by Fe0 with the presence of humic acid. The study focused on the influences of humic acid promoted dissolved iron release and humic acid aggregation in Fe0 columns receiving synthetic Cr(VI) contaminated groundwater containing various components such as bicarbonate and Ca. The effects of humic acid varied significantly depending on the presence of Ca. In Ca-free columns, the presence of humic acid promoted the release of dissolved iron in the forms of soluble Fe-humic acid complexes and stabilized fine Fe (hydr)oxide colloids. As a result, the precipitation of iron corrosion products was suppressed and the accumulation of secondary minerals on Fe0 surfaces was diminished, and a slight increase in Cr(VI) removal capacity by 18% was record compared with that of humic acid-free column. In contrast, in the presence of Ca, as evidenced by the SEM and FTIR results, humic acid greatly co-aggregated with Fe (hydr)oxides and deposited on Fe0 surfaces. This largely inhibited electron transfer from Fe0 surfaces to Cr(VI) and reduced the drainable porosity of the Fe0 matrix, resulting in a significant decrease in Cr(VI) removal capacity of Fe0. The Cr(VI) removal capacity was decreased by 24.4% and 42.7% in humic acid and Ca receiving columns, with and without bicarbonate respectively, compared with that of Ca and humic acid-free column. This study yields new considerations for the performance prediction and design of Fe0 PRBs in the environments rich in natural organic matter (NOM).

Keywords

Column experiments Humic acid Permeable reactive barrier Zero-valent iron 

Supplementary material

11270_2010_546_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (479 kb)
ESM 1(PDF 479 kb)

References

  1. Blowes, D. W., Ptacek, C. J., & Jambor, J. L. (1997). In-situ remediation of Cr(VI)-contaminated groundwater using permeable reactive walls: laboratory studies. Environmental Science & Technology, 31, 3348–3357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cantrell, K. J., Kaplan, D. I., & Wietsma, T. W. (1995). Zero-valent iron for the in-situ remediation of selected metals in groundwater. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 42, 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Castro, E. B., Vilche, J. R., & Arvia, A. J. (1991). Iron dissolution and passivation in K2CO3–KHCO3 solutions: Rotating ring disc electrode and xps studies. Corrosion Science, 32, 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dries, J., Bastiaens, L., Springael, D., Kuypers, S., Agathos, S. N., & Diels, L. (2005). Effect of humic acids on heavy metal removal by zero-valent iron in batch and continuous flow column systems. Water Research, 39, 3531–3540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duan, J., & Gregory, J. (2003). Coagulation by hydrolyzing metal salts. Advances In Colloid And Interface Science, 100–102, 475–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eary, L. E., & Rai, D. (1988). Chromate removal from aqueous wastes by reduction with ferrous ion. Environmental Science & Technology, 22, 972–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gillham, R. W., & O’ Hannesin, S. F. (1994). Enhanced degradation of halogenated aliphatics by zero-valent iron. Ground Water, 32, 958–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gu, B., Schmitt, J., Chen, Z., Liang, L., & MaCarthy, J. F. (1994). Adsorption and desorption of natural organic matter on iron oxide mechanisms and models. Environmental Science & Technology, 28, 38–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gu, B., Phelps, T. J., Liang, L., Dickey, M. J., Roh, Y., Kinsall, B. L., et al. (1999). Biogeochemical dynamics in zero-valent iron columns: Implications for permeable reactive barriers. Environmental Science & Technology, 33, 2170–2177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kamolpornwijit, W., Liang, L., West, O. R., Moline, G. R., & Sullivan, A. B. (2003). Preferential flow path development and its influence on long term PRB performance: Column study. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 66, 161–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Klausen, J., Vikesland, P. J., Kohn, T., Burris, D. R., Ball, W. P., & Roberts, A. L. (2003). Longevity of granular iron in groundwater treatment processes: Solution composition effects on reduction of organohalides and nitroaromatic compounds. Environmental Science & Technology, 37, 1208–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lai, K. C. K., & Lo, I. M. C. (2008). Removal of chromium(VI) by acid-washed zero-valent iron under various groundwater geochemistry conditions. Environmental Science & Technology, 42, 1238–1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Legrand, L., Figuigui, A. E., Mercier, F., & Chausse, A. (2004). Reduction of aqueous chromate by Fe(II)/Fe(III) carbonate green rust: Kineic and mechanistic studies. Environmental Science & Technology, 38, 4587–4595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu, T., Tsang, D. C. W., & Lo, I. M. C. (2008). Chromium(VI) reduction kinetics by zero-valent iron in moderately hard water with humic acid: Iron dissolution and humic acid adsorption. Environmental Science & Technology, 42, 2092–2098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lo, I. M. C., Lam, C. S. C., & Lai, K. C. K. (2006). Hardness and carbonate effects on the reactivity of zero-valent iron for Cr(VI) removal. Water Research, 40, 595–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Powell, R. M., Puls, R. W., Hightower, S. K., & Sabatini, D. A. (1995). Coupled iron corrosion and chromate reduction: mechanisms for subsurface remediation. Environmental Science & Technology, 29, 1913–1922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pratt, A. R., Blowes, D. W., & Ptacek, C. J. (1997). Products of chromate reduction on proposed subsurface remediation material. Environmental Science & Technology, 31, 2492–2498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Roh, Y., Lee, S. Y., & Elless, M. P. (2000). Characterization of corrosion products in the permeable reactive barriers. Environ Geo, 40, 184–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Saito, T., Koopal, L. K., van Riemsdijk, W. H., Nagasaki, S., & Tanaka, S. (2004). Adsorption of humic acid on goethite: Isotherms, charge adjustments, and potential profiles. Langmuir, 20, 689–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Snoeyink, V. L., & Jenkins, D. (1980). Water chemistry. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Thurman, E. M. (1985). Organic geochemistry of natural waters. Dordrecht: Martnus Nijhoff/Junk.Google Scholar
  22. Tipping, E. (2002). Cation binding by humic substances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tratnyek, P. G., Scherer, M. M., Deng, B., & Hu, S. (2001). Effects of natural organic matter, anthropogenic surfactants, and model quinones on the reduction of contaminants by zero-valent iron. Water Research, 35, 4435–4443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. USEPA. (1998). Permeable Reactive Barrier Technologies for Contaminant Remediation. EPA/600/R-98/125.Google Scholar
  25. VanGulck, J. F., & Rowe, R. K. (2004). Evolution of clog formation with time in columns permeated with synthetic landfill leachate. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 75, 115–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. von der Kumpulainen, S., Kammer, F., & Hofmann, T. (2008). Humic acid adsorption and surface charge effects on schwertmanite and goethite in acid sulphate waters. Water Research, 42, 2051–2060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Weng, L. P., Koopal, L. K., Hiemstra, T., Meeussen, J. C. L., & van Riemsdijk, W. H. (2005). Interactions of calcium and fulvic acid at the goethite-water interface. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 69, 325–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wilkin, R. T., Su, C., Ford, R. G., & Paul, C. J. (2005). Chromium-removal processes during groundwater remediation by a zerovalent iron permeable reactive barrier. Environmental Science & Technology, 39, 4599–4605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Williams, A. G. B., & Scherer, M. M. (2001). Kinetic of Cr(VI) reduction by carbonate green rust. Environmental Science & Technology, 35, 3488–3494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Xie, L., & Shang, C. (2005). Role of humic acid and quinone model compounds in bromate reduction by zerovalent iron. Environmental Science & Technology, 39, 1092–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringThe Hong Kong University of Science and TechnologyHong KongChina
  2. 2.AECOM (Hong Kong) LtdHong KongChina

Personalised recommendations