Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, Volume 215, Issue 1–4, pp 155–176 | Cite as

Model Assessment of Cattle and Climate Impacts on Stream Fecal Coliform Pollution in the Salmon River Watershed, British Columbia, Canada

Article

Abstract

A bacterial water quality model (BWQM) was developed and used to evaluate the impacts of cattle farming and climate change on the stream fecal coliform pollution in the Salmon River watershed in south-central British Columbia, Canada. The accuracy of the model simulation was evaluated using the Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient of efficiency (COE). The BWQM simulated the observed field data well, with the values of the COE ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 for the stream flow, from 0.55 to 0.60 for the fecal coliform (FC) concentration, and from 0.85 to 0.89 for the FC loading. The BWQM captured more than 79%, 66%, and 90% variation of the daily stream flow, FC concentration, and FC loading, respectively. The BWQM predicts that between 70% and 80% of the FC were transferred from the cattle farm to the Salmon River through the snowmelt-caused surface runoff during late winter and early spring, with the balance 20% to 30% coming from the soil-lateral flow and the groundwater return flow. The model also indicates that the stream FC concentration is sensitive to the distance of the cattle farm to the Salmon River. The model scenario analysis reveals that the climate change, at an assumed 1°C increment of daily air temperature, results in an increase in the stream FC concentration in the spring, fall, and winter, but there is also a decrease in the summer. The increased air temperature also changes the seasonal pattern of the stream FC concentration. Rainfall can reduce the stream FC concentration and mitigate the impact of the increased air temperature on the stream FC concentration as long as it does not result in a surface runoff or flooding event.

Keywords

Fecal coliform Water quality Model Cattle farming Climate 

References

  1. Alexander, M. (1986). Fate and movement of microganism in the environment, Part 1: survival and growth of bacteria. Environmental Management, 10, 463–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ASAE (2003). Manure Production and Characteristics. American Society of Engineers in Agricultural, Food, and Biological Systems, 2950 Niles Rd, St. Joseph, MI 49085-9659, USA.Google Scholar
  3. Atlas, R. M., & Bartha, R. (1998). Microbial ecology. Fundamental and applications (4th ed.). Menlo Park: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
  4. Avery, S. M., Moor, A., & Hutchison, M. L. (2004). Fate of Escherichia coli originating from livestock feces deposited directly onto pasture. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 38, 355–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bai, S., & Lung, W. (2005). Modelling sediment impact on the transport of fecal bacteria. Water Research, 39, 5232–5240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. BC Ministry of Environment (2006). British Columbia Approved Water Qaulity Guidelines. PO Box 9341, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8W 9 M1.Google Scholar
  7. BC Ministry of Environment (2007). British Columbia Environmental Laboratory Manual: 2007 for the Analysis of Water, Wasterwater, Sediment, Biological Materials and Discrete Ambient Air Samples. Ministry of Environment, Government of British Columbia, PO Box 9341, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8W 9 M1.Google Scholar
  8. Beck, M. B. (1987). Water quality modelling: A review of the analysis of uncertainty. Water Resources Research, 23, 1393–1442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Belsky, A. J., Matzke, A., & Uselman, S. (1999). Survey of livestock influences in stream and riparian ecosystems in the western United States. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 54, 419–431.Google Scholar
  10. Bonan, G. B. (1989). A computer model of the solar radiation, soil moisture, and soil thermal regimes in boreal forests. Ecological Modelling, 45, 275–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bristow, K. L., Campbell, G. S., Papendick, R. I., & Elliott, L. F. (1986). Simulation of heat and moisture transfer through a surface residue-soil system. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 36, 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brookes, J. D., Antenucci, J., Hipsey, M., Burch, M. D., Ashbolt, N. J., & Ferguson, C. (2004). Fate and transport of pathogen in lakes and reservoirs. Environment International, 30, 741–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, T. L., LeMay, H. E., Jr., Bursten, B. E., & Burdge, J. R. (2002). Chemistry: the central science. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
  14. Canale, R. P., Auer, M. T., Owens, E. M., Heidtke, T. M., & Effler, S. W. (1993). Modeling fecal coliform bacteria-II: Model development and application. Water Research, 27, 703–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Charron, D. F., Thomas, M. K., Waltner-Toews, D., Aramini, J. J., Edge, T., Kent, R. A., et al. (2004). Vulnerability of waterborne diseases to climate change in Canada: A review. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, 67, 1667–1677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Collins, R., & Rutherford, K. (2004). Modelling bacterial water quality in stream draining pastoral land. Water Research, 38, 700–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cossarini, G., & Solidoro, C. (2008). Global sensitivity analysis of a trophodynamic model of the Guld Trieste. Ecological Modelling, 212, 16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Entry, J. A., Hubbard, R. K., Thies, J. E., & Fuhrmann, J. J. (2000a). The influence of vegetation in riparian filter strips on coliform bacteria: I. movement and survival in water. Journal of Environmental Quality, 29, 1206–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Entry, J. A., Hubbard, R. K., Thies, J. E., & Fuhrmann, J. J. (2000b). The influence of vegetation in riparian filterstrips on coliform bacteria: II. Survival in soils. Journal of Environmental Quality, 29, 1215–1224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ferguson, C., de Roda Husman, A., Altavilla, N., Deere, D., & Ashbolt, N. (2003). Fate and transport of surface water pathogens in a watershed. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 33(3), 299–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Flint, K. P. (1987). The long term survivial of Escherichia coli in river water. The Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 63, 261–270.Google Scholar
  22. Fraser Basin Council (2006). Sustainability Snapshot, 2006 State of the Fraser Basin Report. 470 Granville St., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6C 1 V5.Google Scholar
  23. Fraser, R. H., Barten, P. K., & Pinney, D. A. K. (1998). Predicting stream pathogen loading from livestock using a geographical information system-based delivery model. Journal of Environmental Quality, 27, 935–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gary, H., Johnson, H., & Ponce, S. (1983). Cattle grazing impact on surface water quality in a Colorado front range stream. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 43, 124–128.Google Scholar
  25. Greer, A., Ng, V., & Fisman, D. (2008). Climate change and infections diseases in North America: the road ahead. CMAJ, 178, 715–722.Google Scholar
  26. Grizzetti, B., Bouraoui, F., Granlund, K., Rekolainen, S., & Bidoglio, G. (2003). Modeling diffuse emission and retention of nutrients in the Vantaanjoki watershed (Finland) using the SWAT model. Ecological Modelling, 169, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guber, A. K., Pachepsky, Y. A., Shelton, D. R., & Yu, O. (2007). Effect of bovine manure on fecal coliform attachment to soil and soil particles of different sizes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 73, 3363–3370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hanson, S., Shaffer, M. J., & Jensen, H. E. (1995). Development in modeling nitrogen transformations in soil. In: Nitrogen Fertilization in the Environment. Edited by Bacon, P.E., Marcel Dekker Inc., New York. pp. 80–128.Google Scholar
  29. Howell, J. M., Coyne, M. S., & Cornelius, P. L. (1996). Effect of sediment particle size and temperature on fecal bacteria mortality rates and the fecal coliform/fecal streptococci ratio. Journal of Environmental Quality, 25, 1216–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hughes, K. A. (2005). Effects of Antarctic solar radiation on sewage bacteria viability. Water Research, 39, 2237–2244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hunter, P. R. (2003). Climate change and waterborne and vector-borne disease. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 94, 37S–46S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Klemeš, V. (1986). Operational testing of hydrological simulation models. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 31, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kouznetsov, M. Y., Roodsari, R., Pachepsky, Y. A., Shelton, D. R., Sadeghi, A. M., Shirmohammadi, A., et al. (2007). Modelling manure-borne bromide and fecal coliform transport with runoff and infiltration at a hillslope. Journal of Environmental Management, 84, 336–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ling, T., Achberger, E., Drapcho, C., & Bengtson, R. (2002). Quantifying adsorption of an indicator bacteria in a soil-water system. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 45, 669–674.Google Scholar
  35. McRae, B. H., Schuamker, N. H., McKane, R. B., Busing, R. T., Solomon, A. M., & Burdick, C. A. (2008). A multi-model framework for simulating wildlife population response to land-use and climate change. Ecological Modelling, 219, 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meays, C. L., Broersma, K., Nordin, R., & Mazumder, A. (2005). Survival of Escherichia coli in beef cattle fecal pats under different levels of solar exposure. Rangeland Ecol Manage, 58, 279–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meays, C. L., Broersma, K., Nordin, R., Mazumder, A., & Samadpour, M. (2006). Spatial and annual variability in concentrations and sources of Escherichia Coli in multiple watersheds. Environmental Science & Technology, 40, 89–5296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Meidinger, J., & Pojar, J. (1991). Ecosystems of British Columbia. Special Report Series 6. ISSN 0843-6452. BC Ministry of Forests, PO Box 9341, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8W 9M1.Google Scholar
  39. Meixner, T., Gutmann, C., Bales, R., Leydecker, A., Sickman, J., Melack, J., et al. (2004). Multidecadal hydrological response of a Sierra Nevada watershed: Sensitivity to weathering rate and change in deposition. Journal of Hydrology, 285, 272–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Meng, F. R., Bourque, C. P. A., Jewett, K., Daugharty, D., & Arp, P. A. (1995). The Nashwaak experimental watershed project: Analyzing effects of clearcutting on soil temperature, soil moisture, snowpack, snowmelt and stream flow. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 82, 363–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Morita, R. Y. (1975). Psychrophilic bacteria. Bacteriological Reviews, 39, 144–167.Google Scholar
  42. Núňez-Delgado, A., López-Periago, E., & Viqueira, F. D. (2002). Chloride, sodium, potassium and fecal bacteria levels in surface runoff and subsurface percolates from grassland plots amended with cattle slurry. Bioresource Technology, 82, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Outdoor Recreation Council of BC (2008). List of rivers most in need of protection, enhancement and conservation. Kamloops Daily News, page 1, March 25, 2008.Google Scholar
  44. Patz, J. A., Vavrus, S. J., Uejio, C. K., & McLellan, S. L. (2008). Climate change and waterborne disease rish in the Great Lake Region of the U.S. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, 451–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Svensson, M., Jansson, P. E., Gustafsson, D., Kleja, D. B., Langvall, O., & Lindroth, A. (2008). Bayesian calibration of a model describing carbon, water, and heat fluxes for a Swedish boreal forest stand. Ecological Modelling, 213, 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tate, K. W., Atwill, E. R., McDougald, N. K., George, M. R., & Witt, D. (2000). A method for estimating cattle fecal loading on rangeland watershed. Journal of Range Management, 53, 506–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tate, K. W., Atwill, E. R., Bartolome, J. W., & Nader, G. (2006). Significant Escherichia coli attenuation by vegetation buffers on annual grasslands. Journal of Environmental Quality, 35, 795–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wilkinson, J., Jenkins, A., Wyer, M., & Kay, D. (1995). Modelling fecal coliform dynamics in stream and rivers. Water Research, 29, 847–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zar, J. H. (2007). Biostatitical Analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Water and Aquatic Sciences Research Program, Department of BiologyUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaCanada
  2. 2.Kamloops Range Research StationAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaKamloopsCanada

Personalised recommendations