Advertisement

Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, Volume 215, Issue 1–4, pp 145–153 | Cite as

Development of a Biofilter with Tire-Derived Rubber Particle Media for Hydrogen Sulfide Odor Removal

  • Jaeyoung ParkEmail author
  • Eric A. Evans
  • Timothy G. Ellis
Article

Abstract

The biofilter system containing tire-derived rubber particle (TDRP) filter media was utilized to treat the odorous gas contaminant, hydrogen sulfide, in consideration of the economic advantage of reusing discarded tire materials and the high potential of TDRP media for biofilm attachment. The pilot-scale system having 0.38 m3 of bed volume operated with synthetic hydrogen sulfide gas on continuous basis from a range of 0.34 to 1.15 m3/min. This bioreactor system achieved over 94% removal efficiency at 20–90 ppm of inlet H2S concentration while operating in 20–67 s of empty bed retention time, indicating that overall effective operation was performed at mass loading rates of H2S ranging from 19.6 to 28.5 g H2S/(m3 h). It was apparent by the effectiveness of the system’s performance that this system had the capability to effectively remove hydrogen sulfide with high efficiency over a range of concentrations. A maximum elimination capacity was not found for the biofilter during this study, which tested loading rates between 0 and 30 g H2S/(m3 h).

Keywords

Tire-derived rubber particle (TDRP) Biofilter Hydrogen sulfide Pilot-scale scrubber 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank to Envirotech Systems, Inc., for providing TDRP media, financing this research, and otherwise supporting this work.

References

  1. Barbin, W. W., & Rodgers, M. B. (1994). The science of rubber compounding. In J. E. Mark, B. Erman, & F. R. Eirich (Eds.), Science and technology of rubber (pp. 419–469). San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  2. Burgess, J. E., Parsons, A. A., & Stuetz, R. M. (2001). Developments in odour control and waste gas treatment biotechnology: A review. Biotechnology Advances, 19(35), 36–63.Google Scholar
  3. Chung, Y.-C., Huang, C., & Tseng, C.-P. (1996). Operation optimization of Thiobacillus thioparus CH11 biofilter for hydrogen sulfide removal. Journal of Biotechnology, 52(1), 31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Droste, R. L. (1997). Theory and practice of water and wastewater treatment. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Duan, H., Koe, L. C. C., et al. (2006). Biological treatment of H2S using pellet activated carbon as a carrier of microorganisms in a biofilter. Water Research, 40(14), 2629–2636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gabriel, D., Cox, H. H. J., & Deshusses, M. A. (2004). Conversion of full-scale wet scrubbers to biotrickling filters for H2S control at publicly owned treatment works. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 130(10), 1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hansen, N. G., & Rindel, K. (2000). Bioscrubbing, an effective and economic solution to odour control at wastewater treatment plants. Water Science and Technology, 41(6), 155.Google Scholar
  8. Hirai, M., Kamamoto, M., et al. (2001). Comparison of the biological H2S removal characteristics among four inorganic packing materials. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 91(4), 396–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jensen, A. B., & Webb, C. (1995). Treatment of H2S-containing gases: A review of microbiological alternatives. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 17, 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Koe, L. C. C., & Yang, F. (2000). A bioscrubber for hydrogen sulfide removal. Water Science and Technology, 41(6), 141.Google Scholar
  11. Luo, J., & Lindsey, S. (2006). The use of pine bark and natural zeolite as biofilter media to remove animal rendering process odours. Bioresource Technology, 97(13), 1461–1469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moo-Young, H., Sellasie, K., et al. (2003). Physical and chemical properties of recycled tire shreds for use in construction. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 129(10), 921–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Morton, R., Lee, A., Tang, C. C., Horvath, R., & Stahl J. (2005) A two-stage biotrickling filter system for odors and volatile organic compounds removal. In Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation 73rd Annual Conference and Exposition, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  14. Nishimura, S., & Yoda, M. (1997). Removal of hydrogen sulfide from an anaerobic biogas using a bio-scrubber. Water Science and Technology, 36(6–7), 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Oh, D. I., Song, J., et al. (2009). Effects of adsorptive properties of biofilter packing materials on toluene removal. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 170(1), 144–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pagans, E., Font, X., et al. (2007). Adsorption, absorption, and biological degradation of ammonia in different biofilter organic media. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 97(3), 515–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Park, J., Ellis T. G., Lally, M. (2006). Evaluation of tire derived rubber particles for biofiltration media. In Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation 74rd Annual Conference and Exposition, Dallas, TX.Google Scholar
  18. Potivichayanon, S., Pokethitiyook, P., & Kruarachue, M. (2006). Hydrogen sulfide removal by a novel fixed-film bioscrubber system. Process Biochemistry, 41, 708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Qiao, S., & Fu, L. et al. (2008). Removal characteristics of hydrogen sulfide in biofilters with fibrous peat and resin. In 2nd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, iCBBE.Google Scholar
  20. Saliling, W. J. B., Westerman, P. W., et al. (2007). Wood chips and wheat straw as alternative biofilter media for denitrification reactors treating aquaculture and other wastewaters with high nitrate concentrations. Aquacultural Engineering, 37(3), 222–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Seda, J. H., Lee, J. C., et al. (2007). Beneficial use of waste tire rubber for swelling potential mitigation in expansive soils. Soil improvement (GSP 172). Denver: ASCE.Google Scholar
  22. Shanchayan, B., Parker, W., et al. (2006). Dynamic analysis of a biofilter treating autothermal thermophilic aerobic digestion gas. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science, 5(3), 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shareefdeen, Z., Herner B., et al. (2003). Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) removal in synthetic media biofilters. Environmental progress, 22(3), 207–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shareefdeen, Z., & Singh, A. (2005). Biotechnology for odor and air pollution control. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Subletle, K. L., & Sylvester, N. D. (1987). Oxidation of hydrogen sulfide by Thiobacillus denitrificans: Desulfurization of natural gas. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 29, 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wolstenholme, P., & Schafer, P. (2005) Odor control bioscrubbers. A 20 year history of successful applications. In Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation 73rd Annual Conference and Exposition, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  27. Yang, C., Chen, H., et al. (2009). Modeling variations of medium porosity in rotating drum biofilter. Chemosphere, 74(2), 245–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yang, C., Suidan, M. T., et al. (2003). Comparison of single-layer and multi-layer rotating drum biofilters for VOC removal. Environmental Progress, 22(2), 87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaeyoung Park
    • 1
    Email author
  • Eric A. Evans
    • 1
  • Timothy G. Ellis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental EngineeringIowa State UniversityAmesUSA

Personalised recommendations