Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, Volume 214, Issue 1–4, pp 471–490 | Cite as

Fluorescence Analysis of Natural Organic Matter Fractionated by Ultrafiltration: Contrasting Between Urban-Impacted Water, and Radio-Contaminated Water from a Near-Pristine Site



Aqueous natural organic matter (NOM) impacted by two contrasting human impacts was analyzed using by multiresponse fluorescence, decoupled with the resolution routine PARAFAC. The first site is Chalk River, Ontario, Canada, near a pit formerly used to dispose low-level wastes. The second site is the Grand River in Cambridge, south-central Ontario, which is impacted by urban activities and agriculture. Our analysis included raw water, plus fractions from ultrafiltration and solid-phase extraction (SPE). The fluorescence spectra of the NOM, resolved with PARAFAC, showed three common features: humic-like components, at excitation/emission wavelengths 325–350/450–475 nm, fulvic-like components at 325/380–420 nm and protein-like components, at 275/300 nm. Ultrafiltration revealed that most of the NOM comprised fine material below 5,000 Da cut-off (<4% of the total) in the urban-impacted sites and the clean site at Chalk River, but the colloidal fraction (larger than 5,000 Da) was substantially higher in the contaminated water, with ∼18–26% of the total. The protein-like components in the contaminated Chalk River water were affected by ultrafiltration, but less so in the clean Chalk River sample and the urban-impacted waters. SPE preferentially removed the protein-like component in the contaminated Chalk River water (typically 89–95% signal decrease), but had a limited effect on humic- and fulvic-like components elsewhere. In conclusion, multiresponse fluorescence provided new information on the NOM quality from two contrasting sites, aided by ultrafiltration and SPE. These results are consistent with the in situ production of NOM in the Chalk River contaminated site, and natural production at the other sites.


Natural organic matter Ultrafiltration Multiresponse fluorescence Colloidal material Solid-phase extraction 


  1. Agbekodo, K. M., Croué, J.-P., Dard, S., & Legube, B. (1996). Analyse par HPLC et GC/SM des constituants du carbone organique dissous (COD), du COD biodégradable (CODB) et des composés organo-halogénés (TOX) d'un perméat de nanofiltration. Revue des Sciences de l'Eau, 4, 535–555.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmad, U. K., Ujang, Z., Yusop, Z., & Fong, T. L. (2002). Fluorescence technique for the characterization of natural organic matter in river water. Water Science and Technology, 46, 117–125.Google Scholar
  3. Andersen, C. M., & Bro, R. (2003). Practical aspects of PARAFAC modeling of fluorescence excitation - emission data. J. Chemometrics 17, 200–215.Google Scholar
  4. Baker, A. (2001). Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix characterization of some sewage-impacted rivers. Environmental Science & Technology, 35, 948–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beckett, R., Jue, Z., & Giddings, J. C. (1987). Determination of molecular weight distributions of fulvic and humic acids using flow field-flow fractionation. Environmental Science & Technology, 21, 289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boehme, J., & Wells, M. (2006). Fluorescence variability of marine and terrestrial colloids: examining size fractions of chromophoric dissolved organic matter in the Damariscotta River estuary. Marine Chemistry, 101, 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bouby, M., Geckeis, H., & Geyer, F. W. (2008). Application of asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation (AsFIFFF) coupled to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICPMS) to the quantitative characterization of natural colloids and synthetic nanoparticles. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 392, 1447–1457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burstein, E. A., Vedenkina, N. S., & Ivkova, M. N. (1973). Fluorescence and the location of tryptophan residues in protein molecules. Photochemistry and Photobiology, 18, 263–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caron, F., & Mankarios, G. (2004). Pre-assessment of the speciation of 60Co, 125Sb, 137Cs and 241Am in a contaminated aquifer. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 77, 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caron, F., Laurin, S., Simister, C., Jacques, C., & Mankarios, G. (2007). Potential use of ultrafiltration for groundwater remediation and aqueous speciation of 60Co and 137Cs from a contaminated area. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 178, 121–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapman, P. J., Clark, J. M., Reynolds, B. & Andamson, J. K. (2008). The influence of organic acids in relation to acid deposition in controlling the acidity of soil and stream waters on a seasonal basis. Environmental Pollution, 151, 110–120.Google Scholar
  12. Chen, W., Westerhoff, P., Leenheer, J. A., & Booksh, K. (2003). Fluorescence excitation–emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter. Environmental Science & Technology, 37, 5701–5710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coble, P. G. (1996). Characterization of marine and terrestrial DOM in seawater using excitation-emission matrix spectroscopy. Marine Chemistry, 51, 325–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooper, E. L., & McHugh, J. O. (1983). Migration of radiocontaminants in a forested wetland on the Canadian Shield: nuclide speciation and arboreal uptake. Science of the Total Environment, 28, 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Curtis, P. J., & Schindler, D. W. (1997). Hydrologic control of dissolved organic matter in low-order Precambrian Shield lakes. Biogeochemistry, 36, 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frimmel, F. H. (1998). Characterization of natural organic matter as major constituents in aquatic systems. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 35, 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Galvez, F., Donini, A., Playle, R. C., Smith, D. S., O'Konnell, M. J., & Wood, C. M. (2008). A matter of potential concern: natural organic matter alters the electrical properties of fish gills. Environmental Science & Technology, 42, 9385–9390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Geckeis, H., Ngo Mahn, Th, Bouby, M., & Kim, J. I. (2003). Aquatic colloids relevant to radionuclide migration: characterization by size fractionation and ICP-mass spectrometric detection. Colloids and Surfaces. A, Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 217, 101–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hall, G. J., & Kenny, J. E. (2007). Estuarine water classification using EEM spectroscopy and PARAFAC-SIMCA. Analytica Chimica Acta, 581, 118–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holbrook, R. D., Yen, J. H., & Grizzard, T. J. (2006). Characterizing natural organic material from the Occoquan Watershed (Northern Virginia, US) using fluorescence spectroscopy and PARAFAC. The Science of the Total Environment, 361, 249–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jackson, R. E., & Inch, K. J. (1980). Hydrogeochemical processes affecting the migration of radionuclides in a fluvial sand aquifer at the Chalk River Nuclear Laboratories. Inland Waters Directorate, NHRI Paper No 7, Scientific Series No. 104, Ottawa, Ont.Google Scholar
  22. Kang, K.-H., Shin, H. S., & Park, H. (2002). Characterization of humic substances present in landfill leachates with different landfill ages and its implications. Water Research, 36, 4023–4032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Killey, R. W. D., McHugh, J. O., Champ, D. R., Cooper, E. L., & Young, J. L. (1984). Subsurface Cobalt-60 migration from a low-level waste disposal site. Environmental Science & Technology, 18, 148–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kowalczuk, P., Stron-Egiert, J., Cooper, W. J., Whitehead, R. F., & Durako, M. J. (2005). Characterization of chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) in the Baltic Sea by excitation emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy. Marine Chemistry, 96, 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leenheer, J. A. (1981). Comprehensive approach to preparative isolation and fractionation of dissolved organic carbon from natural waters and wastewaters. Environmental Science & Technology, 15, 578–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leenheer, J. A., & Croué, J.-P. (2003). Characterizing aquatic dissolved organic matter. Environmental Science & Technology, 37, 18A–26A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leonard, K. S., Harvey, B. R., Woodhead, R. J., Brooks, T., & McCubbin, D. (1994). Assessment of an ultrafiltration technique for the fractionation of radionuclides associated with humic material. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 181, 309–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Litaor, M. I., & Thurman, E. M. (1988). Acid neutralizing processes in an alpine watershed front range, Colorado, U.S.A.—1: buffering capacity of dissolved organic carbon in soil solutions. Applied Geochemistry, 3, 645–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu, R., Lead, J. R., & Baker, A. (2007). Fluorescence characterization of cross flow ultrafiltration derived freshwater colloidal and dissolved organic matter. Chemosphere, 68, 1304–1311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ludwig, U. K., Grischek, T., Neitzel, P., & Nestler, W. (1997). Ultrafiltration: a technique for determining the molecular-mass distribution of group parameters of organic pollutants in natural waters. Journal of Chromatography. A, 763, 315–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marley, N. A., Gaffney, J. S., Orlandini, K. A., & Cunningham, M. M. (1993). Evidence for radionuclide transport and mobilization in a shallow, sandy aquifer. Environmental Science & Technology, 27, 2456–2461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morel, F. M. M., & Hering, J. G. (1993). Principles and applications of aquatic chemistry. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  33. Mounier, S., Patel, N., Quilici, L., Benaim, J. Y., & Benamou, C. (1999). Fluorescence 3D de la matière organique dissoute du fleuve Amazone (Three-dimensional fluorescence of the dissolved organic carbon in the Amazon river). Water Research, 33, 1523–1533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Murphy, K. R., Stedmon, C. A., Waite, T. D., & Ruiz, G. M. (2008). Distinguishing between terrestrial and autochtonous organic matter sources in marine enfironments using fluorescence spectroscopy. Marine Chemistry, 108, 40–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nikolaou, A. D., & Lekkas, T. D. (2001). The role of natural organic matter during formation of chlorination by-products: a review. Acta Hydrochimica et Hydrobiologica, 29, 63–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Penrose, W. R., Polzer, W. L., Essington, E. H., Nelson, D. M., & Orlandini, K. A. (1990). Mobility of Plutonium and Americium through a shallow aquifer in a semiarid region. Environmental Science & Technology, 24, 228–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Presant, E. W., & Wicklund, R. E. (1971). The soils of Waterloo County. Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Department of Soil Science, University of Guelph, and the Ontario Department of Agriculture and food, Report No. 44, of the Ontario Soil Survey Ottawa.Google Scholar
  38. Qiao, P., & Farrell, A. P. (2002). Influence of dissolved humic acid on hydrophobic chemical uptake in juvenile rainobow trout. Toxicology & Pharmacology, 133, 575–585.Google Scholar
  39. Reszat, T. N., & Hendry, M. J. (2005). Characterizing dissolved organic carbon using asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation with on-line UV and DOC detection. Analytical Chemistry, 77, 4194–4200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Scamehorn, J. F., Christian, S. D., El-Sayed, D. A., & Uchiyama, H. (1994). Removal of divalent cations and their mixtures from aqueous steams using micelle-enhanced ultrafiltration. Separation Science and Technology, 29, 809–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schafer, A. I., Mauch, R., Waite, T. D., & Fane, A. G. (2002). Charge effects in the fractionation of natural organics using ultrafiltration. Environmental Science & Technology, 36, 2572–2580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schmitt, D., Saravia, F., Frimmel, F. H., & Schuessler, W. (2003). NOM-facilitated transport of metal ions in aquifers: importance of complex-dissociation kinetics and colloid formation. Water Research, 37, 3541–3550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sihombing, R., Greenwood, P. F., Wilson, M. A., & Hanna, J. V. (1996). Composition of size exclusion fractions of swamp water humic and fulvic acids as measured by solid state NMR and pyrolysis-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Organic Geochemistry, 24, 859–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith, D. S., & Kramer, J. R. (1999). Fluorescence analysis for multi-site aluminum binding to natural organic matter. Environment International, 25, 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith, D. S., & Kramer, J. R. (2000). Multisite metal binding to fulvic acid determined using multiresponse fluorescence. Analytica Chimica Acta, 416, 211–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stedmon, C. A., & Markager, S. (2005). Resolving the variability in dissolved organic matter fluorescence in a termperate estuary and its catchment using PARAFAC analysis. Limnology and Oceanography, 50, 686–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stedmon, C. A., Markager, S., & Bro, R. (2003). Tracing dissolved organic matter in aquatic environments using a new approach to fluorescence spectroscopy. Marine Chemistry, 82, 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stumm, W., & Morgan, J. J. (1996). Aquatic chemistry (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
  49. Vigneault, B., Percot, A., Lafleur, M., & Campbell, P. G. C. (2000). Permeability changes in model and phytoplankton membranes in the presence of aquatic humic substances. Environmental Science & Technology, 34, 3907–3913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weis, M., Abbt-Braun, G., & Frimmel, F. H. (1989). Humic-like substances from landfill leachates—characterization and comparison with terrestrial and aquatic humic substances. Science of the Total Environment, 81\82, 343–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wise, B. M., Gallagher, N. B., Bro, R., Shaver, J. M., Windig, W., & Koch, R. S. (2006). PLS Toobox Version 4.0 for use with Matab™. Eigenvector Research Inc. Wenatchee, WA, USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry and BiochemistryLaurentian UniversitySudburyCanada
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryWilfrid Laurier UniversityWaterlooCanada

Personalised recommendations