Water, Air, & Soil Pollution

, Volume 214, Issue 1–4, pp 253–273 | Cite as

Approaching Cumulative Effects through Air Pollution Modelling

Article

Abstract

The research presented here represents a segment of a cumulative impact assessment of resource development in northeastern British Columbia. It considers point and area source emissions of sulphur and nitrogen oxides (SO2 and NOx, respectively), over a 2,156-km2 area. With the exception of open burning, all emissions are from Upstream Oil and Gas (UOG) sector sources (SO2, n = 103; NOx, n = 250; area, n = 25). AERMOD View™ was used to estimate the maximum potential concentration and deposition of these pollutants over 1-h, 3-h, 24-h, and annual averaging periods. Results are compared with various thresholds and limits from the policy and scientific literature to assess the potential cumulative effects of these pollutants. Of the thresholds employed, exceedances of the 1-h and 24-h NOx concentrations and the annual SO2 concentration are predicted. There were no predicted exceedances of annual deposition thresholds (i.e., “Critical Loads”). Maximum predicted concentrations vary between compounds and are related to boundary layer stability, elevation, and distance from sources. Comparison with nearby monitoring data indicated that predicted concentrations were reasonable and that AERMOD provides a useful tool for approaching the potential cumulative impacts of air pollution from multiple sources. While the accuracy of Gaussian-based annual deposition estimates is questioned, model enhancements that could extend the application to more comprehensive assessments are suggested. Lastly, the implications of predicted threshold violations for forest ecosystems and local forest-dependent First Nations communities are discussed.

Keywords

Sulphur and nitrogen oxides AERMOD Upstream oil and gas Air quality standards Critical loads Cumulative impacts 

References

  1. Arbaugh, M., Bytnerowicz, A., Grulke, N., Fenn, M., Poth, M., Temple, P., et al. (2003). Photochemical smog effects in mixed conifer forests along a natural gradient of ozone and nitrogen deposition in the San Bernardino Mountains. Environment International, 29, 401–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arp, P. A., Oja, T., & Marsh, M. (1996). Calculating critical S and N loads and current exceedances for upland forests in southern Ontario, Canada. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 26, 696–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atanasiu, L. (1969). Photosynthesis and respiration of some lichens during winter. Revue Roumaine de Biologie Series Botanica, 14(165), 168.Google Scholar
  4. Aznar, J. C., Richer-Laflèche, M., Paucar-Muñoz, H., Bordeleau, M., & Bégin, Y. (2009). Is tree growth reduction related to direct foliar injuries or soil chemistry modifications? Chemosphere, 76, 1366–1371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bajwa, K. S., Arya, S. P., & Aneja, V. P. (2008). Modeling studies of ammonia dispersion and dry deposition at some hog farms in North Carolina. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 58, 1198–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. BC Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources (2005a). Digital geology map of British Columbia, Release 1.0. http://www.empr.gov.bc.ca/Mining/Geoscience/PublicationsCatalogue/DigitalGeologyMaps/Pages/default.aspx Accessed 5 May 2009.
  7. BC Ministry Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources (2005b). Service plans, C. Performance measures and targets, Goal #1. July 13, 2005.Google Scholar
  8. BC Ministry Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources (2009). Oil and gas industry reaches out to community. News Release 2009EMPR0016-000405.Google Scholar
  9. BC Ministry of Environment (2008). Guidelines for air quality dispersion modelling in British Columbia. Environmental Protection Division, Environmental Quality Branch, Air Protection Section, Victoria BC. 148 pp. http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/air/airquality/pdfs/air_disp_model_08.pdf Accessed 29 January 2009.
  10. BC Ministry of the Environment (2009a). Air quality online. http://a100.gov.bc.ca/pub/aqiis/aqi.bulletin?group_name=PRINCE_GEORGE Accessed 13 September 2009.
  11. BC Ministry of Environment (2009b). Air quality objectives and standards. http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/air/airquality/pdfs/aqotable.pdf Accessed 19 July 2009.
  12. Bernstein, J. A., Alexis, N., Barnes, C., Bernstein, I. L., Nel, A., & Peden, D. (2004). Health effects of air pollution. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 114, 1116–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bobbink, R., Ashmore, M., Braun, S., Fluckiger, W., & van den Wyngaert, I. (2002). Empirical nitrogen critical loads for natural and semi-natural ecosystems: 2002 update. Environmental Documentation 164, Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape CLC 2000 — Corine Land Cover, CEEA, Copenhagen, 2006.Google Scholar
  14. Briggs, G. A. (1969). Plume rise. Critical Review Series, U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, 81 pp. [NTIS TID-25075].Google Scholar
  15. British Columbia (2007). The BC energy plan — A vision for clean energy leadership. Policy Actions, Oil and Gas: Policies 36–55. http://www.energyplan.gov.bc.ca/PDF/BC_Energy_Plan_Oil_and_Gas.pdf Accessed 2 November 2007.
  16. Bytnerowicz, A., Dueck, T., & Godzik, S. (1998). Nitrogen oxides, nitric acid vapour, and ammonia. In R. B. Flager (Ed.), Recognition of air pollution injury to vegetation — A pictorial atlas. Pittsburgh, PA: Air and Water Management Association.Google Scholar
  17. Byun, D., & Schere, K. L. (2006). Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 59, 51–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Canada (2007a). Notice with respect to substances in the National Pollutant Release Inventory for 2006 — Amendment. Part I: Criteria for Reporting Substances Listed in Part 2 of Schedule 1. Department of the Environment, published under section 71(1)(b) of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act. Canada Gazette 141(9). Ottawa, ON. March 3, 2007; available at http://canadagazette.gc.ca/archives/p1/2007/2007-03-03/pdf/g1-14109.pdf Accessed 12 April 2009.
  19. Canada (2007b). Canada Gazette. Notice with respect to reporting of information on air pollutants, greenhouse gases and other substances for the 2006 calendar year. Part I 141(9) Supplement: Department of the Environment, published under section 71(1)(b) of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act. Canada Gazette 141(49). Ottawa, ON. December 9, 2007; available at http://canadagazette.gc.ca/archives/p1/2007/2007-12-08/pdf/g1-14149.pdf Accessed 21 June 2008.
  20. Carou, S., Dennis, I., Aherne, J., Ouimet, R., Arp, P. A., Watmough, S. A., et al. (2008). A national picture of acid deposition critical loads for forest soils in Canada. A report for the CCME Acid Rain Task Group. Winnipeg, MB: Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment.Google Scholar
  21. CCME (2009). Regional strategic environmental assessment in Canada: Principles and guidance. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment, Winnipeg, MB. http://www.ccme.ca/ourwork/environment.html?category_id=135 Accessed 29 July 2009.
  22. Clair, T. A., Dennis, I. F., & Cosby, B. J. (2003). Probable changes in lake chemistry in Canada's Atlantic Provinces under proposed North American emission reductions. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 7(4), 574–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dueck, T., & Elderson, J. (1992). Influence of NH3 and SO2 on the growth and competitive ability of Arnica montana L. and Viola canina L. The New Phytologist, 122(3), 507–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Duhamel, R. (1966). Treaty No. 8. Made June 21, 1899, and Adhesions, Reports, Etc. Queen's Printer and Controller of Stationary, Ottawa. http://www.ainc-inac.gc.ca/al/hts/tgu/pubs/t8/trty8-eng.asp Accessed 12 June 2009.
  25. Environment Canada (2008). 2008 Facility & Substance Information for SPECTRA ENERGY TRANSMISSION — McMahon Gas Plant http://www.ec.gc.ca/pdb/websol/querysite/facility_substance_summary_e.cfm?opt_npri_id=0000004305&opt_report_year=2008 Accessed 10 March 2010.
  26. Environment Canada (2009). Alternative threshold framework modelling proposal for the National Pollutant Release Inventory. http://www.ec.gc.ca/inrp-npri/default.asp?lang=en&n=94856B00-1 Accessed 10 March 2009.
  27. ERCB — Energy Resources Conservation Board of Alberta (2006). Directive 060: Upstream petroleum industry flaring, Incinerating and Venting. Calgary, Alberta: ERCB.Google Scholar
  28. Erisman, J. W., Van Pul, A., & Wyers, P. (1994). Parameterization of surface resistance for the quantification of atmospheric deposition of acidifying pollutants. Atmospheric Environment, 28(16), 2595–2607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fenn, M. E., Baron, J. S., Allen, E. B., Rueth, H. M., Nydick, K. R., Geiser, L., et al. (2003). Ecological effects of nitrogen deposition in the Western United States. Bioscience, 53(4), 404–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fenn, M. E., Jovan, S., Yuan, F., Geiser, L., Meixner, T., & Gimeni, B. S. (2008). Empirical and simulated critical loads for nitrogen deposition in California mixed conifer forests. Environmental Pollution, 155, 492–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Findlay, D. (2003). Response of phytoplankton communities to acidification and recovery in Killarney Park and the Experimental Lakes Area, Ontario. Ambio, 32, 190–195.Google Scholar
  32. Goward, T. (1999). The Lichens of British Columbia — Illustrated Keys — Part 2 — Fruticose Species. British Columbia Ministry of Forests Research Program, Special Report. 326 pp. Victoria, BC. http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfd/pubs/Docs/Srs/Srs09.pdf Accessed 28 August 2009.
  33. Guigard, S. E., Kindzierski, W. B., & Harper, N. (2000). Heat radiation from flares. Report prepared for Science and Technology Branch, Alberta Environment, ISBN 0-9985-1188-X, Edmonton Alberta.Google Scholar
  34. Hanna, S. R., Egan, B. A., Purdum, J., & Wagler, J. (2001). Evaluation of the ADMS, AEMROD, and ISC3 dispersion models with the OPTEX, Duke Forest, Kincaid, Indianapolis and Lovett filed datasets. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 16(1–6), 301–314.Google Scholar
  35. Henriksen, A., Dillon, P. J., & Aherne, J. (2002). Critical loads of acidity for surface waters and south-central Ontario, Canada: regional application of the steady-state water chemistry model. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 59, 1287–1295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Holopainen, T., & Karenlampi, L. (1984). Injuries to Lichen ultrastructure caused by sulphur dioxide fumigations. The New Phytologist, 98(2), 285–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hurley, P. J., Physick, W. L., & Luhar, A. K. (2005). TAPM: a practical approach to prognostic meteorological and air pollution modelling. Environmental Modelling and Software, 20, 737–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Isakov, V., Venkatram, A., Touma, J. S., Koracin, D., & Otte, T. L. (2007). Evaluating the use of outputs from comprehensive meteorological models in air quality modeling applications. Atmospheric Environment, 41, 1689–1705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kappen, L. (1989). Field measurements of carbon dioxide exchange of the Antarctic lichen Usnea sphacelata in the frozen state. Antarctic Science, 1(1), 31–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Karnosky, D. F., & Thakur, R. C. (2004). Genetic aspects of air pollution and climate change. In J. Burley, J. Evans, & J. Youngquist (Eds.), Encyclopedia of forest sciences (pp. 223–229). London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Katz, M., Ledingham, G. A., & McCallum, A. W. (1939). Symptoms of injury on forest and crop plants. In M. Katz & F. E. Lathe (Eds.), Effects of sulphur dioxide on vegetation. Prepared for the Associate Committee on Trail Smelter Smoke (pp. 51–103). Ottawa: National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  42. Krupa, S. V., & Kickert, R. N. (1997). Considerations for establishing relationships between ambient ozone (O3) and adverse crop response. Environmental Reviews, 5, 55–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Krupa, S. V., & Legge, A. H. (1999). Foliar injury symptoms of Saskatoon serviceberry (Amelanchier alnifolia Nutt.) as a biological indicator of ambient sulfur dioxide exposures. Environmental Pollution, 106, 449–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Krupa, S. V., Tonneijick, A. E. G., & Manning, W. J. (1998). Ozone. In R. B. Flager (Ed.), Recognition of air pollution injury to vegetation — A pictorial atlas (pp. 2-1–2-28). Pittsburgh, PA: Air and Waste Management Association.Google Scholar
  45. Krzyzanowski, J. (2009). The importance of policy in emissions inventory accuracy — A lesson from British Columbia, Canada. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 59, 430–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Krzyzanowski, J., & Innes, J. L. (2010). Back to the basics — Estimating the critical loads of acidity using traditional approaches. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 1227–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kumar, A., Dixit, S., Varadarajan, C., Vijayan, A., & Masuraha, A. (2006). Evaluation of the AERMOD dispersion model as a function of atmospheric stability for an urban area. Environmental Progress, 25(2), 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Legge, A. H. (1990). Chapter 2: Sulphur and nitrogen in the atmosphere. In A. H. Legge & S. V. Krups (Eds.), Acidic deposition sulphur and nitrogen oxides. The Alberta governemnt/industry acid deposition research program (pp. 3–128). Chelsea, MI: Lewis.Google Scholar
  49. Legge, A. (1995). An environmentally significant flare event from a sour gas processing plant: Proposed quantitative definitions. Prepared for Westcoast Energy Inc. Biosphere Solutions. Calgary, Alberta. February 11, 1995. www.ogc.gov.bc.ca/documents/publications/reports/biosphere%20solutions.doc Accessed 29 July 2009.
  50. Legge, A. H., Jäger, H.-J., & Krupa, S. (1998). Sulphur dioxide. In R. B. Flager (Ed.), Recognition of air pollution injury to vegetation — A pictorial atlas. Pittsburgh, PA: Air and Water Management Association.Google Scholar
  51. Lundgren, J. (2003). Dispersion analysis of flared sulphur dioxide emissions for the Kwoen Gas Processing Plant, 2002 Annual Report. Levelton Engineering. Prepared for Duke Energy Inc., Fort St. John, BC. 26 pp.Google Scholar
  52. Massey, N. W. D., MacIntyre, D. G., Desjardins, P. J., & Cooney, R. T. (2005). Digital map of British Columbia: Tile N10 Northeast B.C., B.C. Ministry of Energy and Mines, Geofile 2005-10. http://www.empr.gov.bc.ca/Mining/Geoscience/PublicationsCatalogue/DigitalGeologyMaps/Pages/default.aspx Accessed 17 May 2009.
  53. Massman, W. J. (1998). A review of the molecular diffusivities of H2O, CO2, CH4, CO, O3, SO2, NH3, N2O, NO, and NO2 in air and O2 and N2 near STP. Atmospheric Environment, 32(6), 1111–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McGuigan, E. K. (2006). Of moose and man: Collaborating to identify first nations' priorities for cumulative impact assessment in Northeast British Columbia. M.Sc. Thesis, Faculty of Graduate Studies, The University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  55. McLaughlin, D. (1998). A decade of forest tree monitoring in Canada: evidence of air pollution effects. Environmental Reviews, 6, 151–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Meidinger, D., & Pojar, J. (1991). Ecosystems of British Columbia. Victoria BC: BC Ministry of Forests. 330 pp.Google Scholar
  57. Menser, H. A., & Heggestad, H. E. (1966). Ozone and sulfur dioxide synergism: Injury to tobacco plants. Science, 153(3743), 424–425. doi:10.1126/science.153.3734.424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Meteorological Service of Canada (2009). Daily Observation Data, Canada's National Climate Archive, Fort St. John. http://www.climate.weatheroffice.ec.gc.ca/climateData/hourlydata_e.html?timeframe=1&Prov=BC&StationID=1413&Year=2000&Month=1&Day=1 Accessed 15 January 2009.
  59. Monks, P. S. (2000). A review of observation and origins of the spring ozone maximum. Atmospheric Environment, 24, 3545–3561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nihlgard, B. (1990). Relationship of forest damage to air pollution in the Nordic countries. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 50, 87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nilsson, J., & Grennfelt, P. (Eds.). (1988). Critical loads for sulphur and nitrogen: Miljörapport, 1988:15. Nordic Council of Ministers Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  62. OGC (2008). Oil and Gas Commission of British Columbia. Member login, Data Download. https://quoll.ogc.gov.bc.ca/generic_ogc/Ext_Accnt.Logon Accessed 25 March 2008.
  63. Ouimet, R., Arp, P. A., Watmough, S. A., Aherne, J., & Demerchant, I. (2006). Determination and mapping of critical loads of acidity and exceedance for upland forest soils in Eastern Canada. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 172, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Perry, S. G., Paine, R. F., Cimorelli, A. J., Venkatram, A., Lee, R. J., & Weil, J. C. (1994). AERMOD: A dispersion model for industrial source applications. Air and Waster Management Association. 94-TA23.04, For Presentation at the 87th Annual Meeting and Exhibition, Cincinnati, Ohio. June 19–24, 1994.Google Scholar
  65. Phillips, S. B., Pal Arya, S. P., Viney, V. P., & Aneja, P. (2004). Ammonia flux and dry deposition velocity from near-surface concentration gradient measurements over a grass surface in North Carolina. Atmospheric Environment, 38(21), 3469–3480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Reible, D. D. (1998). Fundamentals of environmental engineering. CRC Press, ISBN 1566700477, 9781566700474. pp. 243–246.Google Scholar
  67. Sander, R. (1999). Compilation of Henry's Law constants for inorganic and organic species of potential importance in environmental chemistry (version 3). http://www.mpchmainz.mpg.de/Bsander/res/henry.html Accessed 17 March 2009.
  68. Schofield, E., & Hamilton, W. L. (1970). Probable damage to tundra biota through sulphur dioxide destruction of lichens. Biological Conservation, 2(4), 278–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Science Applications International Corporation (2004). EPA Spatial Allocator User Guide. William Benjey, Thomas Pierce, and Dan Loughlin. United States Environmental Protection Agency National Exposure Research Laboratory Office of Research and Development Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. 44 pp. http://www.ie.unc.edu/cempd/projects/mims/spatial/Spatial_Allocator_UG.pdf Accessed 2 March 2009.
  70. Soil Landscapes of Canada Working Group (2005). Soil Landscapes of Canada v3.0. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (digital map and database at 1:1 million scale). http://sis.agr.gc.ca/cansis/nsdb/slc/v3.0/intro.html Accessed 12 June 2008.
  71. Tallis, J. H. (1964). Lichens and atmospheric pollution. Advancement of Science, 21, 250–252.Google Scholar
  72. Tonnesen, G., Wang, Z., Omary, M., & Chien, C. J. (2007). Assessment of nitrogen deposition: Modeling and habitat assessment. California Energy Commission, PIER Energy-Related Environmental Research. CEC-500-2005-032.Google Scholar
  73. UNECE-CLRTAP (2004). United Nations Economic Commission — Convention on long-range transboundary air pollution. Manual on methodologies and criteria for modelling and mapping critical loads and levels, and air pollution effects and trends, Berlin, Germany, 202 pp. http://icpmapping.org/cms/zeigeBereich/5/manual_und_downloads.html Accessed 11 June 2008.
  74. US-EPA (2004). AERMOD Deposition AlgorithmsScience Document (Revised Draft). http://www.epa.gov/scram001/7thconf/aermod/aer_scid.pdf Accessed 12 July 2009.
  75. van Dobben, H. F., Wolterbeek, H Th, Wamelink, G. W. W., & Ter Braak, C. J. F. (2001). Relationship between epiphytic lichens, trace elements and gaseous atmospheric pollutants. Environmental Pollution, 112, 163–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Vingarzan, R. (2004). A review of surface ozone background levels and trends. Atmospheric Environment, 38, 3431–3442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wesely, M. L. (2007). Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models. Atmospheric Environment, 41, S52–S63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Willis, G. E., & Deardorff, J. W. (1981). A laboratory study of dispersion in the middle of the convectively mixed boundary layer. Atmospheric Environment, 15, 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zhang, L., Brook, J. R., & Vet, R. (2003). A revised parameterization for gaseous dry deposition in air-quality models. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 3(6), 2067–2082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Forest Resources ManagementThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations