Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Treatment of Hydroponics Wastewater Using Constructed Wetlands in Winter Conditions

  • 795 Accesses

  • 30 Citations

Abstract

Hydroponics culture generates large amounts of wastewater that are highly concentrated in nitrate and phosphorus but contains almost no organic carbon. Constructed wetlands (CWs) have been proposed to treat this type of effluent, but little is known about the performance of these systems in treating hydroponic wastewater. In addition, obtaining satisfactory winter performances from CWs operated in cold climates remains a challenge, as biological pathways are often slowed down or inhibited. The main objective of this study was to assess the effect of plant species (Typha sp., Phragmites australis, and Phalaris arundinacea) and the addition of organic carbon on nutrient removal in winter. The experimental setup consisted of 16 subsurface flow CW mesocosms (1 m2, HRT of 3 days) fed with 30 L d1 of synthetic hydroponics wastewater, with half of the mesocosms fed with an additional source of organic carbon (sucrose). Carbon addition had a significant impact on nitrate and phosphate removal, with removal means of 4.9 g m-2 d-1 of NO3-N and 0.5 g m-2 d-1 of PO4-P. Planted mesocosms were generally more efficient than unplanted controls. Furthermore, we found significant differences among plant treatments for NO3-N (highest removal with P. arundinacea) and COD (highest removal with P. australis/Typha sp.). Overall, planted wetlands with added organic carbon represent the best combination to treat hydroponics wastewater during the winter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

References

  1. American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association (AWWA), and Water Environment Federation (WEF). (1998). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.

  2. Brisson, J., & Chazarenc, F. (2009). Maximizing pollutant removal in constructed wetlands: should we pay more attention to macrophyte species selection? Science of the Total Environment, 407, 3923–3930.

  3. Brix, H. (1997). Do macrophytes play a role in constructed treatment wetlands? Water Science and Technology, 35, 11–17.

  4. Gachter, R., & Meyer, J. S. (1993). The role of microorganisms in mobilization and fixation of phosphorus in sediments. Hydrobiologia, 253, 103–121.

  5. Gagnon, V., Chazarenc, F., Comeau, Y., & Brisson, J. (2007). Influence of macrophyte species on microbial density and activity in constructed wetlands. Water Science and Technology, 56, 249–254.

  6. Grasselly, D., Merlin, G., Sédilot, C., Vanel, F., Dufour, G., & Rosso, L. (2005). Denitrification of soilless tomato crops run-off water by horizontal subsurface constructed wetlands. Acta Horticulturae, 691, 329–332.

  7. Her, J.-J., & Huang, J.-S. (1995). Influences of carbon source and C/N ratio on nitrate/nitrite denitrification and carbon breakthrough. Bioresource Technology, 54, 45–51.

  8. Huett, D. O., Morris, S. G., Smith, G., & Hunt, N. (2005). Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from plant nursery runoff in vegetated and unvegetated subsurface flow wetlands. Water Research, 39, 3259–3272.

  9. Kadlec, R. H., & Wallace, S. (2008). Treatment wetlands (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

  10. Koide, S., & Satta, N. (2004). Separation performance of ion-exchange membranes for electrolytes in drainage nutrient solutions subjected to electrodialysis. Biosystems Engineering, 87, 89–97.

  11. Lin, Y. F., Jing, S. R., Wang, T. W., & Lee, D. Y. (2002). Effects of macrophytes and external carbon sources on nitrate removal from groundwater in constructed wetlands. Environmental Pollution, 119, 413–420.

  12. Michaud, L., Blancheton, J. P., Bruni, V., & Piedrahita, R. (2006). Effect of particulate organic carbon on heterotrophic bacterial populations and nitrification efficiency in biological filters. Aquacultural Engineering, 34, 224–233.

  13. Ouellet-Plamondon, C., Chazarenc, F., Comeau, Y., & Brisson, J. (2006). Artificial aeration to increase pollutant removal efficiency of constructed wetlands in cold climate. Ecological Engineering, 27, 258–264.

  14. Park, J. B. K., Craggs, R. J., & Sukias, J. P. S. (2008). Treatment of hydroponic wastewater by denitrification filters using plant prunings as the organic carbon source. Bioresource Technology, 99, 2711–2716.

  15. Prystay, W., & Lo, K. V. (2001). Treatment of greenhouse wastewater using constructed wetlands. Journal of Environmental Science and Health. Part B: Pesticides, Food Contaminants, and Agricultural Wastes, 36, 341–353.

  16. Quinn, G. P., & Keough, M. J. (2003). Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  17. Riley, K. A., Stein, O. R., & Hook, P. B. (2005). Ammonium removal in constructed wetland microcosms as influenced by season and organic carbon load. Journal of Environmental Science and Health. Part A-Toxic/Hazardous Substances & Environmental Engineering, 40, 1109–1121.

  18. Rousseau, D. P. L., Vanrolleghem, P. A., & De Pauw, N. (2004). Model-based design of horizontal subsurface flow constructed treatment wetlands: a review. Water Research, 38, 1484–1493.

  19. Sirivedhin, T., & Gray, K. A. (2006). Factors affecting denitrification rates in experimental wetlands: field and laboratory studies. Ecological Engineering, 26, 167–181.

  20. Stottmeister, U., Wiessner, A., Kuschk, P., Kappelmeyer, U., Kastner, M., Bederski, O., et al. (2003). Effects of plants and microorganisms in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. Biotechnology Advances, 22, 93–117.

  21. Tanner, C. C., Kadlec, R. H., Gibbs, M. M., Sukias, J. P. S., & Nguyen, M. L. (2002). Nitrogen processing gradients in subsurface-flow treatment wetlands—influence of wastewater characteristics. Ecological Engineering, 18, 499–520.

  22. van Rijn, J., Tal, Y., & Schreier, H. J. (2006). Denitrification in recirculating systems: theory and applications. Aquacultural Engineering, 34, 364–376.

  23. Vymazal, J. (2007). Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Science of the Total Environment, 380, 48–65.

  24. Watson, J. T., Reed, S. C., Kadlec, R. H., Knight, R. L., & Whitehouse, A. E. (1989). Performance expectations and loading rates for constructed wetlands. In D. A. Hammer (Ed.), Constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment (pp. 319–352). Michigan: Lewis Publishers.

  25. Wiessner, A., Kuschk, P., Kastner, M., & Stottmeister, U. (2002). Abilities of helophyte species to release oxygen into rhizospheres with varying redox conditions in laboratory-scale hydroponic systems. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 4, 1–15.

  26. Zhu, T., & Sikora, F. J. (1995). Ammonium and nitrate removal in vegetated and unvegetated gravel bed microcosm wetlands. Water Science and Technology, 32, 219–228.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Audrey Forthomme and Marina Duarte for their technical assistance in greenhouse and laboratory work. This project was funded by “Les Amis du Jardin botanique de Montréal”.

Author information

Correspondence to Jacques Brisson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gagnon, V., Maltais-Landry, G., Puigagut, J. et al. Treatment of Hydroponics Wastewater Using Constructed Wetlands in Winter Conditions. Water Air Soil Pollut 212, 483–490 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-010-0362-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Constructed wetlands
  • Hydroponics wastewater
  • Macrophyte species
  • Nitrate removal
  • Organic carbon addition