Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, 204:155 | Cite as

Activated Carbon Adsorption of Fuel Oxygenates MTBE and ETBE from Water

  • Fikret Inal
  • Senem Yetgin
  • Gulsum T. Aksu
  • Selvi Simsek
  • Aysun Sofuoglu
  • Sait C. Sofuoglu
Article

Abstract

The aqueous phase adsorption of fuel oxygenates methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) and ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE) onto commercially available granular activated carbon (GAC; Norit GAC 1240) was investigated in a batch system at 27°C. The oxygenate concentrations were determined by headspace gas chromatography/mass spectrometry analyses. The experimental data were used with four two-parameter isotherm models (Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin, and Dubinin–Radushkevich) and two kinetic models (pseudo first-order and pseudo second-order) to determine equilibrium and kinetic parameters. Considering the correlation coefficient and root mean square error, Dubinin–Radushkevich isotherm showed better fit with the equilibrium data for MTBE. However, the performances of Langmuir and Dubinin–Radushkevich models were comparable for ETBE. The adsorption capacities were calculated as 5.50 and 6.92 mg/g for MTBE and ETBE, respectively, at an equilibrium solution concentration of 1 mg/L using Dubinin–Radushkevich isotherm. The differences between the model predictions and experimental data were similar for the pseudo first-order and pseudo second-order kinetic models. Gibbs free-energy changes of adsorption were found to be −22.59 and −28.55 kJ/mol for MTBE–GAC and ETBE–GAC systems, respectively, under the experimental conditions studied.

Keywords

Adsorption Fuel oxygenate MTBE ETBE 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by the Technical and Scientific Research Council of Turkey (MISAG-269) and the Izmir Institute of Technology (IZTECH) Research Fund (2004-IYTE 16). We would like to thank Izmir Regional Institute of Hygiene, IZTECH Environmental Research Center, and IZTECH Center for Material Research for their technical assistance.

References

  1. Achten, C., Kolb, A., & Puttmann, W. (2002). Occurrence of methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) in riverbank filtered water and drinking water produced by riverbank filtration. 2. Environmental Science & Technology, 36(17), 3662–3670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, M. A. (2000). Removal of MTBE and other organic contaminants from water by sorption to high silica zeolites. Environmental Science & Technology, 34(4), 725–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Annesini, M. C., Gironi, F., & Monticelli, B. (2000). Removal of oxygenated pollutants from wastewater by polymeric resins: data on adsorption equilibrium and kinetics in fixed beds. Water Research, 34(11), 2989–2996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. API (American Petroleum Institute) (2000). Strategies for characterizing subsurface releases of gasoline containing MTBE. Publication No: API 4699.Google Scholar
  5. Bi, E., Haderlein, S. B., & Schmidt, T. C. (2005). Sorption of tert-butyl ether (MTBE) and tert-butyl alcohol (TBA) to synthetic resins. Water Research, 39, 4164–4176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Centi, G., Grande, A., & Perathoner, S. (2002). Catalytic conversion of MTBE to biodegradable chemicals in contaminated water. Catalysis Today, 75, 69–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Church, C. D., Isabelle, L. M., Pankow, J. F., Rose, D. L., et al. (1997). Method for determination of methyl tert-butyl ether and its degradation products in water. Environmental Science & Technology, 31(12), 3723–3726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, S. W., & Powers, S. E. (2000). Alternative sorbents for removing MTBE from gasoline-contaminated ground water. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 126(4), 354–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dewsbury, P., Thornton, S. F., & Lerner, D. N. (2003). Improved analysis of MTBE, TAME, and TBA in petroleum fuel-contaminated groundwater by SPME using deuterated internal standards with GC-MS. Environmental Science & Technology, 37(7), 1392–1397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. EC (European Communities) (2002). European Union Risk Assessment Report—Tert-Butyl Methyl Ether.Google Scholar
  11. Erdem-Senatalar, A., Bergendahl, J. A., Giaya, A., & Thompson, R. W. (2004). Adsorption of methyl tertiary butyl ether on hydrophobic molecular sieves. Environmental Engineering Science, 21(6), 722–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gimeno, O., Plucinski, P., Kolaczkowski, S. T., Rivas, F. J., et al. (2003). Removal of the herbicide MCPA by commercial activated carbons: Equilibrium, kinetics, and reversibility. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Reseasrch, 42, 1076–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gunay, A., Arslankaya, E., & Tosun, I. (2007). Lead removal from aqueous solution by natural and pretreated clinoptilolite: adsorption equilibrium and kinetics. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 146, 362–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hong, S., Duttweiler, C. M., & Lemley, A. T. (1999). Analysis of methyl tert-butyl ether and its degradation products by direct aqueous injection onto gas chromatography with mass spectrometry or flame ionization detection systems. Journal of Chromatography A, 857, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hung, H. W., & Lin, T. F. (2006). Adsorption of MTBE from contaminated water by carbonaceous resins and mordenite zeolite. Journal of Hazardous Materials, B135, 210–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li, L., Quinlivan, P. A., & Knappe, D. R. U. (2002). Effects of activated carbon surface chemistry and pore structure on the adsorption of organic contaminants from aqueous solution. Carbon, 40, 2085–2100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li, S., Tuan, V. A., Noble, R. D., & Falconer, J. L. (2003). MTBE adsorption on all-silica β zeolite. Environmental Science & Technology, 37(17), 4007–4010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lin, S. H., Wang, C. S., & Chang, C. H. (2002). Removal of methyl tert-butyl ether from contaminated water by macroreticular resin. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 41, 4116–4121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lin, Z., Wilson, J. T., & Fine, D. D. (2003). Avoiding hydrolysis of fuel ether oxygenates during static headspace analysis. Environmental Science & Technology, 37(21), 4994–5000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Milonjic, S. K. (2007). A consideration of the correct calculation of thermodynamic parameters of adsorption. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, 72(12), 1363–1367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Piazza, F., Barbieri, A., Violante, F. S., & Roda, A. (2001). A rapid and sensitive method for methyl tert-butyl ether analysis in water samples by use of solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Chemosphere, 44, 539–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Quinlivan, P. A., Li, L., & Knappe, D. R. U. (2005). Effects of activated carbon characteristics on the simultaneous adsorption of aqueous organic micropollutants and natural organic matter. Water Research, 39, 1663–1673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosell, M., Lacorte, S., Ginebreda, A., & Barcelo, D. (2003). Simultaneous determination of methyl tert-butyl ether and its degradation products, other gasoline oxygenates and benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes in Catalonian groundwater by purge-and-trap-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Journal of Chromatography A, 995, 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schirmer, M., Effenberger, M., & Weiss, H. (2002). The impact of the gasoline additive methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE) on groundwater: a German perspective. In S. F. Thornton & E. Oswald (Eds.), Groundwater quality: Natural and enhanced restoration of groundwater pollution (pp 567–570). Wallingford: IAHS Publication.Google Scholar
  25. Shih, T. C., Wangpaichitr, M., & Suffet, M. (2003). Evaluation of granular activated carbon technology for the removal of methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) from drinking water. Water Research, 37, 375–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Steffan, R. J., McClay, K., Vainberg, S., Condee, C. W., et al. (1997). Biodegradation of the gasoline oxygenates methyl tert-butyl ether, ethyl tert-butyl ether, and tert-amyl methyl ether by propane-oxidizing bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 63(11), 4216–4222.Google Scholar
  27. Sutherland, J., Adams, C., & Kekobad, J. (2004). Treatment of MTBE by air stripping, carbon adsorption, and advanced oxidation: technical and economic comparison for five groundwaters. Water Research, 38, 193–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sutherland, J., Adams, C., & Kekobad, J. (2005). Treatability of alternative fuel oxygenates using advanced oxidation, air stripping, and carbon adsorption. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 131(4), 623–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Urkiaga, A., Bolano, N., & De Las Fuentes, L. (2002). Removal of micropollutants in aqueous streams by organophilic pervaporation. Desalination, 149, 55–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (1997). Drinking water advisory-consumer acceptability advice and health effects analysis on methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE). EPA-822-F-97-009.Google Scholar
  31. US EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (2000). Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE): Advance notice of intent to initiate rulemaking under the Toxic Substances Control Act to eliminate or limit the use of MTBE as a fuel additive in gasoline; Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. Federal Register, 65(N 58), 16093–16109.Google Scholar
  32. USGS (U.S. Geological Survey), U.S. Department of the Interior (2001). MTBE and other volatile organic compounds—New findings and implications on the quality of source waters used for drinking-water supplies. Report FS-105-01.Google Scholar
  33. Wilhelm, M. J., Adams, V. D., Curtis, J. G., & Middlebrooks, E. J. (2002). Carbon adsorption and air-stripping removal of MTBE from river water. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 128(9), 813–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yu, L., Adams, C., & Ludlow, D. (2005). Adsorption isotherms for methyl tert-butyl ether and other fuel oxygenates on two bituminous-coal activated carbons. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 131(6), 983–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zwank, L., Schmidt, T. C., Haderlein, S. B., & Berg, M. (2002). Simultaneous detection of fuel oxygenates and BTEX using direct aqueous injection gas chromatography mass spectrometry (DAI-GC/MS). Environmental Science & Technology, 36(9), 2054–2059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fikret Inal
    • 1
  • Senem Yetgin
    • 1
  • Gulsum T. Aksu
    • 1
  • Selvi Simsek
    • 1
  • Aysun Sofuoglu
    • 1
  • Sait C. Sofuoglu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringIzmir Institute of TechnologyIzmirTurkey

Personalised recommendations