Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 201, Issue 1–4, pp 239–251 | Cite as

Model Analysis of PM10 Concentration Variations Over a Mineral Products Industrial Area in Saraburi, Thailand

  • Sittichai PimonsreeEmail author
  • Prungchan Wongwises
  • Rudklao Pan-Aram
  • Meigen Zhang


Air pollution associated with particulate matters is a serious problem in the mineral products industrial area (MPIA) in Saraburi, central Thailand. PM10 concentrations monitored at Nah Phra Laan station located in the MPIA show that PM10 levels exhibit strong seasonal variations; the number of days in 2005 that PM10 concentrations exceeded the daily National Ambient Air Quality Standard of 120 μg/m3 were 58%, 29%, and 12% in the winter, rainy, and summer seasons, respectively. In this paper, the Hybrid Particle And Concentration Transport (HYPACT) model with meteorological fields from the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS) was applied to Saraburi to investigate the impacts of meteorological parameters upon seasonal variations in PM10 concentration. Analysis of model results shows that daily average PM10 concentrations exceeding 200 μg/m3 are found in the downwind direction of emission sources and their horizontal gradients are strong. Hourly PM10 concentrations exhibit obvious diurnal variation with maximum values in wintertime at around 2000–2100 local standard time in association with low ventilation with light wind speed and weak vertical mixing, while in the rainy season, they are generally higher in the daytime than in the nighttime, as that mixing height in cloudy days is low in daytime whereas emission rates are high during working time.


PM10 Dispersion model Saraburi Mineral products industry 



This study was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (grant no. 2007CB407303), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 40533018), and the Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment (JGSEE), King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi. Special thanks are offered to the Pollution Control Department and Thai Meteorological Department for data support and the Institute of Atmospheric Physic for the computer resource and working facilities. We also thank Dr. Kasemsan Manomaiphiboon (JGSEE) for some useful technical comments.


  1. Baggott, S., Cai, X., McGregor, G., & Harrison, R. M. (2006). Model simulation of meteorology and air quality during the summer PUMA intensive measurement campaign in the UK West Midlands conurbation. The Science of the Total Environment, 360, 26–42. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.08.054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barna, M. G., & Gimson, N. R. (2002). Dispersion modelling of a wintertime particulate pollution episode in Christchurch, New Zealand. Atmospheric Environment, 36(21), 3531–3544. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00296-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang, J. C., & Hanna, S. R. (2004). Air quality model performance evaluation. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 87, 167–196. doi: 10.1007/s00703-003-0070-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chattopadhyay, B. P., Gangopadhyay, P. K., Bandopadhyay, T. S., & Alam, J. (2006). Comparison of pulmonary function test abnormalities between stone crushing dust exposed and nonexposed agricultural workers. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine, 11, 191–198. doi: 10.1007/BF02905278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chawana, S. (1999). Health effect of particulate matter air pollution in Nah Phra Laan community, Saraburi province. Kasetsart University, Bangkok.Google Scholar
  6. Cotton, W. R., Sr, R. A. P., Walko, R. L., Liston, G. E., Tremback, C. J., Jiang, H., et al. (2003). RAMS 2001: current status and future directions. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 82, 5–29. doi: 10.1007/s00703-001-0584-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Department of Primary Industries and Mines (2007). Crushed stone plants in Thailand. Retrieved from
  8. Hanna, S. R., & Yang, R. (2001). Evaluations of mesoscale models’ simulations of near-surface winds, temperature gradients, and mixing depths. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 40, 1095–1104. doi: 10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<1095:EOMMSO>2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Holmes, N. S., & Morawska, L. (2006). A review of dispersion modelling and its application to the dispersion of particles: an overview of different dispersion models available. Atmospheric Environment, 40(30), 5902–5928. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.06.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Houthuijs, D., Breugelmans, O., Hoek, G., Vaskovi, E., Mihalikova, E., Pastuszka, J. S., et al. (2001). PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations in Central and Eastern Europe: results from the Cesar study. Atmospheric Environment, 35(15), 2757–2771. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00123-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Karl, B., Schnelle, J., & Dey, P. R. (2000). Atmospheric dispersion modeling compliance guide. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  12. Khanitta, P.-A. (2001). Stochastic study of fugitive dust concentration from stone-processing plants at Nah Phra Laan using Monte-Carlo simulation of ISCST3 model. Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok.Google Scholar
  13. Kuhlbusch, T. A. J., John, A. C., & Fissan, H. (2001). Diurnal variations of aerosol characteristics at a rural measuring site close to the Ruhr-Area, Germany. Atmospheric Environment, 35(Supplement 1), 13–21. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00489-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lompong, S., Chaikittiporn, C., & Tiramanus, T. (2002). Effect of PM concentrations on health of students in the school near crushed stone plant in eastern Thailand. Burapha University, Chonburi.Google Scholar
  15. McMurry, P. H., Shepherd, M. F., & Vickery, J. S. (2004). Particulate matter science for polily makers. UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Moondee, S., Phewnil, O., Bualert, S., & Jiamjarasragsi, W. (2004). Prevalence of respiratory symptoms and lung function of students in rock-crushing industrial area, Saraburi province. Thailand Journal of Health Promotion and Environmental Health, 93–101.Google Scholar
  17. Pielke, R. A., Cotton, W. R., Walko, R. L., Tremback, C. J., Lyons, W. A., Grasso, L. D., et al. (1992). A comprehensive meteorological modeling system—RAMS. Meteorology and Atmospheric Physics, 49, 69–91. doi: 10.1007/BF01025401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pollution Control Department (2006). Project of study on problem and impact of PM 10 in Saraburi; surveying pollutant, measuring and developing database of PM 10 emission sources in Nah Phra Laan. Bangkok: Pollution Control Department.Google Scholar
  19. Seaman, N. L. (2000). Meteorological modeling for air-quality assessments. Atmospheric Environment, 34(12–14), 2231–2259. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00466-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sivacoumar, R., Jayabalou, R., Swarnalatha, S., & Balakrishnan, K. (2006). Particulate matter from stone crushing industry: size distribution and health effects. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 132, 405–414. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2006)132:3(405).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stenchikov, G., Lahoti, N., J.Diner, D., Kahn, R., J.Lioy, P., & Georgopoulos, P. G. (2006). Multiscale plume transport from the collapse of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 6, 425–450. doi: 10.1007/s10652-006-9001-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Surachai, S., Prungchan, W., Rudklao, P.-A., & Meigen, Z. (2006). Carbon monoxide emission and concentration models for Chiang Mai urban area. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 23, 901–908. doi: 10.1007/s00376-006-0901-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Totten, L. A., Stenchikov, G., Gigliotti, C. L., Lahoti, N., & Eisenreich, S. J. (2006). Measurement and modeling of urban atmospheric PCB concentrations on a small (8 km) spatial scale. Atmospheric Environment, 40(40), 7940–7952. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.07.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Walko, R. L., Tremback, C. J., & Bell, M. J. (2001). The RAMS HYbrid Particle And Concentration Transport model (HYPACT). Atmospheric, Meteorological, and Environmental Technologies. Retrieved October 22, 2007 from
  25. Zhang, M., Uno, I., Yoshida, Y., Xu, Y., Wang, Z., Akimoto, H., et al. (2004). Transport and transformation of sulfur compounds over East Asia during the TRACE-P and ACE-Asia campaigns. Atmospheric Environment, 38(40), 6947–6959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sittichai Pimonsree
    • 1
    Email author
  • Prungchan Wongwises
    • 1
  • Rudklao Pan-Aram
    • 2
  • Meigen Zhang
    • 3
  1. 1.The Joint Graduate School of Energy and EnvironmentKing Mongkut’s University of Technology ThonburiBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Electricity Generating Authority of ThailandNonthaburiThailand
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric PhysicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations