Phytoextraction of Heavy Metals by Eight Plant Species in the Field
- 1.2k Downloads
Phytoremediation is an in situ, cost-effective potential strategy for cleanup of sites contaminated with trace metals. Selection of plant materials is an important factor for successful field phytoremediation. A field experiment was carried out to evaluate the phytoextraction abilities of six high biomass plants (Vertiveria zizanioides, Dianthus chinensis, Rumex K-1 (Rumex upatientia × R. timschmicus), Rumex crispus, and two populations of Rumex acetosa) in comparison to metal hyperaccumulators (Viola baoshanensis, Sedum alfredii). The paddy fields used in the experiment were contaminated with Pb, Zn, and Cd. Our results indicated that V. baoshanensis accumulated 28 mg kg−1 Cd and S. alfredii accumulated 6,279 mg kg−1 Zn (dry weight) in shoots, with bioconcentration factors up to 4.8 and 6.3, respectively. The resulting total extractions of V. baoshanensis and S. alfredii were 0.17 kg ha−1 for Cd and 32.7 kg ha−1 for Zn, respectively, with one harvest without any treatment. The phytoextraction rates of V. baoshanensis and S. alfredii for Cd and Zn were 0.88 and 1.15%, respectively. Among the high biomass plants, R. crispus extracted Zn and Cd of 26.8 and 0.16 kg ha−1, respectively, with one harvest without any treatment, so it could be a candidate species for phytoextraction of Cd and Zn from soil. No plants were proved to have the ability to phytoextract Pb with high efficiency.
KeywordsPhytoextraction Heavy metals Bioconcentration factor Field study Viola baoshanensis Phytoextraction efficiency
This work was supported by the National ‘‘863’’ Project of China (no. 2001AA645010-3) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 40471117 and no. 30100024), and Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation (no. 94022).
- Allen, S. E. (1989). Chemical analysis of ecological materials (2nd edn.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Baker, A. J. M., McGrath, S. P., Reeves, R. D., & Smith, J. A. C. (2000). Metal hyperaccumulator plants: A review of the ecology and physiology of a biological resource for phytoremediation of metal-polluted soils. In N. Terry & Q. Banuelos (Eds.), Phytoremediation of contaminated soil and water (pp. 85–197). Boca Raton, FL: Lewis.Google Scholar
- Chaney, R. L., Li, Y. M., Brown, S. L., Homer, F. A., Malik, M., Angle, J. S., et al. (2000). Improving metal hyperaccumulator wild plants to develop commercial phytoextraction systems: Approaches and progress. In N. Terry, G. Banuelos, & J. Vangronsveld (Eds.), Phytoremediation of contaminated soil and water (pp. 129–158). , Boca Raton, Washington DC: Lewis.Google Scholar
- Escarré, J., Lefebre, C., Gruber, W., LeBlanc, M., Lepart, J., Riviere, Y., et al. (2000). Zinc and cadmium hyperaccumulation by Thlaspi caerulescens from metalliferous and nonmetalliferous sites in Mediteranean area: Implications for phytoremediation. New Phytologist, 145, 429–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hulina, N., & Dumija, L. (1995). Heavy metals in the weeds of Posavina. Poljoprivredna Znanstvena Smotra, 60, 95–103.Google Scholar
- McGrath, S. P., Dunham, S. J., & Correll, R. L. (2000). Potential for phytoextraction of zinc and cadmium from soils using hyperaccumulator plants. In N. Terry, G. Banuelos, & J. Vangronsveld (Eds.), Phytoremediation of contaminated soil and water (pp. 109–128). Boca Raton, USA: Lewis.Google Scholar
- Page, A. L., Miller, R. H., & Keener, D. R. (1982). Methods of soil analysis. Part 2, Chemical and microbiological properties (2nd ed.), Agronomy No. 9. Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar