Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 184, Issue 1–4, pp 49–61

Geochemistry of Coalbed Natural Gas (CBNG) Produced Water in Powder River Basin, Wyoming: Salinity and Sodicity



Extraction of natural gas from a confined coal aquifer requires the pumping of large amounts of groundwater, commonly referred to as produced water. Produced water from the extraction of coalbed natural gas is typically disposed into nearby constructed discharge ponds. The objective of this study was to collect produced water samples at outfalls and corresponding discharge ponds and monitor pH, electrical conductivity (EC), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), sodium (Na), and alkalinity. Outfalls and corresponding discharge ponds were sampled from five different watersheds including Cheyenne River (CHR), Belle Fourche River (BFR), Little Powder River (LPR), Powder River (PR), and Tongue River (TR) within the Powder River Basin (PRB), Wyoming from 2003 to 2005. From Na, Ca, and Mg measurements, sodium adsorption ratios (SAR) were calculated, and used in a regression model. Results suggest that outfalls are chemically different from corresponding discharge ponds. Sodium, alkalinity, and pH all tend to increase, possibly due to environmental factors such as evaporation, while Ca decreased from outfalls to associated discharge ponds due to calcite precipitation. Watersheds examined in this study were chemically different form each other and most discharge ponds with in individual watersheds tended to increase in Na and SAR from 2003 to 2005. Since discharge pond water was chemically changing as a function of watershed chemistry, we predicted SAR of discharge pond water using a regression model. The predicted discharge pond water results suggested a high correlation (R2 = 0.83) to discharge well SAR. Overall, results of this study will be useful for landowners, water quality managers, and industry in properly managing produced water from the natural gas extraction.


Natural gas CBNG produced waters Salts Sodium Adsorption Ratio Sodicity Salinity Irrigation 


  1. American Public Health Association. (1992). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, D. S., & Allison, J. D. (1992). MINTEQA2: An equilibrium metal speciation model. Athens, Georgia: Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  3. Chatterjee, S., Hadi, A. S., & Price, B. (2000). Regression analysis by example (3rd ed., pp. 204–216). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. DeBruin, R. H., Lyman, R. M., Jones, R. W., & Cook, L. W. (2000). Coalbed methane development in Wyoming. Information pamphlet number 7. Laramie, WY: Wyoming State Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  5. Drever, J. I. (1997). The geochemistry of natural waters, surface and groundwater environments (pp. 41–58). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Hanson, B., Grattan, S. R., & Fulton, A. (1993). Agricultural salinity and drainage: A handbook for water managers. Davis, CA: University of California Irrigation Program, University of California.Google Scholar
  7. Mace, J. E., & Amerhein, C. (2001). Leaching and reclamation of a soil irrigated with moderate SAR waters. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 65, 199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McBeth, I. H., Reddy, K. J., & Skinner, Q. D. (2003a). Chemistry of coalbed methane product water in three Wyoming watersheds. Journal of American Water Resources Association, 39, 575–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McBeth, I. H., Reddy, K. J., & Skinner, Q. D. (2003b). Chemistry of trace elements in coalbed methane product water. Journal of Water Research, 37, 884–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Minitab. (2000). MINITAB 13.1. State College, PA: Minitab, Inc.Google Scholar
  11. Patz, M. J., Reddy, K. J., & Skinner, Q. D. (2004). Chemistry of coalbed methane discharge water interacting with semi-arid ephemeral stream changes. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 40, 1247–1255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Rice, C. A., Ellis, M. S., & Bullock, J. H. Jr. (2000). Water co-produced with coalbed methane in the Powder River Basin, Wyoming: Preliminary compositional data. Open-File Report 00-372. Denver, CO: U.S. Geological Survey.Google Scholar
  13. Ruckelshaus Institute of Environment and Natural Resources (RIENR). (2005). Water production from coalbed methane development in Wyoming: A summary of quantity, quality and management. Final Report to Wyoming State Governor. Retrieved from http://www.uwyo.edu/enr/ienr/cbm.asp.
  14. SAS (SAS Institute). (2000). SAS proprietary software release 9.0. Raleigh, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
  15. Sposito, S., & Mattigod, S. V. (1977). On the chemical foundation of the sodium adsorption ratio. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 41, 323–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Strumm, W., & Morgan, J. J. (1996). Aquatic chemistry, chemical equilibria and rates in natural waters (3rd ed., p. 591). Canada: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management. (2003). Final environmental impact statement and proposed plan amendment for the Powder River Basin oil and gas project. Volumes 1–3. Buffalo, WY: Buffalo Field Office.Google Scholar
  18. U.S. Department of Interior, Geological Survey. (1986). Hydrology of area 50, Northern Great Plains and Rocky Mountain Coal Provinces, Wyoming and Montana. Water Resources Investigations Open-File Report 83–545.Google Scholar
  19. Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality. (2001). SAP: Water quality rules and regulations, chapter 1. Cheyenne, WY: Department of Environmental Quality and Water Quality Division.Google Scholar
  20. Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality. (2006). NPDES Permitting, Water Quality Division. Retrieved 1/11/06, from http://deq.state.wy.us/wqd/npdes/.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Renewable ResourcesUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA

Personalised recommendations