Characterizing Dry Deposition of Mercury in Urban Runoff
- 146 Downloads
Stormwater runoff from urban surfaces often contains elevated levels of toxic metals. When discharged directly into water bodies, these pollutants degrade water quality and impact aquatic life and human health. In this study, the composition of impervious surface runoff and associated rainfall was investigated for several storm events at an urban site in Orlando, Florida. Total mercury in runoff consisted of 58% particulate and 42% filtered forms. Concentration comparisons at the start and end of runoff events indicate that about 85% of particulate total mercury and 93% of particulate methylmercury were removed from the surface before runoff ended. Filtered mercury concentrations showed less than 50% reduction of both total and methylmercury from first flush to final flush. Direct comparison between rainfall and runoff at this urban site indicates dry deposition accounted for 22% of total inorganic mercury in runoff.
KeywordsDry deposition Mercury Partitioning Stormwater Urban runoff
- American Society for Testing and Materials (1991). Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Section 11, Water and Environment Technology, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
- DeWild, J. F., Olund, S. D., Olson, M. L., & Tate, M. T. (2004). Methods for the preparation and analysis of solids and suspended solids for methylmercury. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations, Book 5, Chapter 7, Section A.Google Scholar
- Dupuis, T., Kreutzberger, W., Kaster, J., & Harris, T. (1985). Effects of highway runoff on receiving waters, V. guidelines for conducting field studies. U.S. Department of Transportation Report No. FHWA/RD-84/066, U.S. Federal Highway Administration.Google Scholar
- Fulkerson, M. (2006). Atmospheric mercury deposition in an urban environment. Dissertation. University of Central Florida.Google Scholar
- Gildemeister, A. E. (2001). Urban atmospheric mercury: The impact of local sources on deposition and ambient concentration in Detroit, Michigan. Dissertation. University of Michigan.Google Scholar
- Kobriger, N. P., Meinholz, T. L., Gupta, M. K., & Agnew, R. W. (1981). Constituents of highway runoff – Volume III, Predictive procedure for determining pollution characteristics in highway runoff. U.S. Department of Transportation Report No. FHWA/RD-81/044, U.S. Federal Highway Administration.Google Scholar
- Lewis, M. E., & Brigham, M. E. (2004). National field manual for the collection of water-quality data. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations, Book 9, Chapter A5, Section 5.6.4.B.Google Scholar
- Mendenhall, W., & Sincich, T. (1995). Statistics for engineering and the sciences. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Mosley, L. M., & Peake, B. M. (2001). Partitioning of metals (Fe, Pb, Cu, Zn) in urban run-off from the Kaikorai Valley, Dunedin, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine Freshwater, 35, 615–624.Google Scholar
- NADP (1997). Quality assurance plan: mercury deposition network. Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, Illinois, http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/lib/qaplans/mdn-qap-1997.pdf/ [accessed 5 March 2005].
- NADP (2003). MDN glass sample train collection and deployment – Trace metal clean sample handling. Illinois State Water Survey, Champaign, Illinois, http://nadp.sws.uiuc.edu/lib/manuals/mdnopman.pdf/ [accessed 9 September 2003].
- Novotny, V., & Olem, H. (1994). Water quality. prevention, identification, and management of diffuse pollution. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
- Olund, S. D., DeWild, J. F., Olson, M. L., & Tate, M. T. (2004). Methods for the preparation and analysis of solids and suspended solids for total mercury. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Investigations, Book 5, Chapter 8, Section A.Google Scholar
- Ramasamy, S. (2002). Development of the traffic simulation model for the UCF campus using paramics. Dissertation. University of Central Florida.Google Scholar
- Schueler, T. (1994). The importance of imperviousness. Watershed Protection Techniques, 1, 100–111.Google Scholar
- Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (1989). American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
- USEPA (1983a). Results of the nationwide urban runoff program. PB 84-185552. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Water Planning Division.Google Scholar
- USEPA (1983b). Methods for the chemical analysis of water and wastes. EPA 600/4-79/020. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development.Google Scholar
- USEPA (1992). NPDES stormwater sampling guidance document. EPA 833-B-92-001. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water.Google Scholar
- USEPA (1996a). Method 1669. Sampling ambient water for trace metals at EPA water quality criteria. EPA 821-R-96-008. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
- USEPA (1996b). Method 1631. Mercury in water by oxidation, purge and trap, and cold vapor atomic fluorescence (CVAFS). EPA 821-R-96-012. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
- USEPA (1997). Method 1630. Methylmercury in water by distillation, aqueous ethylation, purge and trap, and cold vapor atomic fluorescence (CVAFS). Draft method. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
- USEPA (2005). Clean Air Mercury Rule, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., http://www.epa.gov/air/mercuryrule/ [accessed 17 March 2005].
- USGS (2005). Wisconsin District Mercury Laboratory Quality Assurance Manual, U.S. Geological Survey, Middleton, WI, http://infotrek.er.usgs.gov/mercury/ [accessed 12 May 2005].