Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 178, Issue 1–4, pp 169–178 | Cite as

Using Sterols to Detect Pig Slurry Contribution to Soil Organic Matter

  • Emilie Jardé
  • Gérard Gruau
  • Laurence Mansuy-Huault
  • Pascal Peu
  • José Martinez
Article

Abstract

Samples of pig slurry, as well as dairy and poultry manures collected in Brittany (western France) were analysed to test the ability of sterol profiles to provide a fingerprint of pig slurry contribution to soil organic matter. The data show that the 5β-stanol, known as coprostanol, is the most abundant sterol present in pig slurry, whereas this compound occurs only in minor amounts in both poultry and dairy manures. Moreover, systematic variations of (campesterol + sitosterol)/cholesterol (i.e., C28+29/C27) and (coprostanol + epi-coprostanol)/cholesterol (i.e., 5β/C27) ratios allow to discriminate clearly pig slurry from poultry and dairy manures. The robustness of the pig slurry “sterol fingerprint” was tested by analysing the sterol profiles of soil samples from an experimental field that had received a massive pig slurry input between 10 to 14 years ago. The results indicate that the specific sterol profile of pig slurry is conservative once the slurry has been incorporated into the soil. In particular, the diagnostic 5β/C27 ratio proves to be constant with time in soils having received pig slurry application, even 10 years after the end of the application. The “sterol fingerprint” of pig slurry is thus sufficiently distinctive from dairy and poultry manures, and also sufficiently time-resistant, to be of diagnostic value in determining whether a soil sample was once contaminated by pig slurry.

Keywords

organic matter pig slurry biomarker soil sterol soil and water pollution intensive agriculture 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berset, J. D., & Holzer, R. (1995). Organic micropollutants in Swiss agriculture: distribution of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) in soil, liquid manure, sewage sludge and compost samples; a comparative study. International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 59, 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhamidimarry, S. M. R., & Pandey, S. P.(1996). Aerobic thermophilic composting of piggery solid wastes. Water Sciences and Technology, 33, 89–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chantigny, M. H. (2003). Dissolved and water-extractable organic matter in soils: a review on the influence of land use and management practices. Geoderma, 113, 357–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheung, P. C. K. (1998). Plasma and hepathic cholesterol levels and fecal neutral sterol excretion are altered in hamsters fed straw mushroom diet. Journal of Nutrition, 128, 1512–1516.Google Scholar
  5. Cluis, D., & Couture, P.(1987). Problématique environmentale des rejets d’élevages porcins intensifs, Sciences et Techniques de l’Eau, 20, 311–317.Google Scholar
  6. Copenet, M. (1974). L'épandage du lisier de porcherie. Ses conséquences agronomiques. Annales Agronimiques, 25, 403–423.Google Scholar
  7. Eganhouse, R. P. (1997). Molecular Markers and Environmental Organic Geochemistry: An Overview. In R. P. Eganhouse (Ed.), Molecular Markers in Environmental Geochemistry (pp. 1–20). Washington, District of Columbia: American Chemical Society.Google Scholar
  8. Eganhouse, R. P., & Kaplan, I. R. (1982). Extractable Organic Matter in Municipal Wastewater. 2. Hydrocarbons: Molecular Characterization, Environmental Science & Technology, 16, 541–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Faure, P. (1999). Application des techniques de géochimie organique pétrolière à l’étude de problèmes environnementaux: polluants organiques, inertage et stockage des déchets, PhD thesis, Université Henri-Poincaré de Nancy.Google Scholar
  10. Jardé, E., Mansuy, L., & Faure, P. (2003). Characterization of the macromolecular organic content of sewage sludges by thermally assisted hydrolysis and methylation-gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (THM-GC/MS). Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 68, 331–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jardé, E., Mansuy, L., & Faure, P. (2005). Organic markers in the lipidic fraction of sewage sludges. Water Research, 39, pp 1215–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jardé, E., Vilmin, F., Mansuy, L., & Faure, P. (2004). PY-GC/AED and chemometric correlation to characterize sewage sludges of different origins. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis, 71, 553–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kirchmann, H., & Lundvall, A. (1993). Relationship between N immobilization and volatile fatty acids in soil after application of pig and cattle slurry. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 15, 161–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Leeming, R., Ball, A., Asholt, N., & Nichols, P. D. (1996). Using fecal sterols from humans and animals to distinguish fecal pollution in receiving waters. Water Research, 30, 2893–2900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li, Y., Michels, R., Mansuy, L., Elie, M., & Faure, P. (2002). Comparison of pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) with classical solvent extraction (SE) and microwave assisted extraction (MAE)–Application to the investigation of the artificial maturation of Mahakam coal. Fuel, 81, 747–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mansuy, L., Bourezgui, Y., Garnier-Zarli, E., Jardé, E., & Réveillé, V. (2001). Characterization of humic substances in highly polluted river sediments by pyrolysis methylation-gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. Organic Geochemistry, 32, 223–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martinez, J. (1997). Solepur: A soil treatment process for pig slurry with subsequent denitrification of drainage water. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 66, pp 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Martinez, J., & Peu, P. (2000). Nutrient fluxes from a soil treatment process. Soil Use and Management, 16, 100–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martins, J. M., Riottot, M., de Abreu, M. C., Lança, M. J., Viegas-Crespo, A.M., Almeida, J. A, et al. (2004). Dietary Raw Peas (Pisum sativum L.) Reduce plasma total and LDL cholesterol and hepatic esterified cholesterol in intact and ileorectal anastomosed pigs fed cholesterol-rich diets. Journal of Nutrition, 134, 3305–3312.Google Scholar
  20. Marvin, C., Coakley, J., Mayer, T., Brown, M., & Thiessen, L. (2001). Application of fecal sterol ratios in sediments and effluents as source tracers. Water Quality Research Journal of Canada, 36, pp 781–792.Google Scholar
  21. Nicholson, F. A., Chambers, B. J., Williams, J. R., & Unwin, R.J. (1999). Heavy metal content of livestock feeds and animal manures in England and Wales. Bioresource Technology, 70, 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Réveillé, V., Mansuy, L., Jardé, E., & Garnier-Sillam, E. (2003). Characterisation of sewage sludge-derived organic matter: Lipids and humic acids. Organic Geochemistry, 34, 615–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sharlpley, A. N & Smith, S. J. (1995). Nitrogen and phosphorus forms in soils receiving manure. Soil Science, 159, 253–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Takada, H., & Eganhouse, R. P. (1998). Molecular markers of anthropogenic waste. In R. A. Meyers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Environmental Analysis and Remediation, John Wiley, & Sons, pp. 2883–2940.Google Scholar
  25. Tunlid, A., & White, D. C. (1990). Use of lipid biomarkers in environmental samples. In P. Press (Ed.), Analytical Microbiology Methods, Fox Alvin, pp. 259–274.Google Scholar
  26. Walker, R. W., Wun, C. K., & Litsky, W. (1982). Coprostanol as an indicator of fecal pollution. Critical Reviews in Environmental Control, 10, 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Weil, J. H. (1994). Biochimie Générale, Paris, pp. 566Google Scholar
  28. Zsolnay, A., & Görlitz, H. (1994). Water-extractable organic matter in arable soils: Effects of drought and long-term fertilization. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 26, 1257–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emilie Jardé
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gérard Gruau
    • 1
  • Laurence Mansuy-Huault
    • 2
  • Pascal Peu
    • 3
  • José Martinez
    • 3
  1. 1.CAREN, UMR CNRS 6118 Geosciences Rennes, Campus de BeaulieuRennes CedexFrance
  2. 2.G2R, CNRS-Université de NancyVandoeuvre-les-Nancy CedexFrance
  3. 3.CEMAGREF, UR Gestion environnementale et traitement biologique des déchetsRennes CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations