Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 169, Issue 1–4, pp 167–184 | Cite as

Geochemical Distribution of Selected Heavy Metals in Stream Sediments Affected by Tannery Activities

  • Maria Lucia Kolowski Rodrigues
  • Milton Luiz Laquintinie Formoso
Article
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

This study describes the geochemical distribution and potential mobility of selected heavy metals in sediments affected by tanneries established in the Cadeia-Feitoria River basin, South Brazil. Surficial samples were taken at ten sites, in January 2000, during dry season. Metal contents were determined according to their association with main sediment phases by applying a sequential extraction scheme proposed by the ‘Community Bureau of Reference’ of the European Commission. In order to compare the results, total and partial extractions were performed, following analytical methods used by US EPA and US Geological Survey. Metals were analyzed in the silt/clay fraction, using inductively coupled plasma – optical emission spectrometry. The results indicate the following order of metal mobility: Ti (1%) < Al (5%) < Ni (6%) < Fe (10%) < Cu (20%) < Zn (28%) < Cr (49%) < Mn (76%). Manganese was highly mobile along the sampling sites, and mainly bound to exchangeable and reducible phases. Total Ti, Al, Fe, Cu, and Mn exceeded two or three times the average shale metal concentration, but generally reflected background conditions in the basin, where basalt rocks predominate. Ni and Zn were homogeneously distributed along the rivers, with concentrations comparable to the average shale and local concentration levels. Sediments affected by tanneries were enriched with chromium (geoaccumulation index = 2 and 3), preferentially associated to the oxidizable phase. The potential release of this metal and conversion to toxic forms seems closely related to the prevailing redox conditions. The relationship between data obtained from sequential extraction and from partial and total extractions are briefly discussed.

Keywords

heavy metals river sediments chromium speciation tanneries Brazil 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armienta, M. A., Rodríguez, R., Ceniceros, N., Juárez, F. and Cruz, O.: 1996, ‘Distribution, origin and fate of chromium in soils in Guanajuato, Mexico’, Environ. Pollut. 91(3), 391–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ASTM: 1995, ‘Standard test methods for sulfur in the analysis sample of coal and coke using high temperature tube furnace combustion methods’, ASTM-D 4239-94 5(5), 363–375.Google Scholar
  3. Bowen, H. J. M.: 1979, Environmental Chemistry of the Elements, Academic Press, London, 333 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Davidson, C. M., Ferreira, P. C. S. and Ure, A. M.: 1999, ‘Some sources of variability in application of the three-stage sequential extraction procedure recommended by BCR to industrially-contaminated soil’, Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 363, 446–451.Google Scholar
  5. FEPAM/PADCT-FINEP: 2003, Estratégias ecotoxicológicas de avaliação de risco, EcoRISCO Project (technical report), Porto Alegre, Brazil.Google Scholar
  6. Förstner, U.: 1989, ‘Contaminated sediments’, in: S. Bhattacharji, G. M. Fridman, H. J. Neugebauer, et al., Lecture notes in earth sciences, Springer-Verlag, Berlin 21, 1–157.Google Scholar
  7. Gurrieri, J. T.: 1998, ‘Distribution of metals in water and sediment and effects on aquatic biota in the upper Stillwater River basin, Montana’, J. Geochem. Explor. 64, 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. López-Sánchez, J. F., Sahuquillo, A., Fiedler, H. D., Rubio, R., Rauret, G., Muntau, H. and Quevauvillier, Ph.: 1998, ‘CRM 601, a stable material for its extractable content of heavy metals’, Analyst 123, 1675–1677.Google Scholar
  9. Malo, B. A.: 1977, ‘Partial extration of metals from aquatic sediments’, Environ. Sc. Technol. 11 (3), 277–282.Google Scholar
  10. Netherlands. Circular on Target Values and Intervention Values for Soil Remediation. http://www2.minvrom.nl. Accessed: 14.09.2004.
  11. Petersen, W., Willer, E. and Willamowski, C.: 1997, ‘Remobilization of trace elements from polluted anoxic sediments after resuspension in oxic water’, Water Air Soil Pollut. 99, 515–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Quevauviller, Ph., Rauret, G., López-Sánchez, J. F., Rubio, R. Ure, A. and Muntau, H.: 1996, The certification of the EDTA-extractable contents (mass fractions) of Cd, Cr, Ni, Pb and Zn in sediment following a three-step sequential extraction procedure – EUR17554 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, BCR Information, Louxembourg, 59 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Rapin, F., Tessier, A., Campbell, G. C. and Carignan, R.: 1986, ‘Potential artifacts in the determination of metal partitioning in sediments by a sequential extraction procedure’, Environ. Sci. Technol. 20(8), 836–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rauret, G., López-Sánchez, J. F., Sahuquillo, A., Rubio, R., Davidson, C., Ure, A. and Quevauvillier, Ph.: 1999, ‘Improvement of the BCR three step sequential extraction procedure prior to the certification of new sediment and soil reference materials, J. Environ. Monitor. 1, 57–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sahuquillo, A., López-Sánchez, J. F., Rubio, R., Rauret, G. and Hatje, V.: 1995, ‘Sequential extraction of trace metals from sediments. I. Validation of Cr determination in the extracts by AAS’, Fresenius J. Anal. Chem. 351, 197–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Tack, F. M. and Verloo, M. G.: 1995, ‘Chemical speciation and fractionation in soil and sediment heavy metal analysis: a review’, Int. J. Environ. An. Chem. 59, 225–238.Google Scholar
  17. Teixeira, E. C., Rodrigues, M. L. K., Alves, M. F. C. and Barbosa, J. R.: 2003, ‘Study of geochemical distribution of heavy metals in sediments in areas impacted by coal mining’, in J. Locat, R. Galvez-Cloutier, R. C. Chaney and K. Demars (eds.), Contaminated Sediments: Characterization, Evaluation, Mitigation/Restoration, and Management Strategy Performance, ASTM STP 1442, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA, pp. 72–86.Google Scholar
  18. Tessier, A. and Campbell, P. G. C.: 1987, ‘Partitioning of trace metals in sediments: Relationship with bioavailability’, Hydrobiologia 149, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tokalioglu, S., Kartal, S. and Elçi, L.: 2000, ‘Determination of heavy metals and their speciation in lake sediments by flame atomic absorption spectrometry after a four-stage sequential extraction procedure’, Analytica Chimica Acta 413, 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. US EPA: 1995, ‘Method EPA 3051: Microwave assisted acid digestion of sediments, sludges, soils and oils’, in Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods – SW-846. US EPA, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  21. US EPA: 1996, ‘Method 3052: Microwave assisted acid digestion of siliceous and organically based sediments’, in Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods – SW-846. US EPA, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  22. US EPA: 2004a. National Sediment Quality Survey / NSQS. Screening values for chemicals evaluated. http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/cs/vol1/appdx_d.pdf. Accessed: 20.09.2004.
  23. US EPA: 2004b, ‘Preliminary investigation of the extent and effects of sediment contamination in White Lake, MI’, in Great Lakes Contaminated Sediments. http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/sediment/whitelake. Accessed: 17.09.2004.
  24. Walkley-Black, C. A.: 1965, ‘Chemical and Microbiological Properties’, in Methods of soil analysis, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisc., USA 2, 1372–1378 (Agronomy, n. 9).Google Scholar
  25. Wittbrodt, P. R. and Palmer, C. D.: 1996, ‘Effect of temperature, ionic strength, background electrolytes, and Fe(III) on the reduction of hexavalent chromium by soil humic substances’, Environ. Sci. Technol. 30, 2470–2477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zoumis, T., Schmidt, A., Grigorova, L. and Calmano, W.: 2001, ‘Contaminants in sediments: Remobilisation and demobilisation’, Sci. Total Environ. 266, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Lucia Kolowski Rodrigues
    • 1
    • 2
  • Milton Luiz Laquintinie Formoso
    • 2
  1. 1.Fundação Estadual de Proteção Ambiental do Estado do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil
  2. 2.Programa de Pós-Graduação em GeociênciasUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulPorto AlegreBrazil

Personalised recommendations