Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 172, Issue 1–4, pp 57–66 | Cite as

Determination and Mapping Critical Loads of Acidity and Exceedances for Upland Forest Soils in Eastern Canada

  • Rock Ouimet
  • Paul A. Arp
  • Shaun A. Watmough
  • Julian Aherne
  • Ian DeMerchant
Article

Abstract

Critical loads of acidity were estimated for upland forests in Eastern Canada using the steady-state Simple Mass Balance (SMB) Model. A consistent methodology was applied to the entire region, although critical loads were estimated separately for the Atlantic provinces (New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island and Newfoundland), Quebec and Ontario using different data sources. In this project, critical load estimates and steady-state exceedance values did not include the effect of forest fire and forest harvesting, which could have a considerable impact on critical loads in Eastern Canada. The observed soil pH – base saturation relationship for forest soils indicated that the constants used into the calculation of alkalinity leaching should be set to 10 (M/M) for the molar Bc/Al ratio in soil leachate and 109 (mol L−1)2 for the gibbsite dissolution constant. The area-weighted median critical load for each province varied between 519 (Quebec) and 2063 eq ha−1 y−1 (Prince Edward Island), with a median critical load value for Eastern Canada of 559 eq ha−1 y−1. It is estimated that approximately 52% of the mapped area is exceeded in terms of acidity according to the 1994–1998 average total (wet + dry) atmospheric deposition. Greatest exceedances occurred in Ontario and Quebec and in the south of Nova Scotia, due to low critical loads and high loads of acid deposition.

Keywords

acid deposition Bc/Al ratio critical loads Eastern Canada ecological mapping forest soils 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akselsson, C., Ardo, J. and Sverdrup, H.: 2004, ‘Critical loads of acidity for forest soils and relationship to forest decline in the northern Czech Republic’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 98, 363–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arp, P. A., Leger, W., Moayeri, M. H. and Hurley, J. E.: 2001, ‘Methods for mapping Forest Sensitivity to Acid Deposition for northeastern North America’, Ecosystem Health 7, 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arp, P. A., Oja, T. and Marsh, M.: 1996, ‘Calculating critical S and N loads and current exceedances for upland forests in southern Ontario, Canada’, Can. J. For. Res. 26, 696–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bélanger, N., Paré, D. and Yamasaki, S.: 2003, ‘The soil acid-base status of boreal black spruce stands after whole-tree and stem-only harvesting’, Can. J. For. Res. 33, 1874–1879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duchesne, L., Ouimet, R. and Houle, D.: 2002, ‘Basal area growth of Acer saccharum in relation to acid deposition, stand health and soil nutrients’. J. Env. Qual. 31, 1676–1683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dupont, J., Clair, T. A., Couture, S., Estabrook, R., Gagnon, C., Godfrey, P. J., Jeffries, D. S., Kahl, J. S., Khan, H., Nelson, S., Peckenham, J., Pilgrim, W., Stacey, P., Taylor, D. and Van Arsdale, A.: 2005, ‘Critical Loads of Acidity and Water Sensitivity in New England States and Eastern Canadian Provinces’, Environmental Monitoring Assessment (in press).Google Scholar
  7. Environment Canada: 1993, ‘Canadian climate normals 1961–1990, Ontario’, National Climate Data and Information Archive, Meteorological Service of Canada, Environment Canada, Toronto, Ontario.Google Scholar
  8. FPT MEE: 1998, ‘The Canada-wide acid rain strategy for post-2000. Strategy and supporting document’, Federal/Provincial/Territorial Ministers of Energy and Environment, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, 11 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Jeffries, D. S., Ouimet, R., Aherne, J., Arp, P. A., Balland, V., Demerchant, I., Dupont, J., Franklyn, J., Lam, D. C. L., Norouzian, F., Watmough, S. and Wong, I.: 2005, ‘Chapter 8.4. Critical load values and exceedances’, in Meteorological Service of Canada (ed.) 2004 Canadian acid deposition science assessment, Environment Canada, Ottawa, Canada, pp. 350–369.Google Scholar
  10. MacDonald, K. B. and Valentine, K. W. G.: 1992, ‘CanSIS/NSDB. A general description’, Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research, Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, Ottawa., 40 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Moayeri, M. H.: 2001, ‘Mass balance related to sustainability of forest biomass production: concepts and applications’, Ph.D. Thesis. University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N. B., Canada, 291 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Moayeri, M., Meng, F.-R., Arp, P. A. and Foster, N. W.: 2001, ‘Evaluating critical soil acidification loads and exceedances for a deciduous forest at the Turkey Lakes watershed’, Ecosystems 4, 555–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. NEG/ECP Forest Mapping Group: 2001, ‘Protocol for assessment and mapping of forest sensitivity to atmospheric S and N deposition’. New England Governors and Eastern Canadian Premiers, Acid Rain Action Plan, Halifax, Canada.Google Scholar
  14. Oja, T. and Arp, P. A.: 1998, ‘Critical loads of S and N’, in D. Maynard (ed.) Sulfur in the environment, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp. 337–364.Google Scholar
  15. Ouimet, R., Camiré, C. and Furlan, V.: 1996, ‘Effect of base saturation of soil and endomycorrhization on growth and nutrient uptake of sugar maple seedlings’, Can. J. Soil Sci. 76, 109–115.Google Scholar
  16. Ouimet, R., L. Duchesne, D. Houle, P. A. Arp.: 2001, ‘Critical loads of atmospheric S and N deposition and current exceedances for Northern temperate and boreal forests in Quebec’, Water Air Soil Pollut. Focus 1(1/2), 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Périé, C. and Ouimet, R.: 2003, ‘Le réseau d'étude et de surveillance des écosystémes forestiers québécois’, Direction de la recherche forestiére, Ministére des Ressources naturelles, de la Faune et des Parcs, Sainte-Foy (Québec), For. Res. Not. No. 122, 8 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Posch, M., Hettelingh, J.-P. and Slootweg, J.: 2003, ‘Manual for dynamic modelling of soil response to atmospheric deposition’, RIVM Report 259101012/2003, Working Group on Effects of the CLRTAP, Bilthoven, The Netherlands, 71 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Posch, M., de Smet, P. A. M., Hettelingh, J.-P. and Downing, R. J.: 2001, ‘Modelling and mapping of critical thresholds in Europe’, Working Group on Effects of the Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution, RIVM, Bilthoven, Netherlands, 188 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Régniére, J.: 1996, ‘Generalized approach to landscape-wide seasonal forecasting with temperature-driven simulation models’, Environ. Entomol. 25, 869–881.Google Scholar
  21. Ro, C. U. and Vet, R. J.: 2002, ‘Analyzed data fields from the National Atmospheric Chemistry Database (NAtChem) and Analysis Facility’, Air Quality Research Branch, Meteorological Service of Canada, Environment Canada, Toronto, Ontario.Google Scholar
  22. Saucier, J.-P., Bergeron, J.-F., Grondin, P. and Robitaille, A.: 1998, ‘Les régions écologiques du Québec méridional (3e version) : un des éléments du systéme hiérarchique de classification écologique du territoire mis au point par le ministére des Ressources naturelles du Québec’, L'Aubelle (Suppl.) 124, 12 p.Google Scholar
  23. Sverdrup, H., de Vries, W. and Henriksen, A.: 1990, ‘Mapping critical loads: a guidance to the criteria, calculations, data collection and mapping of critical loads’, Miljorapport (Environmental Report) 1990:14., Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers. NORD: 1990:98, 124 p.Google Scholar
  24. Thomsen, M. and Nellemann, C.: 2003, ‘Norway spruce mortality and critical air pollutant loads’, in D. F. Karnosky, K. E. Percy, A. H. Chappelka, C. Simpson and J. Pikkarainen (eds.), Air Pollution, Global Change and forests in the New Milleniu, Elsevier Science BV, New York, NY, pp. 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. UBA: 2004, ‘UBA, 2004, Manual on methodologies and criteria for modelling and mapping critical loads and levels and air pollution effects risks, and trends’, UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution, Berlin, Germany, 202 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Vet, R. J. and Shaw, M.: 2004, ‘1994–1998 average dry deposition velocities calculated using the MSC Air Quality Research Branch dry deposition model (RDM)’, Meteorological Service of Canada, Environment Canada, Toronto, Ontario.Google Scholar
  27. Watmough, S. A. and Dillon, P. J.: 2003, ‘Do critical load models adequately protect forests? A case study in south-central Ontario’, Can. J. For. Res. 33, 1544–1556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rock Ouimet
    • 1
  • Paul A. Arp
    • 2
  • Shaun A. Watmough
    • 3
  • Julian Aherne
    • 3
  • Ian DeMerchant
    • 4
  1. 1.Direction de la recherche forestièreministère des Ressources naturelles et de la Faune du Québec, Complexe scientifiqueSte-FoyCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of Forestry & Environmental ManagementUniversity of New BrunswickFrederictonCanada
  3. 3.Environmental and Resource StudiesTrent UniversityPeterboroughCanada
  4. 4.Canadian Forest Service–Atlantic Forestry CentreFrederictonCanada

Personalised recommendations