Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 173, Issue 1–4, pp 5–20

Aerosol particles in the developing world; a comparison between New Delhi in India and Beijing in China

  • Lauri Laakso
  • Ismo K. Koponen
  • Petteri Mönkkönen
  • Markku Kulmala
  • Veli-Matti Kerminen
  • Birgit Wehner
  • Alfred Wiedensohler
  • Zhijun Wu
  • Min Hu
Article

Abstract

In developing countries, aerosol particles damage the health of hundreds of millions of people. Migration from the country side to megacities increases emissions and exposure to particles. Some countries have started to limit emissions based on particulate mass, but this may increase particle number concentrations. In this study we discuss some earlier measurements carried out in the developing world and compare results from one-week measurement campaigns concerning the particle number size distribution and PM10 mass concentrations in New Delhi, India and Beijing, China. Our results show that submicron particle concentrations are high in both places. The average PM10 concentration was 360 μg/m3 in New Delhi and 120 μg/m3 in Beijing. The corresponding total particle number concentrations in the size range 3–800 nm were 63 000 cm−3 and 35 000 cm−3. Number and mass concentrations and their characteristics showed significantly different behaviour between these two locations, which stresses the importance of long-term simultaneous measurements of both quantities in different types of megacities.

Keywords

air pollution aerosol particles China developing countries India number concentration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aalto, P., Hämeri, K., Becker, E., Weber, R., Salm, J., Mäkelä, J. M., Hoell, C., O'Dowd, C. D., Karlsson, H., Hansson, H.-C., Väkevä, M., Koponen, I., Buzorius, G. and Kulmala, M.: 2001, ‘Physical characterization of aerosol particles during nucleation events’, Tellus B 53, 344–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aalto, P., Hämeri, K., Paatero, P., Kulmala, M., Bellander, T., Berglind, N., Bouso L., Gastano-Vinyals, G., Sunyer, J., Cattani, G., Marconi, A., Cyrys, J., von Klot, S., Peters, A., Zetzsche, K, Lanki, T., Pekkanen, J., Nyberg, F., Sjövall, B. and Forastiere, F.: 2005, ‘Aerosol particle number concentration measurements in five European cities using TSI-3022 Condensation Particle Counter over a three-year period during Health Effects of Air Pollution on Susceptible Subpopulations’, J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 55, 1064–1076.Google Scholar
  3. Baldasano, J. M., Valera, E. and Jiminéz, P.: 2003, ‘Air quality data from large cities’, The Science of the Total Environment 307, 141–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biswas, S. K.: 1996, http://npl-cgc.ernet.in/sasrrc/bangladesh.html.Google Scholar
  5. Brook, J. R., Dann, T. F. and Bonvalot, Y.: 1999, ‘Observations and interpretations from the Canadian Fine Particle Monitoring Program’, J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 49, 35–44.Google Scholar
  6. Chimidza, S. and Moloi, K.: 2000, ‘Identification of sources of aerosol particles in three locations in eastern Botswana’, J. Geophys. Res. 105, 17811–17818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Darlington, T. L., Kahlbaum, D. F., Heuss, J. M. and Wolff, G. T.: 1997, ‘Analysis of PM10 trends in the United States from 1988 through 1995’, J. Air & Waste Manage. Assoc. 47, 1070–1078.Google Scholar
  8. Da-Tong, N., Liang-Xi, Z. and Yong-Seung, C.: 1996, ‘Aerosol size distribution and elemental composition in urban areas of Northern China’, Atmospheric Environment 30, 2355–2362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Draxler, R. R. and Rolph, G. D.: 2003, ‘HYSPLIT (HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory), Model access via NOAA ARL READY Website’ (http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ ready/hysplit4.html), NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD.Google Scholar
  10. Dunn, M. J., Jimenez, J.-L., Baumgardner, D., Castro, T., McMurry, P. H. and Smith, J. N.: 2004, ‘Measurements of Mexico City nanoparticle size distributions: Observations of new particle formation and growth’, Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, doi: 10.1029/2004GL019483.Google Scholar
  11. Fenger, J.: 1999, ‘Urban Air Quality’, Atmospheric Environment 33, 4877–4900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harris, S. and Maricq, M.: 2001, ‘Signature size distributions for diesel and gasoline engine exhaust particulate matter’, Journal of Aerosol Science 32, 749–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harrison, R. M., Jones, M. and Collins, G.: 1999, ‘Measurements of the physical properties of particles in the urban atmosphere’, Atmospheric Environment 33, 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harrison, R. M. and Jones, A. M.: 2005, ‘Multisite study of particle number concentrations in urban air’, Environmental Science and Technology 39, 6063–6070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. He, K., Yang, F., Ma, Y., Cadle, S. H., Chan, T., Mulawa, P. A. and Yan, Y.: 2002, ‘Trends in PM2.5 concentration and its relationship with PM10 and TSP in China’, In Proceedings of the sixth international aerosol conference, 2002, Taipei, Taiwan, p. 257Google Scholar
  16. Houthuijs, D., Breugelmansa, O., Hoek, G., Vaskövi, E., Miháliková, E., Pastuszka, J. S., Jirik, V., Sachelarescug, S., Lolova, D., Meliefste, K., Uzunova, E., Marinescug, C., Volf, J., de Leeuw, F., de Wiel, H., Fletcher, T., Lebret, E. and Brunekreef, B.: 2001, ‘PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations in Central and Eastern Europe: Results from the Cesar study’, Atmospheric Environment 35, 2757–2771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jayaratne, E. R. and Verma, T. S.: 2001, ‘The impact of biomass burning on the environmental aerosol concentration in Gaborone, Botswana’, Atmospheric Environment 35, 1821–1828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kulmala, M., Dal Maso, M., Mäkelä, J. M., Pirjola, L., Väkevä, M., Aalto, P. P., Miikkulainen, P., Hämeri, K. and O'Dowd, C. D.: 2001, ‘On the formation, growth and composition of nucleation mode particles’, Tellus 53B, 479–490.Google Scholar
  19. Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., Mönkkönen, P., Koponen, I. K., Dal Maso, M., Aalto, P. P., Lehtinen, K. E. J. and Kerminen, V.-M.: 2005, ‘On the growth of nucleation mode particles: Source rates of condensable vapor in polluted and clean environments’, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 5, 409–416.Google Scholar
  20. Laakso, L., Hussein, T., Aarnio, P., Komppula, M., Hiltunen, V., Viisanen, Y. and Kulmala, M.: 2003, ‘Diurnal and annual characteristics of particle mass and number concentrations in urban, rural and Arctic environments in Finland’, Atmospheric Environment 37, 2629–2641.Google Scholar
  21. Laakso, L., Olin, M., Hämeri, K., Kulmala, M., Hannula, J., Galkin, T. and Väkeväinen, K.: 2004, ‘Deposition of aerosol particles in portable electronic devices’, Nokia internal report, pp. 70.Google Scholar
  22. Mage, D., Ozolins, G, Peterson, P., Webstar, A., Orthofer, R., Vandeweerd, V. and Gwynne, M.: 1996, ‘Urban air pollution in megacities of the world’, Atmospheric Environment 30, 681–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mitra, A. P. and Sharma, C.: 2002, ‘Indian aerosols: Present status’, Chemosphere 49, 1175–1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Molina, M. J. and Molina, L. T.: 2004, ‘Megacities and atmospheric pollution’, J. Air & Waste Management association 54, 644–680.Google Scholar
  25. Moloi, K., Chimidza, S., Lindgren, E. S., Viksna, A. and Standzenieks, P. 2002: ‘Black carbon, mass and elemental measurements of airborne particles in the village of Serowe, Botswana’. Atmospheric Environment 36, 2447–2457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Morawska, L., Johnson, G., Ristovski, Z. D. and Agranovski, V.: 1999, ‘Relation between particle mass and number for submicrometer airborne particles’, Atmospheric Environment 33, 1983–1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mori, I., Nishikawa, M., Quan, H. and Morita, M.: 2002, ‘Estimation of the concentration and chemical composition of kosa aerosols at their origin’, Atmospheric Environment 36, 4569–4575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mönkkönen, P., Uma, R., Srinivasan, D., Koponen, I. K., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Suresh, R., Sharma, V. P. and Kulmala, M.: 2004a, ‘Relationship and variations of aerosol number and PM10 mass concentrations in a highly polluted urban environment – New Delhi, India.’, Atmospheric Environment 36, 425–433.Google Scholar
  29. Mönkkönen, P., Koponen, I. K., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Uma, R., Srinivasan, D., Hämeri, K. and Kulmala, M.: 2004b, ‘Death of nucleation and Aitken mode particles: Observations at extreme atmospheric conditions and their theoretical explanation’, J. Aerosol Science 35, 781–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mönkkönen, P., Koponen, I. K., Lehtinen, K. E. J, Hämeri, K., Uma, R. and Kulmala, M.: 2005a, ‘Measurements in a highly polluted Asian mega city: Observations of aerosol number size distribution, modal parameters and nucleation events’, Atmos. Chem. Phys. 5, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mönkkönen, P., Pai, P., Maynard, A., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Hämeri, K., Rechkemmer, P., Ramachandran, G., Prasad, B. and Kulmala, M.: 2005b, ‘Fine particle number and mass concentration measurements in urban Indian households’, Science of The Total Environment 347, 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parekh, P. P., Khwaja, H. A., Khan, A. R., Naqvi, R. R., Malik, A., Shah, S. A., Khan, K. and Hussain, G.: 2001, ‘Ambient air quality of two metropolitan cities of Pakistan and its health implications’, Atmospheric Environment 35, 5971–5978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Quant, F. R., Caldow, R., Sem, G. J. and Addison, T. J.: 1992, ‘Performance of Condensation Particle Counters with Three Continuous Flow Designs’, J. Aerosol Science 23, 405–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scholorling, M.: 2000: Sixth International Conference on Urban Transport and the Environment for the 21st Century. July 26–28, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  35. Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: 1998, ‘Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change’, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  36. Singh, R. P., Dey, S., Tripathi, S. N. and Tare, V.: 2004, ‘Variability of aerosol parameters over Kanpur, Northern India’, Journal of Geophysical Research 109, doi:10.1029/2004JD004966.Google Scholar
  37. Stolzenburg, M. R. and McMurry, P. H.: 1991, ‘An ultrafine aerosol condensation nucleus counter’, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 14, 48–65.Google Scholar
  38. Trier, A.: 1997, ‘Submicron particles in an urban atmosphere: A study of optical size distributions – I’, Atmospheric Environment 31, 909–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. UNEP and C4: 2002, ‘Asian Brown Cloud: Climate and Other Environmental Impacts’, UNEP, Nairobi, http://www.rrcap.unep.org/abc/impactstudy/Executive%20Summary.pdf.Google Scholar
  40. Vega, E., Reyes, E., Sánchez, G., Ortiz, E., Ruiz, M., Chow, J., Watson, J. and Edgerton, S.: 2002, ‘Basic statistics of PM2.5 and PM10 in the atmosphere of Mexico City’, The Science of Total Environment 287, 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Venkataraman, C., Thomas, S. and Kulkarni, P.: 1999, ‘Size distributions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons – gas/particle partitioning to urban aerosols’, J. Aerosol Science 30, 759–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Venkataraman, C., Reddy, C. K., Josson, S. and Reddy, M. S.: 2002, ‘Aerosol size and chemical characteristics at Mumbai, India, during the INDOEX-IFP (1999)’, Atmospheric Environment 36, 1979–1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Venkataraman, C., Habib, G., Eiguren-Fernandez, A., Miguel, A. H. and Friedlander, S. K.: 2005, ‘Residential biofuels in South Asia: Carbonaceous aerosol emissions and climate impacts’, Science 307, 1454–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wehner, B., Wiedensohler, A., Tuch, T. M., Wu, Z. J., Hu, M., Slanina, J. and Kiang, C.S.: 2004, ‘Variability of the aerosol number size distribution in Beijing, China: New particle formation, dust storms, and high continental background.’ Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, doi:10.1029/ 2004GL021596.Google Scholar
  45. Winklmayr, W., Reischl, G. P., Lindner, A. O. and Berner, A.: 1991, ‘A new electromobility spectrometer for the measurement of aerosol size distributions in the size range from 1 to 1000 nm’, J. Aerosol Science 22, 289–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. WHO: 1976, WHO health standards 1976.Google Scholar
  47. Woo, K. S., Chen, D. R., Pui, D. Y. H. and McMurry P. H.: 2001, ‘Measurements of Atlanta aerosol size distributions: Observations of ultrafine particle events’, Aerosol Sci. Technol. 34, 75–87.Google Scholar
  48. YTV: 2002, ‘Ilmanlaatu pääkaupunkiseudulla vuonna 2001’, Pääkaupunkiseudun julkaisusarja C 2002:17.Google Scholar
  49. Zhang, X. Y., Cao, J. J., Li, L. M., Arimoto, R., Cheng, Y., Huebert, B. and Wang, D.: 2002, ‘Characterization of Atmospheric Aerosol over XiAn in the South Margin of the Loess Plateau, China’, Atmospheric Environment 36, 4189–4199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lauri Laakso
    • 1
  • Ismo K. Koponen
    • 1
  • Petteri Mönkkönen
    • 1
  • Markku Kulmala
    • 1
  • Veli-Matti Kerminen
    • 2
  • Birgit Wehner
    • 3
  • Alfred Wiedensohler
    • 3
  • Zhijun Wu
    • 4
  • Min Hu
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Physical SciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Finnish Meteorological InstituteLeipzigGermany
  3. 3.Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric ResearchLeipzigGermany
  4. 4.State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution ControlCollege of Environmental Sciences, Peking UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations