Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 176, Issue 1–4, pp 5–19 | Cite as

Effective Nutrient Sources for Plant Growth on Bauxite Residue

I. Comparing Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers
Article

Abstract

We conducted a field experiment to evaluate alternatives to poultry manure, the normal fertilizer used for growing dust control crops and native vegetation on bauxite residue sand. We compared plant growth, nutrient uptake and residue properties after applications of poultry manure, compost, composted poultry manure and inorganic fertilizer. The compost used was prepared from green waste treated with piggery waste. Plant growth was poor under the compost and composted poultry manure treatments, which produced 0.69 and 1.11 t ha− 1 of above ground biomass, respectively. This compared with 2.43 t ha− 1 from the inorganic fertilizer treatment which had a similar biomass to the poultry manure treatment (3.00 t ha− 1). All treatments, including poultry manure, had low foliar concentrations of some nutrients, with low levels of N, P, K, Mg, Cu and Zn found in most treatments.

Of the two treatments which gave effective dust control (inorganic fertilizer and poultry manure) the most economical was inorganic fertilizer which cost A$1227 ha− 1. The high application rate of the poultry manure made it the most expensive fertilizer treatment at a cost of A$1650 ha− 1. There appeared to be no long-term benefit of using organic amendments, as organic fertilizers did not improve residue conditions (organic matter content, pH, electrical conductivity, activity of Na+ ions) compared with the inorganic fertilizer. It was concluded that inorganic fertilizer could provide a suitable, cost-effective alternative to poultry manure for growth of dust control crops, with further research required to address low levels of some nutrients.

Keywords

bauxite residue dust control fertilizers organic fertilizers plant nutrients rehabilitation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Association of Official Analytical Chemists: 1990, in K. Helrich (ed), Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of the AOAC, Arlington, Virginia, USA, pp. 1298.Google Scholar
  2. Barrow, N. J.: 1982, ‘Possibility of using caustic residue from bauxite for improving the chemical and physical properties of sandy soil’, Aust. J. Agric. Res. 33, 275–285.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, L. C.: 1981, ‘A systematic approach to the assessment of fertilizer requirements for the rehabilitation of mine wastes’, in Australian Mining Industry Council (AMIC) Environmental Workshop Papers, Canberra, September 1981, pp. 163–175.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, R. W., Fletcher, N., Samaweera, M. K. and Hammond, I.: 1997, ‘The use of inorganic fertilizer in place of organic amendments for rehabilitation of gold and bauxite ore refining residue’, Murdoch University Report for Alcoa of Australia and Worsley Alumina, p. 104.Google Scholar
  5. Bernstein, L. 1964, ‘Effects of salinity on mineral composition and growth of plants’, in C. Bould, P. Prevot and I. R. Magness (eds), Plant Analysis and Fertilizer Problems IV, Am. Soc. Hort. W.F. Humphrey Press, Geneva, pp. 25–45.Google Scholar
  6. Bernstein, L., Francois, L. E. and Clark, R. A.: 1974, ‘Interactive effects of salinity and fertility on yields of grains and vegetables’, Agron. J. 66, 412–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Best, E. K.: 1976, ‘An automated method for determining nitrate-nitrogen in soil extracts’, Qld. J. Agric. Anim. Sci. 33, 161–166.Google Scholar
  8. Bucher, M. A.: 1985, ‘The effects of gypsum and sewage sludge on plant growth and nutrition on alkaline, saline, fine textured bauxite residues’, M.Phil Thesis, Duke University, Durham, NC, pp.~100.Google Scholar
  9. Blair, G. J., Chinoim, N., Lefroy, R. D. B., Anderson, G. C. and Crocker, G. J.: 1991, ‘A soil sulphur test for pastures and crops’, Aust. J. Soil Res. 29, 619–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapman, H. D.: 1966, ‘Diagnostic Criteria for plants and soils’, University of California, pp. 749.Google Scholar
  11. Eastham, J. and Morald, T.: 2006, ‘Effective nutrient sources for plant growth on bauxite residue: II. Evaluating the response to inorganic fertilizers’, Water, Air, and Soil Pollution (DOI: 10.1007/s11270-005-9055-8).Google Scholar
  12. Fuller, R. D.: 1983, ‘Effects of aluminate ion toxicity on plant growth and mineral nutrition in bauxite residue reclamation' Ph.D thesis, Duke University, Durham, NC., p. 198.Google Scholar
  13. Hossner, L. R., Loeppert, R. H., Woodlard, H. J., Moore, T. J. and Thompson, T. L.: 1986, ‘Reclamation and vegetation of Bauxite residue’, Alcoa Report No. 3, Soil and Crop Science Department, Texas A {&} M University, p. 128.Google Scholar
  14. Jasper, D. A., Lockley, I., White, A. and Ward, S. C.: 2000, ‘Building soil fertility in rehabilitated bauxite residue’, in Soils 2000 – Making our science more useable, July 2000, Australian Society of Soil Science Inc (W. A. Branch), pp. 57–62.Google Scholar
  15. Lockley, I. R.: 1999, ‘Comparison of compost and poultry manure for the establishment of dust control crops on Alcoa's bauxite residue’, in Compost in Horticulture Seminar, 31 July 1999, University of Western Australia.Google Scholar
  16. McQuaker, N. R., Brown, D. F. and Kluckner, P. D.: 1979, ‘Digestion of environmental materials for analysis by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry’, Anal. Chem. 51, 1082–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meecham, J. R. and Bell, L. C.: 1977, ‘Revegetation of alumina refinery wastes: I. Properties and amelioration of the materials’, Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb. 17, 679–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rayment, G. E. and Higginson, F. R.:1992, ‘Soil pH’, in Australian Laboratory Handbook of Soil and Water Chemical Methods, Inkata Press, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  19. Reuter, D. J. and Robinson, J. B.: 1997, Plant analysis. An interpretation manual, 2nd edn. CSIRO Australia.Google Scholar
  20. Searle, P. L.: 1984, ‘The Berthelot or indophenol reaction and its use in the analytical chemistry of nitrogen: A review’, Analyst 109, 549–568.CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  21. Spain, A. V., Isbell, R. F. and Probert, M. E.: 1983, ‘Soil Organic matter’, in Soils: An Australian viewpoint, CSIRO/Academic Press, Melbourne/London, UK, 551–563.Google Scholar
  22. Walpole, R. E.: 1974, Introduction to statistics, McMillan Publishing Co., Inc, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Western Australia Health Department: 2001, ‘Health (poultry manure) regulations 2001’, Gazette 94, 4577–4580.Google Scholar
  24. Wild, A.:1988, ‘Plant nutrients in soil: Phosphate’, in A. Wild (ed), Russell's Soil Conditions and Plant Growth, Longman group, UK, pp. 696–742.Google Scholar
  25. Wong, J. W. C.: 1990, ‘Sodium release characteristics and revegetation of fine bauxite refining residue (red mud)’, Ph.D thesis, Murdoch University, Australia, pp. 443.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Alcoa World Alumina AustraliaPerthWestern Australia
  2. 2.MGA ConsultingRossmoyneWestern Australia
  3. 3.CSIROWembleyWestern Australia

Personalised recommendations