Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 164, Issue 1–4, pp 401–407 | Cite as

Determination of Natural and Artificial Radionuclide Levels in Soils of Western and Southern Coastal Area of Turkey

Article

Abstract

Soil samples were collected from western and southern region of Turkey in 1995 from 17 sampling stations of different depths. Natural and artificial radionuclide activity levels of soil samples of the western and southern sea in Turkey were previously reported about nine years after the Chernobyl accident. The aim of the study was to collect data for following up of the earlier study and to present result for distributions of radionuclides in soil samples of the western and southern regions of Turkey. 226Ra is in the range 19–276 Bq kg−1, 7–173 Bq kg−1 for 238U, 8–244 Bq kg−1 for 232Th, 86–1162 Bq kg−1 (dry wt.) for 40K and 137Cs activity result varies between 1.8–82 Bq kg−1 (dry wt.).

Keywords

radionuclides gamma isotopic analyses Cs-137 soil samples 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akçay, H. and Ardisson, A.: 1988, ‘Radioactive pollution of Turkish biota one year after Chernobyl accident’, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. Letter 128(4), 273–281.Google Scholar
  2. Cremers, A., Elsen, A., De Pieter, P. and Maes, A.: 1988, ‘Quantitative analysis of radiocesium retention in soil’, Nature 335, 247–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Köse, A. and Varinlioğlu, A.: 1993, ‘Determination of contamination in soil from Chernobyl of Thrace region’, VI National Congress on Nuclear Science and Technology. Bursa Turkey 14–17 September. (in Turkish).Google Scholar
  4. Oruç, N.: 1989, ‘Distribution of the 134Cs and 137Cs in soil of the Thrace region after Chernobyl accident’, Symposium on Radioactive Waste, Environment and Health. University of Bosphoros 3–5 May İstanbul (in Turkish).Google Scholar
  5. Schimmack, W., Bunzl, K. and Zelles, L.: 1989, ‘Initial rates of midration of radionuclides from Chernobyl fallout in undisterbed soils’, Geoderma 44, 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Topçuoğlu, S., Karahan, G., Güngör, N., Kinodot;rbaşoğlu, Ç.: in press(a), A study on natural and artificial radioactivity in Emendere thermal spring area in western Anatolia. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem.Google Scholar
  7. Topçuoğlu, S., Türer, A., Güngör, N., Kırbaşoğlu, Ç.: in press(b), Monitoring of anthropogenic and natural radionuclides and gamma absorbed dose rates in eastern Anatolia. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem.Google Scholar
  8. Varinlioğlu, A. and Köse, A.: 1996, ‘Deposition of the radiocesium in soil at Black Sea coastal area in Turkey after Chernobyl accident. International Conference One Decade After Chernobyl Vienna, Austria 8–12 April.Google Scholar
  9. Varinlioğlu, A., Akyüz, T. and Köse, A.: 1988, ‘The radioactivity measurement of Turkish lignites’, J. Environ. Radioactivity 41(3), 381–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Zodrow, E. L.: 1990, ‘Uranium variation in eastern coal: Sidney coalfield, Nova Scotia, Canada’, Energy Sources 12, 239–250.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Çekmece Nuclear Research and Training Centerİstanbul

Personalised recommendations