Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

A Facility to Investigate Effects of Elevated Soil Gas Concentration on Vegetation

  • 120 Accesses

  • 9 Citations


A facility has been developed at the University of Nottingham at which natural gas can be injected into soil to investigate the effects on the soil ecology and on the growth and development of plants. The facility involves 18 plots, 12 of which are equipped with a regulated and metered gas supply. The gas is released from a diffusive point source 1 m below the centre of each plot. Permanent pasture grass, wheat and bean were gassed from October 2002 until July 2003 at a target flow rate of 100 L h−1. From May 2003 until July 2003 gas was injected into additional plots of each species to determine the effects of a new leak on a fully established crop. Spatial and temporal variability of soil gas concentrations were determined by two complementary methods. First, by daily extraction of soil gas samples from permanently buried sample pipes that come to diffusive equilibrium with the adjacent soil gas concentration. Second, by intermittent extraction of soil gas samples from bar holes inserted on a 50-cm grid. Contour plots of spatial variation were then constructed from the bar hole data.

Methane (CH4) concentrations near the centres of the plots were variable. They could reach values of up to 80% gas, but decreased rapidly away from the area of peak concentration. No relationship was found between gas flow rate or soil gas concentration and atmospheric pressure or other meteorological parameters. Soil structure affected gas dispersion, and an inverse relationship was found between CH4 and O2 concentrations.

The grass showed visible symptoms within 44 days, whereas wheat and bean developed symptoms after four months. These symptoms included a circle of chlorosis in grass and poor development and leaf chlorosis for the wheat and bean. When the same species were gassed from mid-May; the wheat and bean showed no visible symptoms but the late-gassed grass also developed a further circle of yellowing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Adams, R. J. and Ellis, R. J.: 1960, ‘Some physical and chemical changes in the soil bought about by saturation with natural gas’, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 24, 41–44.

  2. Adamse, A. D., Hoeks, J., DeBont, J. A. M. and van Hessel, J. F.: 1972, ‘Microbial activities in soil near natural gas leaks’, Archive Mikrobiology 83, 32–51.

  3. Altshuler, K. and Burmaster, D.: 1997, ‘Soil gas modelling: The need for new techniques and better information’, J. Soil Contam. 6, 3–8.

  4. Arif, M. and Verstraete, W.: 1995, ‘Methane dosage to soil and its effect on plant growth’, World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 11, 529–535.

  5. Arthur, J., Leone, I. and Flower, F.: 1985, ‘The response of tomato plants to simulated landfill gas mixtures’, J. Environ. Sci. Health A20, 913–925.

  6. Baggott, S. L., Davidson, I., Dore, C., Goodwin, J., Milne, R., Murrells, T. P., Rose, M., Watterson, J. D. and Underwood, B.: 2003, ‘UK Greenhouse Gas Inventory, 1990 to 2001 (Annual Report for submission under the Framework Convention on Climate Change).’

  7. Boltze, U. and De Freitas, H.: 1997, ‘Monitoring gas emissions from landfill sites’, Waste Manage. Res. 15, 463–476.

  8. Bruinsma, J.: 1963, ‘The quantitative analysis of chlorophylls a and b in plant extracts’, Photochem. Photobiol. 2, 241–249.

  9. Carter, G. A., Cibula, W. G. and Miller, R. L.: 1996, ‘Narrow band reflectance imagery compared with thermal imagery for early detection of plant stress’, J. Plant Physiol. 148, 515–522.

  10. Christophersen, M. and Kjeldsen, P.: 2001, ‘Lateral gas transport in soil adjacent to an old landfill: Factors governing gas migration’, Waste Manage. Res. 19, 144–159.

  11. Gilman, E., Leone, I. and Flower, F.: 1982, ‘Influence of soil gas contamination on tree root health’, Plant Soil 65, 3–10.

  12. Godwin, R., Abouguendia, Z. and Thorpe, J.: 1990, ‘Response of soils and plants to natural gas migration from two wells in the Lloydminster area’, Saskatchewan Research Council, pp. 85.

  13. Gustafson, F.: 1944, ‘Is natural gas injurious to flowering plants’, Plant Physiol. 19, 551–558.

  14. Gustafson, F.: 1950, ‘Is the American Elm (Ulmus Americana) injured by natural gas’, Plant Physiol. 25, 433–440.

  15. Hanson, R. and Hanson, T.: 1996, ‘Methanotrophic bacteria’, Microbiol. Rev. 60, 439–471.

  16. Hoeks, J.: 1972a, ‘Changes in the composition of soil air near leaks in natural gas mains’, Soil Sci. 113, 46–54.

  17. Hoeks, J.: 1972b, ‘Effect of leaking natural gas on soil and vegetation in urban areas’, Agric. Res. Rep. 778.

  18. Hutsch, B.: 2001, ‘Methane oxidation in non-flooded soils as affected by crop production - invited paper’, Eur. J. Agron. 14, 237–260.

  19. IPCC: 1992, ‘Climate change: The IPCC 1990 and 1992 Assessments’. World Meteorlogical Organisation/Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

  20. Jones, H. and Nedwell, D.: 1993, ‘Methane emission and methane oxidation in land-fill cover soil’, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 102, 185–195.

  21. Meissner, B., Wendlandt, K. and Stottmeister, U.: 1999, ‘Death of trees caused by leakage of natural gas’, Meedelingen faculteit landbouwkundige en toegepaste biologische 64, 179–182.

  22. Peebles, M. W. H.: 1992, Natural Gas Fundamentals, Shell International Gas Ltd.

  23. Pysek, P. and Pysek, A.: 1989, ‘Changes in vegetation caused by experimental leakage of natural gas’, Weed Res. 29.

  24. Rock, B. N., Hoshizaki, T. and Miller, J. R.: 1988, ‘Comparison of in situ and airborne spectral measurements of the blue shift associated with forest decline’, Remote Sens. Environ. 24, 109–127.

  25. Scholenberger, C.: 1930, ‘Effect of leaking natural gas upon the soil’, Soil Sci. 29, 260–266.

  26. Smith, K. L.: 2002, ‘Remote sensing of leaf responses to leaking underground natural gas’, PhD, University of Nottingham, pp. 225.

  27. Smith, K. L., Steven, M. D. and Colls, J. J. in press, ‘Use of hyperspectral derivative ratios in the red-edge region to identify plant stress responses to gas leaks’, Remote Sens. Environ. 92, 207–217.

  28. Trought, M. C. T. and Drew, M. C.: 1980, ‘The development of waterlogging damage in wheat seedlings (Tritium Aestivum L.) I. Shoot and root growth in relation to changes in the concentrations of dissolved gases and solutes in the soil solution’, Plant Soil 54, 77–94.

  29. Whalen, S., Reeburgh, W. and Sandbeck, K.: 1990, ‘Rapid methane oxidation in a landfill cover soil’, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56, 3405–3411.

  30. Wit, D.: 1978, ‘Morphology and function of root and shoot growth of crop plants under oxygen deficiency’, in D. Hook and R. Crawford (eds.), Plant Life in Anaerobic Environments., Ann Arbor Science.

  31. Young, A.: 1992, ‘The effects of fluctuations in atmospheric pressure on landfill gas migration and composition’, Waste Manage. Res. 64, 601–616.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to K. L. Smith.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, K.L., COLLS, J.J. & Steven, M.D. A Facility to Investigate Effects of Elevated Soil Gas Concentration on Vegetation. Water Air Soil Pollut 161, 75–96 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-005-2833-x

Download citation


  • methane
  • natural gas
  • oxidation
  • remote sensing
  • vegetation stress