Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

An Inverse Modeling Approach to Calibrate Parameters for a Drainage Model with Two Optimization Algorithms on Homogeneous/Heterogeneous Soil

  • 180 Accesses

Abstract

Due to the time and spatial limitations of subsurface drainage pilots, simulation models have been extensively applied for evaluating these systems. Since the accuracy of simulation models depends enormously on the accuracy of model parameters, this study aims to develop an inverse modeling approach for estimating most influential soil hydraulic and solute transport parameters in a subsurface drainage system in an arid and semi-arid region. The SWAP model in conjunction with a genetic algorithm and PEST optimization tool was used to find optimum parameters by minimizing the differences between observed and simulated values of drainage discharge, watertable depth, and drainage salinity. Results revealed that the best simulation of drainage outputs was obtained by parameters which were estimated minimizing an objective function that included all three datasets via a genetic algorithm. Although assuming the soil as a homogeneous and heterogeneous medium had quite similar results from objective functions with one or two datasets, homogeneous assumption worked better in the objective function with three datasets. The inverse modelling approach with GA resulted in a better performance as compared to the PEST optimization tool, particularly in objective functions with two or three datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Carroll DL (1996) Chemical laser modeling with genetic algorithms. Am Inst Aeronaut Astronaut J 34(2):338–346

  2. Dane JH, Hruska S (1983) In-situ determination of soil hydraulic properties during drainage. Soil Sci Soc Am J 47(4):619–624

  3. Dane JH, Topp GC (2002) Part 4. Physical Methods. Methods of Soil Analysis. Soil Science Society of America, Wisconsin

  4. Doherty J (2005) PEST: model independent parameter estimation, fifth edition of user manual. Watermark Numerical Computing, Brisbane

  5. Droogers P, Immerzeel WW, Lorite IJ (2010) Estimating actual irrigation application by remotely sensed evapotranspiration observations. Agric Water Manag 97(9):1351–1359

  6. Durner W, Jansen U, Iden SC (2008) Effective hydraulic properties of layered soils at the lysimeter scale determined by inverse modelling. Eur J Soil Sci 59(1):114–124

  7. Ebrahimian H, Parsinejad M, Liaghat A, Akram M (2011) Field research on the performance of a rice husk envelope in a subsurface drainage system (case study Behshahr Iran). Irrig Drain 60(2):216–228

  8. Ebrahimian H, Liaghat A, Parsinejad M, Playán E, Abbasi F, Navabian M, Lattore B (2013) Optimum design of alternate and conventional furrow fertigation to minimize nitrate loss. J Irrig Drain Eng 139(11):911–921

  9. El-Sadek A, Feyen J, Berlamont J (2001) Comparison of models for computing drainage discharge. J Irrig Drain Eng 127(6):363–369

  10. Farmaha BS (2014) Evaluating Animo model for predicting nitrogen leaching in rice and wheat. Arid Land Res Manag 28(1):25–35

  11. Hopmans JW, Šimunek J, Bristow KL (2002) Indirect estimation of soil thermal properties and water flux using heat pulse probe measurements: geometry and dispersion effects. Water Resour Res 38(1):71–714

  12. Ines AV, Droogers P (2002) Inverse modelling in estimating soil hydraulic functions: a genetic algorithm approach. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 6(1):49–66

  13. Ines AV, Mohanty BP (2008) Near-surface soil moisture assimilation for quantifying effective soil hydraulic properties using genetic algorithm: 1. Conceptual modeling. Water Resour Res 44(6)

  14. Irmak A, Kamble B (2009) Evapotranspiration data assimilation with genetic algorithms and SWAP model for on-demand irrigation. Irrig Sci 28(1):101–112

  15. Jhorar RK, Van Dam JC, Bastiaanssen WGM, Feddes RA (2004) Calibration of effective soil hydraulic parameters of heterogeneous soil profiles. J Hydrol 285(1):233–247

  16. Kroes JG, Van Dam JC, Groenendijk P, Hendriks RFA, Jacobs CMJ (2008) SWAP version 3.2. Theory description and user manual. Netherlands: Alterra

  17. Lai J, Ren L (2016) Estimation of effective hydraulic parameters in heterogeneous soils at field scale. Geoderma 264:28–41

  18. Mertens J, Kahl G, Gottesbüren B, Vanderborght J (2009) Inverse modeling of pesticide leaching in lysimeters: local versus global and sequential single-objective versus multiobjective approaches. Vadose Zone J 8(3):793–804

  19. Mishra S, Parker JC (1989) Parameter estimation for coupled unsaturated flow and transport. Water Resour Res 25(3):385–396

  20. Negm L, Youssef M, Skaggs R, Chescheir G, Kladivko E (2014) DRAINMOD-DSSAT simulation of the hydrology, nitrogen dynamics, and plant growth of a drained corn field in Indiana. J Irrig Drain Eng 140(8):04014026

  21. Noory H, Van Der Zee SEATM, Liaghat AM, Parsinejad M, Van Dam JC (2011) Distributed agro-hydrological modeling with SWAP to improve water and salt management of the Voshmgir irrigation and drainage network in northern Iran. Agric Water Manag 98(6):1062–1070

  22. Praveen K, Alameda J, Bajcsy P, Folk M, Markus M (2006) Hydro informatics data integrative approaches in computation, analysis, and modeling. Florida: CRC Press

  23. Qureshi AS, Ahmad W, Ahmad AFA (2013) Optimum groundwater table depth and irrigation schedules for controlling soil salinity in Central Iraq. Irrig Drain 62(4):414–424

  24. Reshma T, Reddy KV, Pratap D, Ahmedi M, Agilan V (2015) Optimization of calibration parameters for an event based watershed model using a genetic algorithm. Water Resour Manag 29(13):4589–4606

  25. Ritter A, Hupet F, Muñoz-Carpena R, Lambot S, Vanclooster M (2003) Using inverse methods for estimating soil hydraulic properties from field data as an alternative to direct methods. Agric Water Manag 59(2):77–96

  26. Ritter A, Muñoz-Carpena R, Regalado CM, Vanclooster M, Lambot S (2004) Analysis of alternative measurement strategies for the inverse optimization of the hydraulic properties of a volcanic soil. J Hydrol 295(1):124–139

  27. Ritzema HP (1994) Drainage principles and applications. Netherlands: International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement (ILRI)

  28. Sarwar A, Bastiaanssen WGM, Boers TM, Van Dam JC (2000) Devaluating drainage design parameters for the fourth drainage project, Pakistan by using SWAP model: part I–calibration. Irrig Drain Sys Eng 14 (4):257–280

  29. Sedaghatdoost A, Ebrahimian H (2015) Calibration of infiltration, roughness and longitudinal dispersivity coefficients in furrow fertigation using inverse modelling with a genetic algorithm. Biosyst Eng 136:129–139

  30. Sedaghatdoost A, Ebrahimian H, Liaghat AM (2018) Estimating soil hydraulic and solute transport parameters in subsurface drainage systems using an inverse modelling approach. Irrig Drain 67(2):82–90

  31. Shin Y, Mohanty BP, Ines AV (2012) Soil hydraulic properties in one-dimensional layered soil profile using layer-specific soil moisture assimilation scheme. Water Resour Res 48(6)

  32. Šimůnek J, Genuchten MV (1996) Estimating unsaturated soil hydraulic properties from tension disc infiltrometer data by numerical inversion. Water Resour Res 32(9):2683–2696

  33. Skaggs RW, Youssef MA, Chescheir GM (2012) DRAINMOD: model use, calibration, and validation. Trans ASABE 55(4):1509–1522

  34. Smedema LK, Vlotman WF, Rycroft DW (2004) Modern land drainage: Planning, design and management of agricultural drainage systems. Florida: CRC Press

  35. Sonnleitner MA, Abbaspour KC, Schulin R (2003) Hydraulic and transport properties of the plant–soil system estimated by inverse modelling. Eur J Soil Sci 54(1):127–138

  36. Van Dam JC, Groenendijk P, Hendriks RF, Kroes JG (2008) Advances of modeling water flow in variably saturated soils with SWAP. Vadose Zone J 7(2):640–653

  37. Vazifedoust M, Van Dam JC, Feddes RA, Feizi M (2008) Increasing water productivity of irrigated crops under limited water supply at field scale. Agric Water Manag 95(2):89–102

  38. Verma AK, Gupta SK, Isaac RK (2010) Long-term use of saline drainage waters for irrigation in subsurface drained lands: simulation modelling with SWAP. J Agric Eng Res 47(3):15–23

  39. Vrugt JA, Stauffer PH, Wöhling T, Robinson BA, Vesselinov VV (2008) Inverse modeling of subsurface flow and transport properties: a review with new developments. Vadose Zone J 7(2):843–864

  40. Wang X, Mosley CT, Frankenberger JR, Kladivko EJ (2006) Subsurface drain flow and crop yield predictions for different drain spacings using DRAINMOD. Agric Water Manag 79(2):113–136

  41. Wohling T, Vrugt JA, Barkle GF (2008) Comparison of three multiobjective optimization algorithms for inverse modeling of vadose zone hydraulic properties. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72(2):305–319

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Hamed Ebrahimian.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest Statement

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sedaghatdoost, A., Ebrahimian, H. & Liaghat, A. An Inverse Modeling Approach to Calibrate Parameters for a Drainage Model with Two Optimization Algorithms on Homogeneous/Heterogeneous Soil. Water Resour Manage 33, 1383–1395 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-2191-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Indirect methods
  • Soil properties
  • Simulation
  • Drainage
  • Khuzestan