Evaluation of Global Water Resources Reanalysis Runoff Products for Local Water Resources Applications: Case Study-Upper Blue Nile Basin of Ethiopia
- 30 Downloads
The increasing availability of global observation datasets, both from in situ and remote sensors, and advancements in earth system models and data assimilation algorithms have generated a number of water resources reanalysis products that are available at global scale and high spatial and temporal resolutions. These products hold great potential for water resources applications, but their levels of uncertainty need to be evaluated at local scale. In this work, we evaluate the runoff product from two multi-model global water resources reanalyses (WRRs), available at 0.5° (WRR1) and 0.25° (WRR2) grid resolutions, which were produced within the framework of a European Union project (eartH2Observe) in the upper Blue Nile basin. Analysis indicates that the recently released WRR2 UniK product exhibits consistently better performance statistics than the earlier coarser-resolution WRR1 and the rest of the WRR2 products at all ranges of temporal and spatial scale evaluated. Streamflow simulations based on gauged rainfall forcing and the locally set hydrological model CREST outperforms all the other products, including UniK. Global hydrological products can be a data source for various water resources planning and management applications in data-scarce areas of Africa. This study cautions against using available global hydrological products without prior uncertainty evaluation.
KeywordsBlue Nile eartH2Observe Water resource reanalysis Error characterization
This work is supported by the EU-funded eartH2Observe (ENVE.2013.6.3-3) project. The authors would like to thank the Ethiopian Ministry of Water, Irrigation, and Electricity for the updated observed river runoff data. This study is coordinated by Addis Ababa University, School of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Alcamo J, Henrichs T, Rösch T (2000) Global modeling and scenario analysis. In: Rijsberman F (ed) World water scenarios – analyses. Earthscan Publications, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration - Guidelines for computing crop water requirements - FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56, FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. ISBN 92-5-104219-5Google Scholar
- Beck H, van Dijk A, Levizzani V, Schellekens J, Miralles D, Martens B, Roo A (2017a) MSWEP: 3-hourly 0.25° global gridded precipitation (1979–2015) by merging gauge, satellite, and reanalysis data, 589–615 ppGoogle Scholar
- Burek P, Roo A, van der Knijff J (2013) LISFLOOD - distributed water balance and flood simulation model - revised user manualGoogle Scholar
- Doell P, Alcamo J, Henrichs T, Kaspar F, Lehner B, Rösch T, Siebert S (2001) The global integrated water model WaterGAP 2.1Google Scholar
- Donaldson RJ, Dyer RM, Krauss M (1975) An objective evaluator of techniques for predicting severe weather events. Preprints, Ninth Conf. on Severe Local Storms, Amer. Meteor. Soc., Norman, OK, pp 321–326Google Scholar
- Doswell C, Davies-Jones R, Keller DL (1990) On summary measures of skill in rare event forecasting based on contingency tablesGoogle Scholar
- Duan Q, Sorooshian S, Gupta V (1992) Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resour Res 28Google Scholar
- Krinner G, Viovy N, de Noblet-Ducoudré N, Ogée J, Polcher J, Friedlingstein P, Ciais P, Sitch S, Prentice IC (2005) A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere-biosphere system. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 19(1)Google Scholar
- Le Moigne P (2009) SURFEX scientific documentation, 211 ppGoogle Scholar
- Peña-Arancibia J, van Dijk A, Stenson M, Viney NR (2011) Opportunities to evaluate a landscape hydrological model (AWRA-L) using global data setsGoogle Scholar
- Shen X, Hong Y (2014) CREST Coupled Routing and Excess STorage CREST user manual v2.1. University of Oklahoma (OU) HyDROS Lab. http://hydro.ou.edu. Accessed 14 Nov 2017
- Sutcliffe JV, Parks YP (1999) The hydrology of the Nile, xi + 179 pp. IAHS Press, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
- van Dijk A, Renzullo L (2011) The role of satellite observation in Australian water resources monitoring, 10–15 ppGoogle Scholar
- Wilk MB, Gnanadesikan R (1968) Probability plotting methods for the analysis for the analysis of data. Biometrika 55(1):1–17Google Scholar
- World Bank (2018) http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/water/overview. In: World Bank edited by W. Bank. Accessed 14 Nov 2017