Advertisement

Understanding and Improving Enforcement and Compliance with Drinking Water Standards

  • Christine J. KirchhoffEmail author
  • Julia A. Flagg
  • Yan Zhuang
  • Berdakh Utemuratov
Article
  • 75 Downloads

Abstract

The quality of public drinking water poses a critical risk to public health, yet U.S. public water systems (PWSs) frequently produce water that violates drinking water standards. The causes of such violations and the effects of enforcement actions on reducing those violations remain poorly understood. We use a ten-year database of water quality violations across 2487 Connecticut (CT) water systems to test a novel analytical model that investigates drivers of water quality violations and explores the effects of enforcement actions by the state drinking water program (DWP) on the durations of violations. PWS characteristics associated with increased violations in CT include: state-ownership, groundwater dependence, and rural location. Non-transient, non-community (NTNC) systems committed fewer violations overall, but their violations lasted significantly longer than those committed by other PWS types. PWSs respond differently to formal versus informal enforcement actions, with informal enforcement actions (i.e. a letter and technical assistance) curbing duration of violations more effectively than the comparatively punitive, formal enforcement actions. Lastly, we find the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s enforcement targeting tool (ETT) somewhat helpful for restoring PWS compliance in combination with informal enforcement action, but our analysis suggests the ETT is less effective in isolation. We demonstrate a novel analytical model that provides actionable information to state DWPs charged with enforcing drinking water standards to protect the quality of public water supplies.

Keywords

Water quality Maximum contaminant level (MCL) violations Public water systems Safe drinking water act Enforcement 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (Grant No. TBD). We thank the Connecticut Department of Public Health Drinking Water Section staff for providing access to data and helpful insights in thinking about and applying our results.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

None.

Supplementary material

11269_2019_2189_MOESM1_ESM.docx (75 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 75 kb)

References

  1. Agresti A (2001) Exact inference for categorical data: recent advances and continuing controversies. Stat Med 20:2709–2722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Jasser AO (2007) Chlorine decay in drinking-water transmission and distribution systems: pipe service age effect. Water Res 41:387–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allaire M, Wu H, Lall U (2018) National trends in drinking water quality violations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115(9):2078–2083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ASDWA (2013) Insufficient resources for state drinking water programs threaten public health: an analysis of state drinking water programs’ resources and needs. Association of State Drinking Water Administrators, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  5. Balazs CL, Morello-Frosch R, Hubbard AE et al (2012) Environmental justice implications of arsenic contamination in California’s San Joaquin Valley: a cross-sectional, cluster-design examining exposure and compliance in community drinking water systems. Env. Health 11:84,  https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-11-84
  6. Bennear LS, Jessoe KK, Olmstead SM (2009) Sampling out: regulatory avoidance and the Total coliform rule. Environ Sci Technol 43:5176–5182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK (2013) Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Canfield RL, Henderson CR, Cory-Slechta DA et al (2003) Intellectual impairment in children with blood Lead concentrations below 10 μg per deciliter. N Engl J Med 348:1517–1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Canu IG, Laurent O, Pires N et al (2011) Health effects of naturally radioactive water ingestion: the need for enhanced studies. Environ Health Perspect 119:1676–1680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cassanelli JP, Robbins GA (2013) Effects of road salt on Connecticut’s groundwater: a statewide centennial perspective. J Environ Qual 42:737–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. CTDPH (2015) Sodium & Chloride in well water: health considerations. Connecticut Department of Public Health Environmental & Occupational Health Assessment Program, HartfordGoogle Scholar
  12. CTDPH (2018) Information on the Connecticut Department of Public Health Drinking Water SectionGoogle Scholar
  13. De Roos AJ, Gurian PL, Robinson LF et al (2017) Review of epidemiological studies of drinking-water turbidity in relation to acute gastrointestinal illness. Environ Health Perspect 125(8):086003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duhigg C (2009) Millions in U.S. Drink Contaminated Water, Records Show. New York TimesGoogle Scholar
  15. Fan AM, Steinberg VE (1996) Health implications of nitrate and nitrite in drinking water: an update on Methemoglobinemia occurrence and reproductive and developmental toxicity. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 23:35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fedinick KP, Wu M, Panditharatne M, Olson ED (2017) Threats on tap: widespread violations highlight need for investment in water infrastructure and protections. In: Natural resources defense council, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Flyvbjerg B (2006) Five misunderstandings about case study research. Qual Inq 12(2):219–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fortin J (2017) America’s Tap Water: Too Much Contamination, Not Enough Reporting, Study Finds. New York TimesGoogle Scholar
  19. Grellier J, Bennett J, Patelarou E et al (2010) Exposure to disinfection by-products, fetal growth, and prematurity. Epidemiology 21:300–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grooms KK (2016) Does water quality improve when a safe drinking water act violation is issued? A study of the effectiveness of the SDWA in California. B E J Econom Anal Policy 16:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harvey R, Murphy HM, McBean EA et al (2015) Using data mining to understand drinking water advisories in small water systems: a case study of Ontario first nations drinking water supplies. Water Resour Manag 29:5129–5139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hellard ME, Sinclair MI, Forbes AB, Fairley CK (2001) A randomized, blinded, controlled trial investigating the gastrointestinal health effects of drinking water quality. Environ Health Perspect 109:773–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kohli M, Rahman T, Stavang E (2016) Environmental Regulation and Compliance: Evidence from the Enforcement of the Safe Drinking Water Act. Unpublished paperGoogle Scholar
  24. Konisky DM, Teodoro MP (2016) When governments regulate governments. Am J Pol Sci 60:559–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Koorse S (2002) Enforcement Flexibility Under the Safe Drinking Water Act. NRWA white paper, Duncan, Okla. NRWA, 2004. Critical Issues In Setting Regulatory Standards. www.nrwa.org/benefits/whitepapers/TOC.htm (accessed July 2018)
  26. Lanphear BP, Hornung R, Khoury J et al (2005) Low-level environmental lead exposure and children’s intellectual function: an international pooled analysis. Environ Health Perspect 113:894–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Long JS (1997) Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  28. Long JS, Freese J (2006) Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. Stata Press, College StationGoogle Scholar
  29. Mann AG, Tam CC, Higgins CD, Rodrigues LC (2007) The association between drinking water turbidity and gastrointestinal illness: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 7:256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Messner M, Shaw S, Regli S et al (2006) An approach for developing a national estimate of waterborne disease due to drinking water and a national estimate model application. J Water Heal 4:201–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mullaney JR, Lorenz DL, Arntson A. (2009) Chloride in groundwater and surface water in areas underlain by the glacial aquifer system, northern United States. USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5086, 41pGoogle Scholar
  32. Murphy EA, Post GB, Buckley BT et al (2012) Future challenges to protecting public health from drinking-water contaminants. Annu Rev Public Health 33:209–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nwachuku N, Craun GF, Calderon RL (2002) How effective is the TCR in assessing outbreak vulnerability? J Am Water Works Assoc 94:88–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Okun DA (2003) Drinking Water and Public Health Protection. In: Drinking Water Regulation and Health. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 24pGoogle Scholar
  35. Oxenford JL, Barrett JM (2016) Understanding small water system violations and deficiencies. J Am Water Works Assoc 108:31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pahl-Wostl C, Lebel L, Knieper C, Nikitina E (2012) From applying panaceas to mastering complexity: towards adaptive water governance in river basins. Environ Sci Pol 23:11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Paulu C, Aschengrau A, Ozonoff D (1999) Tetrachloroethylene-contaminated drinking water in Massachusetts and the risk of colon-rectum, lung, and other cancers. Environ Health Perspect 107:265–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Payment P, Siemiatycki J, Richardson L et al (1997) A prospective epidemiological study of gastrointestinal health effects due to the consumption of drinking water. Int J Environ Health Res 7:5–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pike WA (2004) Modeling drinking water quality violations with Bayesian networks. J Am Water Resour Assoc 40:1563–1578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pontius FW (2003) Drinking water regulation and health. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rahman T, Kohli M, Megdal S et al (2010) Determinants of environmental noncompliance by public water systems. Contemp Econ Policy 28:264–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Reynolds KA, Mena KD, Gerba CP (2008) Risk of waterborne illness via drinking water in the United States. In: Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. Springer, New York, pp 117–158Google Scholar
  43. Rubin SJ (2013) Structural changes in the water industry from 2001 to 2011. J Am Water Works Assoc 105:53–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Scheili A, Delpla I, Sadiq R et al (2016) Impact of raw water quality and climate factors on the variability of drinking water quality in small systems. Water Resour Manag 30:2703–2718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sekercioglu MF, White J, Shrubsole D, Baxter J (2018) Towards a sustainable small non-community drinking water system in Ontario: owners’ risk awareness and perceptions to water safety. J Sustain Dev 11(3):71–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Switzer D, Teodoro MP (2017a) Class, race, ethnicity, and justice in safe drinking water compliance. Soc Sci Q 99:524–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Switzer D, Teodoro MP (2017b) The color of drinking water: class, race, ethnicity, and safe drinking water act compliance. J Am Water Works Assoc 109:40–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Symons J (2001) The early history of disinfection by-products: a personal chronicle. Environ Eng 37:20–26Google Scholar
  49. USEPA (2009) Memorandum, drinking water enforcement response policy. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  50. USEPA (2016) Drinking Water: EPA Needs to Take Additional Steps to Ensure Small Community Water Systems Designated as Serious Violators Achieve Compliance. United States Environmental Protection Agency Report No. 16-P-0108, Washington, DC. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-03/documents/20160322-16-p-0108.pdf
  51. USEPA (2017) Information about public water systems. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC https://www.epa.gov/dwreginfo/information-about-public-water-systems Google Scholar
  52. Wallsten S, Kosec K (2008) The effects of ownership and benchmark competition: an empirical analysis of U.S. water systems. Int J Ind Organ 26:186–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Weinmeyer JD, Annalise N, Kawarski M, Higgins E (2017) The Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 and Its Role in Providing Access to Safe Drinking Water in the United States. AMA Journal of Ethics 19:1018–1026Google Scholar
  54. WHO (2004) Guidelines for drinking-water quality. Water Sanitation Health 1:515Google Scholar
  55. Wuijts S, Driessen PPJ, Van Rijswick HFMW (2018) Governance conditions for improving quality drinking water resources: the need for enhancing connectivity. Water Resour Manag 32:1245–1260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yin RK (2013) Validity and generalization in future case study evaluations. SAGE Publ Sage UK: London, England 19(3):321–332Google Scholar
  57. Yoshida T, Yamauchi H, Fan Sun G (2004) Chronic health effects in people exposed to arsenic via the drinking water: dose-response relationships in review. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 198:243–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zamenian H, Mannering FL, Abraham DM et al (2017) Modeling the Frequency of Water Main Breaks in Water Distribution Systems: Random-Parameters Negative-Binomial Approach. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 23:04016035Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA
  2. 2.Department of Sociology and Environmental Studies ProgramConnecticut CollegeNew LondonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Mathematics and StatisticsConnecticut CollegeNew LondonUSA

Personalised recommendations