Advertisement

Survival Function in the Analysis of the Factors Influencing the Reliability of Water Wells Operation

  • Kozłowski Edward
  • Kowalska Beata
  • Kowalski DariuszEmail author
  • Mazurkiewicz Dariusz
Article
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

In common studies on the groundwater intake reliability, suitable methods of statistical interference are usually employed in order to use the analysis and modelling results in relation to the entire population. Exponential distribution of random variables and events, Weibull distribution, normal, log-normal distribution as well as Poisson distribution are used most frequently. The distribution type of failure duration is identified on the basis of the data collected from a random investigated sample. The data collected for this purpose, apart from the object identification, usually pertain to the information on damages, service activities and intervals in operation. However, in some cases, additional data is required, because the reliability of water intakes is also influenced by the quality and quantity of water in the source. This is why, this paper will present an analysis of reliability data from a water supply sources consisting of deep wells taking into consideration additional, potential failure reasons. The aim of the study is to provide a tool of comparison of deep wells reliability, considering that the biggest differences between survival functions is a measure of reliability between objects.

Keywords

Water intakes Water wells Reliability Survival function 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Paper financed by statutory activity of Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Lublin University of Technology.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interests

There is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Almalki SJ, Nadarajah S (2014) Modification of the Weibull distribution: a review. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 124:32–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bicking F, Weber P, Theilliol D. (2013) Reliability importance measures for fault tolerant control alloca-tion. Conference on control and fault-tolerant systems (SysTol), pp 104–109Google Scholar
  3. Chaurasiya PK, Ahmed S, Warudkar V (2018) Study of different parameters estimation methods of Weibull distribution to determine wind power density using ground based Doppler SODAR instrument. Alex Eng J.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2017.08.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cox D (1972) Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser B 34Google Scholar
  5. Debón A, Carrión C, Cabrera E, Solano H (2010) Comparing risk of failure models in water supply networks using ROC curves. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95:43–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gertsbakh IB (2000) Reliability theory: with applications to preventive maintenance. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. Goode KB, Moore J, Roylance BJ (2000) Plant machinery working life prediction method utilizing reliability and condition-monitoring data. Proc Inst Mech Eng E J Process Mech Eng 21:4109–4122Google Scholar
  8. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The elements of statistical learning. Data mining, inference and prediction. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  9. Jardine AKS, Anderson PM, Mann DS (1987) Application of the Weibull proportional hazards model to air craft and marine engine failure data. Qual Reliabil Eng 3:77–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jardine AKS, Lin D, Banjevic D (2006) A review on machinery diagnostics and prognostics implementing condition-based maintenance. Mech Syst Signal Process 20:1483–1510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jiang R, Jardine A (2008) Health state evaluation of an item: a general framework and graphical representation. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93(1):89–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jiang R, Ji P, Xiao X (2003) Aging property of unimodal failure rate models. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 79:113–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kabir G, Tesfamariam SR (2015) Predicting water main failures using Bayesian model averaging and survival modelling approach. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 142:498–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kettler AJ, Goulter IC (1985) An analysis of pipe breakage in urban water distribution networks. Can J Civil Eng 122:86–93Google Scholar
  15. Kleiner Y, Rajani B (2001) Comprehensive review of structural deterioration of water mains: statistical models. Urban Water 3(3):131–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kleiner Y, Rajani B (2002) Forecasting variations and trends in watermain breaks. J Infrastruct Syst 8(4):122–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kobbacy KAH, Fawzi BB, Percy DF, Ascher HE (1997) A full history proportional hazards model for preventive maintenance scheduling. Qual Reliabil Eng Int 13:187–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kozłowski E, Mazurkiewicz D, Kowalska B, Kowalski D (2017) Binary linear programming as a decision-making aid for water intake operators. In: Intelligent Systems in Production Engineering and Maintenance – ISPEM, pp 199–208  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64465-3_20 Google Scholar
  19. Lansey KE (2006) The evolution of optimizing water distribution system applications. Eighth annual Water Distribution Systems Analysis symposium (WDSA) August 27–30, Cincinnati, Ohio, USAGoogle Scholar
  20. Lei J (1997) Statistical approach for describing lifetimes of water mains-case Trondheim municipally. Report no. 22f007. 28, SINTEF Civil and Environmental Engineering, Trondheim, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  21. Liu H, Savic D, Kapelan Z, Creaco E, Yuan Y (2017) Reliability surrogate measures for water distribution system design: comparative analysis. J Water Resour Plan Manag 143(2).  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000728 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Marques J, Cunha MC, Sousa J, Savic D (2011) Robust optimization methodologies for water supply systems design. Eleventh international conference on computing and control for the water industry, vol 1. Urban Water Management: Challenges and Opportunities. Exeter, pp 89–94Google Scholar
  23. Ostveld A (2001) Reliability analysis of regional water distribution systems. Urban Water 3:137–144Google Scholar
  24. Ostveld A (2004) Reliability analysis of water distribution systems. J Hydroinf 6(4):281–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Salazar JC, Weber P, Sarrate R, Theilliol D, Nejjari F (2015) MPC design based on a DBN reliability model: application to drinking water networks. IFAC- Papers OnLine 48-21, pp 688–693Google Scholar
  26. Scarpa F, Lobba A, Becciu G (2015) Expeditious pump rescheduling in multisource water distribution networks. Procedia Eng 119:1078–1087.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.938 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sun Y, Ma L, Mathew J, Wang W, Zhang S (2006) Mechanical systems hazard estimation using condition monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process 20:1189–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. van Noortwijk JM (2009) A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(1):2–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Volk PJ, Wnek M, Zygmunt M (2004) Utilising statistical residual life estimates of bearing to quantify the influence of preventive maintenance action. Mech Syst Signal Process 18:833–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Weibull W (1951) A statistical distribution function of wide applicability. J Appl Mech 18(3):293–297Google Scholar
  31. Wu NE (2001) Reliability of fault tolerant control systems: part I. In Proceedings of the 40th IEEE conference on decision and control, vol 2, pp 1460–1465Google Scholar
  32. Wu NE, Wang X, Sampath M, Kott G (2002) An operational approach to budget-constrained reliabil-ity allocation. In: 15th IFAC world congress. Barcelona, Spain, pp 113–118Google Scholar
  33. Yamijala S, Guikema SD, Brumbelow K (2009) Statistical models for the analysis of water distribution system pipe break data. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94:282–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhang Q, Hua C, Xu G (2014) A mixture Weibull proportional hazard model for mechanical system failure prediction utilising lifetime and monitoring data. Mech Syst Signal Process 43:103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Management, Department of Quantitative Methods in ManagementLublin University of TechnologyLublinPoland
  2. 2.Faculty of Environmental Engineering, Department of Water Supply and Wastewater DisposalLublin University of TechnologyLublinPoland
  3. 3.Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Production EngineeringLublin University of TechnologyLublinPoland

Personalised recommendations