Advertisement

A New Risk Assessment System Based on Set Pair Analysis – Variable Fuzzy Sets for Underground Reservoirs

  • Min Li
  • Tianyuan ZhengEmail author
  • Jian Zhang
  • Yunhai Fang
  • Jiang Liu
  • Xilai ZhengEmail author
  • Hui Peng
Article
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

The effects of underground reservoir operation have important scientific significance and application value for the development, utilisation, and management of groundwater resources. Based on the investigation of hydrogeological conditions and operation management of the Dagu River underground reservoir, a new assessment system for the operation effects of the underground reservoir was established. In this study, water quantity, water quality, pollution source, vulnerability, and economic benefits of the underground reservoir were considered assessment indexes.. And we used a coupled set pair analysis and variable fuzzy set (SPA-VFS) to evaluate the Dagu Rive underground reservoir. The assessment results show that the assessment indexes of groundwater exploitation rate, groundwater exploitation modulus, wastewater treatment rate, and economic benefit ratio are good, but the water quality of the reservoir area is usually poor, the fertilizer application rate is high, and the aquifer vulnerability is weak.

Keywords

Underground reservoir Operation effect Assessment system Set pair analysis Variable fuzzy set SPA-VFS 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the National Natural Science Foundation of China-Shandong Joint Fund (grant number U1806210) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 41731280) for funding this project.

References

  1. Beganskas S, Fisher AT et al (2017) Coupling distributed stormwater collection and managed aquifer recharge: field application and implications. J Environ Manag 200:366–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ben Ahmed C, Magdich S, Ben Rouina B (2012) Saline water irrigation effects on soil salinity distribution and some physiological responses of field grown Chemlali olive. J Environ Manag 113(1):538–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bin XU, Lin CY, Mao XW et al (2014) Analysis of applicability of Nemerow pollution index to evaluation of water quality of Taihu Lake. Water Resources Protection 30(2):38–40Google Scholar
  4. Bouwer H (2002) Artificial recharge of groundwater: hydrogeology and engineering. Hydrogeol J 10(1):121–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carreras X, Fraile J, Garrido T (2015) Groundwater vulnerability mapping assessment using overlay and the DRASTIC method in Catalonia. Experiences from Ground, Coastal and Transitional Water 43:117–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen SY, Guo Y et al (2006) Variable fuzzy sets and its application in comprehensive risk evaluation for flood-control engineering system. Fuzzy Optim Decis Ma 5(2):153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Delgado A, Romero I (2016) Environmental conflict analysis using an integrated grey clustering and entropy-weight method: a case study of a mining project in Peru. Environ Model Softw 77:108–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deng MJ (2012) Ground reservoir: a new pattern of groundwater utilization in arid north-West China -a case study in Tailan River basin. Procedia Environ Sci 13:2210–2221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. El-Naqa A, Al-Momani M, Kilani S (2010) Groundwater deterioration of shallow groundwater aquifers due to overexploitation in Northeast Jordan. CLEAN - Soil Air Water 35(2):156–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fang YH, Zheng XL, Peng H (2018) Evaluation of groundwater quality based on fuzzy synthetic evaluation and variable fuzzy sets. Acta Scientiae Circu mstantiae 38(2):546–552Google Scholar
  11. Guo EL, Zhang JQ, Ren XH (2014) Integrated risk assessment of flood disaster based on improved set pair analysis and the variable fuzzy set theory in Central Liaoning Province, China. Nat Hazards 74(2):947–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jiao SX, Wang LC, Yang SX (2012) Security Assessment of Urban Drinking Water Sources Based on Triangular Fuzzy Numbers-A Case Study of Anyang City,Henan Province. Journal of Natural Resources 27(7):1112–1123Google Scholar
  13. Lee SC, DH, Lee JD (2014) A new approach to measuring shadow price: reconciling engineering and economic perspectives. Energy Econ 46:66–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li B, Yang GS, Wan R (2017) Using fuzzy theory and variable weights for water quality evaluation in Poyang Lake, China. Chin Geogr Sci 27(1):39–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li WJ, Qiu L, Chen XN (2011) Assessment model for river ecology health based on set pair analysis and variable fuzzy set. J Hydraul Eng 42(7):775–782Google Scholar
  16. Li WL, Shu LC, Yin ZZ (2006) Concept and design theory of groundwater reservoir. J Hydraul Eng 37:613–618Google Scholar
  17. Ma JZ (2003) The ecological and environmental problems caused by the excessive exploitation and utilization of groundwater resources in the Minqin Basin, Gansu Province. Arid Zone Research 20(4):261–265Google Scholar
  18. Masciopinto C (2013) Management of aquifer recharge in Lebanon by removing seawater intrusion from coastal aquifers. J Environ Manag 130:306–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maxwell RM, Kastenberg WE, Rubin Y (1999) A methodology to integrate site characterization information into groundwater-driven health risk assessment. Water Resour Res 35(9):2841–2855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Su MR, Yang ZF, Chen B (2009) Set pair analysis for urban ecosystem health assessment. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 14(4):1773–1780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tang R et al (2013) Hydro-chemical characteristics and water quality assessment of groundwater in Suihua City. Water resources protection 29(4):19-25+81Google Scholar
  22. Tesfamariam S, Sadiq R (2006) Risk-based environmental decision-making using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP). Stoch Env Res Risk A 21(1):35–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Uddameri V, Honnungar V, Hernandez EA (2014) Assessment of groundwater water quality in central and southern Gulf Coast aquifer, TX using principal component analysis. Environ Earth Sci 71(6):2653–2671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Valenti WC, Kimpara JM, Preto BDL et al (2018) Indicators of sustainability to assess aquaculture systems. Ecol Indic 88:402–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang WS, Jin JL, Ding J (2009) A new approach to water resources system assessment-set pair analysis method. Science in China 52(10):3017–3023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang YK, Sheng D, Wang D (2014) Variable fuzzy set theory to assess water quality of the Meiliang Bay in Taihu Lake Basin. Water Resour Manag 28(3):867–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zhang B, Song X, Zhang Y (2012) Hydrochemical characteristics and water quality assessment of surface water and groundwater in Songnen plain, Northeast China. Water Res 46(8):0–2748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang D, Wang GL, Zhou HC (2011) Assessment on agricultural drought risk based on variable fuzzy sets model. Chinese Geogr Sci 21(2):167–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang Y, Li CM, Li F (2010) Assessment of water quality security of reservoir-based drinking water sources in Chongqing City. Journal of Yangtze River scientific research institute 27(10):19-22+29Google Scholar
  30. Zhao KQ (1989). Set pair and set pair analysis-a new concept and systematic analysis method. In: Proceedings of the national conference on system theory and regional planning.87–91Google Scholar
  31. Zhu DS, Zhang JY, Cheng HG (2010) Security assessment of urban drinking water sources I: Indicator system and assessment method. Journal of Hydraulic 9(8):914–920Google Scholar
  32. Zou Q, Zhou JZ, Zhou C (2013) Comprehensive flood risk assessment based on set pair analysis-variable fuzzy sets model and fuzzy AHP. Stoch Env Res Risk A 27(2):525–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Environmental Science and EngineeringOcean University of ChinaQingdaoChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Marine Environment and Ecological EducationOcean University of ChinaQingdaoChina
  3. 3.College of EngineeringOcean University of ChinaQingdaoChina
  4. 4.Limited company of Qingdao Huayi environmental protection technologyQingdaoChina
  5. 5.Shandong Hydrology BureauJinanChina

Personalised recommendations