Performance Evaluation of a Fuzzy Hybrid Clustering Technique to Identify Flood Source Areas
- 32 Downloads
Prioritization of flood source areas (FSAs) is of paramount importance in flood management to adopt proportional measures within a watershed. Unit Flood Response (UFR) approach has been proposed to identify FSAs at subwatershed and/or cell scale. In this study, a distributed modified Clark (ModClark) model coupled with Muskingum flow routing method was used for hydrological simulations. Furthermore, SOMFCM clustering techniques involving Self-Organizing Feature Maps (SOFM) and Fuzzy C-Means algorithm (FCM) were used to identify Hydrologic Homogenous Regions (HHRs). The case studies were two semi-arid watersheds including Tangrah in northeastern Iran and eastern part of Walnut Gulch Experimental Watershed (WGEW) in Arizona. DEM-derived geomorphological and hydrological features were entered into Factor Analysis (FA) to determine the most effective variables in runoff generation. The optimum SOMFCM resulted in clustered HHRs map which was generally similar to that of the UFR-delineated FSAs at cell scale, especially in cases of maximum flood index values for both watersheds. Although clustering techniques, such as SOMFCM, cannot directly provide a map of FSAs involving absolute values of flood index, most dominant watershed physical features may be used to identify the most critical, or effective FSAs through clustered HHRs. Application of SOMFCM in two semi-arid watersheds demonstrated that SOMFCM provides a simple and useful tool to qualitatively identify the ranking of FSAs across a watershed. Therefore, the clustered HHRs involving higher ranks of FSAs that represent the most flood active regions, are expected to assist policymakers for effective management of floods.
KeywordsFlood source areas (FSAs) Fuzzy C-means algorithm (FCM) Hydrologic homogenous regions (HHRs) Distributed ModClark Self-organizing feature maps (SOFM) Unit flood response (UFR)
The authors appreciate the data provided by the USDA-ARS Southwest Watershed Research Center in Tucson Arizona, USA. The authors would also like to offer their special thanks to Dr. Mohammad Elmi for his help in software development.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
- Fukuyama Y, Sugeno M (1989) A new method of choosing the number of clusters for the fuzzy c-means method. In: Proceedings of the fifth fuzzy systems symposium, Ankara, Turkey: 247–250Google Scholar
- Kull DW, Feldman AD (1998) Evaluation of Clark’s unit graph method to spatially distributed runoff. ASCE J Hydrol Eng 3(1):9–19. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)4:1(89) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rao AR, Srinivas VV (2008) Regionalization of watersheds - an approach based on cluster analysis. Water science and technology library, Vol. 58. Springer Netherlands, science+business media B. V., pp. 248Google Scholar
- Saghafian B, Khosroshahi M (2005) Unit response approach for priority determination of flood source areas. ASCE J Hydrol Eng 25:270–277. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2005)10:4(270) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (2006) Hydrologic modeling system HEC-HMS user’s manual. Hydrologic Engineering Center, Davis, CAGoogle Scholar
- USDA, United States Department of Agriculture (2007) Agricultural Research Service, Southwest Watershed Research Center, Tucson, Arizona. <http://www.tucson.ars.ag.gov/swrc_site/research/wgew> (Aug. 17, 2018)
- Weiss A (2001) Topographic position and landforms analysis. ESRI User Conference, San Diego, CAGoogle Scholar