Advertisement

Multi-Objective Optimization of Hydropower and Agricultural Development at River Basin Scale

  • Amir Hatamkhani
  • Ali MoridiEmail author
Article
  • 64 Downloads

Abstract

The need for achieving efficient, equitable and sustainable use of water resources to meet water demands of different sectors is necessary, particularly in areas where water resources are decreasing. In the basins where water is required for both energy production and irrigation, allocation of water resources must be planned in such a way that both objectives can be achieved. In this research, a simulation-optimization approach has been used to solve the problem of optimal planning at the watershed scale. The water evaluation and planning system (WEAP) simulation model link with the multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MOPSO) model for optimal long term planning at the basin scale. Therefore, the objective functions of the problem are 1) maximize the cultivation area of agricultural development sectors and 2) maximize the energy produced by the hydropower plant. The developed simulation-optimization model was employed in the problem of optimal water resources planning in the Kashkan river basin in the west of Iran. The Pareto front obtained represents the best trade-off between hydropower and agricultural development in the basin and can be used for water-energy-food nexus planning. For example one of the solutions of Pareto front, in addition to an increase of about 8% of the objective function 2 (generated energy), the value of the objective function 1 (cultivation area) is approximately 5 times higher than the results of previous studies. This demonstrates the proper performance of the simulation-optimization model in the optimal allocation and planning of water resources at the basin scale based on the water-energy-food nexus approach.

Keywords

Hydropower Multiobjective Optimization MOPSO WEAP Water resources planning Agricultural development 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research has been supported by the research grant no. 600/1181 funded by Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

There is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Afshar MH (2012) Large scale reservoir operation by constrained particle swarm optimization algorithms. J Hydro Environ R 6(1):75–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Afshar A, Massoumi F, Afshar A, Mariño MA (2015) State of the art review of ant colony optimization applications in water resource management. Water Resour Manag 29(11):3891–3904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed JA, Sarma AK (2005) Genetic algorithm for optimal operating policy of a multipurpose reservoir. Water Resour Manag 19(2):145–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baltar AM, Fontane DG (2008) Use of multiobjective particle swarm optimization in water resources management. J Water Resour Plan Manag 134:257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonner V (1989) HEC-5: simulation of flood control and conservation systems (for microcomputers). Modelsimulation. Hydrologic Engineering Center, DavisGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheng CT, Wang WC, Xu DM, Chau KW (2007) Optimizing hydropower reservoir operation using hybrid genetic algorithm and chaos. Water Resour Manag 22(7):895–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chau KW (2007) A split-step particle swarm optimization algorithm in river stage forecasting. J Hydrol 346:131–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coello CAC, Pulido GT, Lechuga MS (2004) Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 8:256–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dhaubanjar S, Davidsen C, Bauer-Gottwein P (2017) Multi-Objective Optimization for Analysis of Changing Trade-Offs in the Nepalese Water–Energy–Food Nexus with Hydropower Development. Water 9:162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Draper AJ, Munévar A, Arora SK, Reyes E, Parker NL, Chung FI, Peterson LE (2004) CalSim: generalized model for reservoir system analysis. J Water Resour Plan Manag 130:480–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Environment DW (2006) MIKE basin simulation model: a versatile decision support tool for integrated water resources management and planning, Horshelm. http://www.dhisoftware.com/mikebasin/index
  12. Fallah-Mehdipour E, Haddad OB, Marino MA (2011) MOPSO algorithm and its application in multi-purpose multi-reservoir operation J. Hydroinform 13(4):794–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fadaeizadeh K, Shourian M (2019) Determination of the Optimal River Basin-Wide Agricultural Water Demand Quantities Meeting Satisfactory Reliability Levels. Water Resour Manag 33: 2665. 10.1007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feng Z, Niu W, Zhou J, Cheng C (2017) Multi-objective operation optimization of a cascaded hydropower system. J Water Resour Plann Manage ASCE 143(10):05017010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hatamkhani A, Alizadeh H (2018) Clean-development-mechanism-based optimal hydropower capacity design. J Hydroinf 20(6):1401–1418Google Scholar
  16. Hydraulics D (1991) RIBASIM River basin simulation. Project completion report to Water Resources Commission, TaipeiGoogle Scholar
  17. Hong WC (2008) Rainfall forecasting by technological machine learning models. Appl Math Comput 200(1):41–57Google Scholar
  18. Gill MK, Kaheil YH, Khalil A, McKee M, Bastidas L (2006) Multi-objective particle swarm optimization for parameter estimation in hydrology. Water Resour Res 42(7)Google Scholar
  19. Kennedy J, Eberhart RC (1995) Particle swarm optimization. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Neural Networks IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, pp 1942–1948Google Scholar
  20. Labadie J (1995) MODSIM: River basin network flow model for conjunctive stream-aquifer management. Program User Manual and Documentation, Colorado State UniversityGoogle Scholar
  21. Louati MH, Benabdallah S, Lebdi F, Milutin D (2011) Application of a Genetic Algorithm for the optimization of a complex reservoir system in Tunisia. Water Resour Manag.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9814-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mahab Ghods Consulting Engineers (2011) Systematic Studies of Karkheh BasinGoogle Scholar
  23. Moridi A (2019) A bankruptcy method for pollution load reallocation in river systems. J Hydroinf 21(1):45–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moridi A, Yazdi J (2017) Optimal Allocation of Flood Control Capacity for Multi-Reservoir Systems Using Multi-Objective Optimization Approach. J Water Resour Manag 31:4521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ostadrahimi L, Mariño MA, Afshar A (2012) Multi-reservoir operation rules: multi-swarm PSO-based optimization approach. Water Resour Manag 26:407–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Parsopoulos KE, Vrahatis MN (2002) Particle swarm optimization method in multiobjective problems. In: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM symposium on applied computing ACM 603–607Google Scholar
  27. Razi Khosroshahi M, Mousavi SJ, Alizadeh H (2015) Upstream Effects on Aras Cascade Hydropower Plants System. 10th International Congress on Civil Engineering University of TabrizGoogle Scholar
  28. Rezaei F, Safavi HR, Mirchi A, Madani K (2017) f-MOPSO: An alternative multi-objective PSO algorithm for conjunctive water use management. J Hydro-Environ Res 14:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Samora I, Franca MJ, Schleiss AJ (2016) Simulated Annealing in Optimization of Energy Production in a Water Supply Network. Water Resour Manag 30:1533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sharif M, Wardlaw R (2000) Multi-reservoir systems optimization using genetic algorithms: Case study. J. Comput. Civ. Eng 14:4(255), 255–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. SEI (1999) WEAP: water evaluation and planning. Tellus Institute, BostonGoogle Scholar
  32. Shourian M, Mousavi S, Tahershamsi A (2008) Basin-wide water resources planning by integrating PSO algorithm and MODSIM. Water Resour Manag 22:1347–1366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sieber J, Purkey D (2011) WEAP: Water Evaluation And Planning System. Stockholm Environment Institute, US Center, SomervilleGoogle Scholar
  34. Sidiropoulos E, Fotakis D (2016) Spatial water resource allocation using a multi-objective ant colony optimization. European Water 55:41–51Google Scholar
  35. Wang Y, Shi HS, Wang J, Zhang Y (2015) Research and application of water resources optimized distribution model in inter-basin water transfer project. In: Applied mechanics and materials, trans tech publ, pp 683–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yeh WWG (1985) Reservoir management and operation models: A state-of-the-art review. Water Resour Res 21(12):1797–1818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yazdi J, Moridi A (2018) Multi-Objective Differential Evolution for Design of Cascade Hydropower Reservoir Systems. Water Resour Manag 32:4779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yuan XH, Zhang YC, Yuan YB (2008) Improved self-adaptive chaotic genetic algorithm for hydro-generation scheduling. J Water Resour Plan Manag 134:319–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang R, Zhou J, Ouyang S, Wang X, Zhang H (2013) Optimal operation of multi-reservoir system by multi-elite guide particle swarm optimization. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 48:58–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zeng R, Cai X, Ringler C, Zhu T (2017) Hydropower versus irrigation an analysis of global patterns. Environ Res Lett 12:034006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhao X, Harbor J, Engel B, Theller L, Yu F, Cao G, Cui Y, Tang W, Zhang M (2018) Analysis of food-energy-water nexus based on competitive uses of stream flows of BeiChuan River in eastern QingHai-Tibet Plateau, China. Environ. Prog. Sustainable Energy 37:62–72Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Civil, Water and Environmental Engineering FacultyShahid Beheshti UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations