Advertisement

Modeling the Infiltration Capacity of Permeable Stormwater Channels with a Check Dam System

  • Ahmed Mohammed Sami Al-JanabiEmail author
  • Badronnisa Yusuf
  • Abdul Halim Ghazali
Article
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

The use of permeable stormwater channels has introduced concerns over the effects of infiltration on the hydraulic behavior of their flow and the effects of flow hydraulic conditions (e.g., the water level, channel section, flow velocity, and vegetation) on the channel infiltration capacity. A check dam system provides backwater ponding, which increases the flow water depth along a channel. In this study, a channel model was used to investigate the variation in the infiltration capacity of permeable stormwater channels under different flow hydraulic conditions. Increasing the downstream check dam height and using a grass cover increased the infiltration rate and cumulative infiltration because of the decreased velocity and increased flow depth. The presence of subsurface water did not affect the hydraulic characteristics of the channel flow but decreased the cumulative infiltration because of the fast saturation of the soil. An empirical equation was developed for predicting the infiltration capacity of grassed channels in which four hydraulic parameters (i.e., the water depth, base width, side slope, and velocity) are introduced to the modified Kostiakov model. The developed model was used to calculate the runoff reduction due to infiltration along a grassed channel with and without a check dam system. The percentage of infiltrated water increased from 8 to 14% with the check dam system. The developed model can be used to predict the infiltration capacity of permeable channels for improved stormwater management and provides a valuable decision support tool for permeable channel design.

Keywords

Stormwater Permeable channel Infiltration capacity Modified Kostiakov model Check dam system 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. Akan AO (2010) Open channel hydraulics. Elsevier Ltd., AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Azawi SA (1985) Experimental evaluation of infiltration models. J Hydrol 24(2):77–88Google Scholar
  3. Al-Janabi AM, Ghazali AH, Yusuf B, Mohammed TA (2018) Permeable channel cross section for maximizing stormwater infiltration and seepage rates. J Irrig Drain Eng 144(3):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al-Janabi AM, Ghazali AH, Yusuf B (2019) Modified models for better prediction of infiltration rates in trapezoidal permeable stormwater channels. Hydrol Sci J (in press)Google Scholar
  5. ASCE (1993) Design and construction of urban stormwater management systems: ASCE manuals and reports on engineering practice no. 77. American Society of Civil Engineers, RestonGoogle Scholar
  6. Caltrans (2012) Caltrans storm water quality handbook: biofiltration swale design guidance. California Department of Transportation, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  7. Carleton GB (2010) Simulation of groundwater mounding beneath hypothetical stormwater infiltration basins, scientific investigations report 2010–5102. US Geological Survey, Reston, p 64Google Scholar
  8. CCSMDM (2014) Columbia County stormwater management design manual. Open channel design, Columbia County, GAGoogle Scholar
  9. Chow VT (1959) Open channel hydraulics. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. DID (2012) Urban stormwater management manual for Malaysia, 2nd edn. Department of Irrigation and Drainage, Kuala LumpurGoogle Scholar
  11. DPLG (2010) Water sensitive urban design technical manual for the greater Adelaide region. Department of Planning and Local Government, AdelaideGoogle Scholar
  12. DSD (2013) Stormwater drainage manual, 4th edn. Drainage Services Department, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  13. Elhanafy H, Copeland G (2007) The effect of water stage on the infiltration rate for initially dry channels. In: 2nd IMA international conference on flood risk assessment. Strathclyde University, GlasgowGoogle Scholar
  14. Ferguson BK (1994) Stormwater infiltration. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  15. Grinden A (2014) Numerical modeling of combined hydraulics and infiltration in grassed swales. MSc thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Trondheim, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  16. Israelson OW, Hansen VE (1967) Irrigation principles and practices. Wiley, New York, pp 198–200Google Scholar
  17. Kresic N (2006) Hydrogeology and groundwater modeling, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  18. Mbagwu JSC (1994) Soil physical properties influencing the fitting parameters in Philip and Kostiakov infiltration models. Discov Innov 9(3):179–187Google Scholar
  19. Philip JR (1958) The theory of infiltration. 6. Effect of water depth over soil. Soil Sci 85:278–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rawls WJ, Ahuja LR, Brakensiek DL, Shirmohammadi A (1993) Infiltration and soil water movement. In: Handbook of hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 5.1–5.51Google Scholar
  21. Schmid BH (1989) On overland flow modelling: can rainfall excess be treated as independent of flow depth? J Hydrol 107:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Turner ER (2006) Comparison of infiltration equations and their field validation with rainfall simulation. MSc thesis, University of Maryland, College ParkGoogle Scholar
  23. Wallach R, Grigorin G, Rivlin J (1997) The errors in surface runoff prediction by neglecting the relationship between infiltration rate and overland flow depth. J Hydrol 200:243–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wanielista MP, Yousef YA, Avellaneda E (1988) Alternatives for the treatment of groundwater contaminants: infiltration capacity of roadside swales. Report no. FL-ER-38-88. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), TallahasseeGoogle Scholar
  25. WEF (2012) Design of urban stormwater controls. Water Environment Federation, AlexandriaGoogle Scholar
  26. Yu SL, Kuo JT, Fassman EA, Pan H (2001) Field test of grassed swale performance in removing runoff pollution. J Water Resour Plan Manag 127(3):168–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversiti Putra MalaysiaUPM SerdangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations