Advertisement

Multi-Objective Planning for Conjunctive Use of Surface and Ground Water Resources Using Genetic Programming

  • Reza Sepahvand
  • Hamid R. SafaviEmail author
  • Farshad Rezaei
Article
  • 37 Downloads

Abstract

In arid and semi-arid regions, climate change causes a drastic decline in the volume of water resources as water demands increase. Thus, the present study is aimed at using a simulation-optimization model to perform conjunctive management of surface-ground water use to achieve two main objectives: (1) minimizing shortages in meeting irrigation water demands and (2) maximizing the total agricultural net benefit for the main crops of an agricultural sector. To meet these main goals, first, the genetic programming (GP) method is used to simulate surface water-groundwater interactions. Then, the simulation model is linked to a multi-objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) as the optimization model, yielding a simulation-optimization model. In order to investigate the impact of different climatic conditions on the optimized surface and ground water allocation and propose an optimal crop pattern for each climatic period, three planning periods (wet, normal and dry) were addressed in modeling the conjunctive water use management problem. Finally, the economic results of this study suggested a maximum increase in the net benefit by 38.19%, 59.37% and 45%, as compared to those obtained in the actual operation in wet, normal and dry years, respectively, for one study sub-area. The net benefit was also increased by at most 84.79%, 83.3% and 120.77% in wet, normal and dry years, respectively, for another study sub-area, demonstrating the competence of the optimal conjunctive use model to enhance net benefits with the least negative socio-environmental impacts resulting from any development and management scheme in the field of water resources.

Keywords

Conjunctive use Multi-crop pattern planning Simulation-optimization Multi-objective optimization Genetic programming Compromise programming 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Barlow PM, Ahlfeld DP, Dickerman DC (2003) Conjunctive-management models for sustained yield of stream-aquifer systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag 129(1):35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhattacharjya RK, Datta B (2005) Optimal management of coastal aquifers using linked simulation optimization approach. Water Resour Manag 19(3):295–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bazargan-Lari MR, Kerachian R, Mansoori A (2009) A conflict-resolution model for the conjunctive use of surface and groundwater resources that considers water-quality issues: a case study. Environ Manag 43(3):470–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cobaner M, Babayigit B, Dogan A (2016) Estimation of groundwater levels with surface observations via genetic programming. American Water Works Association 108(6):36–39Google Scholar
  5. Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T (2002) A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6(2):182–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fallah-Mehdipour E, BozorgHaddad O, Marino MA (2014) Genetic programming in groundwater modeling. J Hydrol Eng 19(12):04014031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harmancioglu NB, Barbaros F, Cetinkaya CP (2013) Sustainability issues in water management. Water Resour Manag 27(6):1867–1891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jyothiprakash, V, Magar RB, (2012) Multi-step ahead daily and hourly intermittent reservoir inflow prediction using artificial intelligence techniques using lumped and distributed data. J Hydrol 450:293–307Google Scholar
  9. Koza JR (1994) Genetic programming as a means for programming computers by natural selection. Stat Comput 4(2):87–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Li M, Fu Q, Singh V, Liu D (2018) An interval multi-objective programming model for irrigation water allocation under uncertainty. Agric Water Manag 196:24–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mani A, Tsai F, Kao T-C, Naz S-C, Ashfaq SN, Rastogi D (2016) Conjunctive management of surface and groundwater resources under projected future climate change scenarios. J Hydrol 540:397–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Matsukawa J, Finney BA, Willis R (1992) Conjunctive-use planning in Mad river basin, California. J Water Resour Plan Manag 118(2):115–132Google Scholar
  13. Milan SG, Roozbahani A, Banihabib ME (2018) Fuzzy optimization model and fuzzy inference system for conjunctive use of surface and groundwater resources. J Hydrol 566:421–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mirajkar AB, Patel PL (2016) Multiobjective two-phase fuzzy optimizationapproaches in management of water resources. J Water Resour Plan Manag.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000682
  15. Rafipour-Langeroudi M, Kerachian R, Bazargan-Lari MR (2014) Developing operating rules for conjunctive use of surface and groundwater considering the water quality issues. KSCE J Civ Eng 18(2):454–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rezaei F, Safavi HR, Mirchi A, Madani K (2017a) f-MOPSO: an alternative multi-objective PSO algorithm for conjunctive water use management. J Hydro Environ Res 14:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rezaei F, Safavi HR, Zekri (2017b) A hybrid fuzzy-based multi-objective PSO algorithm for conjunctive water use and optimal multi-Crop pattern planning. Water Resour Manag 31(4):1139–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Safavi HR, Darzi F, Mariño MA (2010) Simulation-optimization modeling of conjunctive use of surface water and groundwater. Water Resour Manag 24(10):1965–1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shi F, Zhao C, Sun D, Peng D, Han M (2012) Conjunctive use of surface and groundwater in central Asia area: a case study of the Tailan River Basin. Stoch Env Res Risk A 26:145–169Google Scholar
  20. Singh A (2014) Simulation–optimization modeling for conjunctive water use management. Agric Water Manag 141:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Srivastava P, Singh RM (2017) Agricultural land allocation for crop planning in a canal command area using fuzzy multiobjective goal programming. J Irrig Drain Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001175
  22. Sun Q, Xu G, Ma C, Chen L (2017) Optimal crop-planting area considering the agricultural drought degree. J Irrig Drain Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001245
  23. Tabari MMR, Yazdi A (2014) Conjunctive use of surface and groundwater with inter-basin transfer approach: case study piranshahr. Water Resour Manag 28(7):1887–1906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tabari MMR (2015a) Conjunctive Use Management under Uncertainty Conditions in Aquifer Parameters. Water Resour Manag 29(8):2967–2986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tabari MMR (2015b) Developing a Model for Optimal Use of Groundwater Based on Multi-Objective Planning, Case Study: Imam Khomeini International Airport. Journal of Water and Wastewater 25(6):88–99 (In Persian)Google Scholar
  26. Xie YL, Xia DX, Ji L, Huang GH (2018) An inexact stochastic-fuzzy optimization model for agricultural water allocation and land resources utilization management under considering effective rainfall. Ecol Indic 92:301–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yang C-C, Chang L-C, Chen C-S, Yeh M-S (2009) Multi-objective planning for conjunctive use of surface and subsurface water using genetic algorithm and dynamics programming. Water Resour Manag 23(3):417–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yousefi M, Banihabib ME, Soltani J, Roozbahani A (2018) Multi-objective particle swarm optimization model for conjuctive use of treated wastewater and groundwater. Agric Water Manag 208:224–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang C, Li M, Guo P (2017) Two-stage stochastic chance-constrained fractional programming model for optimal agricultural cultivation scale in an arid area. J Irrig Drain Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001216

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reza Sepahvand
    • 1
  • Hamid R. Safavi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Farshad Rezaei
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIsfahan University of TechnologyIsfahanIran

Personalised recommendations