Robust Parameter Set Selection for a Hydrodynamic Model Based on Multi-Site Calibration Using Multi-Objective Optimization and Minimax Regret Approach
A robust parameter set (ROPS) selection method for a hydrodynamic flow model was proposed based on the multi-site calibration by combining multi-objective optimization with the minimax regret approach (MRA). The multi-site calibration was defined by a multi-objective optimization problem for which individual objective functions were used to measure errors at each site. In the hydrodynamic model, coefficients of power functions that show the changing relationships between Manning’s roughness and discharge in each sub-reach were optimized by minimizing the residuals of multiple sites. Different combinations of weights were assigned to sites in the application of an aggregation approach to solve the multi-objective function, and the corresponding Pareto optimal parameter sets were assumed as the ROPS candidates. All performance measures to individual Pareto optimal parameter sets were calculated and the ROPS was determined using MRA. The set which has the lowest maximum regret obtained by averaging the results from calibration and validation was determined as the only ROPS. It was found that the estimated variable roughness and the corresponding computed water levels varied considerably depending on the weights assigned to sites. Using the proposed method, the task to assign proper weights on multiple sites can be easily achieved for multi-site calibration problems. This study provides a multi-criteria decision making method to choose a ROPS that has the lowest potential regret among various alternatives for hydrologic and hydraulic models.
KeywordsMinimax regret approach Pareto optimal parameter sets Robust parameter set (ROPS) Hydrodynamic model Multi-site calibration Variable roughness
This study was supported by a grant (NRF-2016R1D1A1B04931844) from the National Research Foundation of Korea, and a grant (13AWMP-B066744-01) from the Advanced Water Management Research Program by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Aksoy S, Haralick R (2000) Feature normalization and likelihood-based similarity measures for image retrieval. Pattern Recognit Lett, Special Issue on Image and Video RetrievalGoogle Scholar
- Chow VT (1959) Open Channel Hydraulics. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Coon WF (1998) Estimation of roughness coefficients for natural stream channels with vegetated banks. US Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 2441:133Google Scholar
- Cunge JA, Holly FM, Verwey A (1980) Practical aspects of computational river hydraulics. Pitman, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Doherty J (2000) Visual PEST: Model-Independent Parameter Estimation. Watermark Computing & Waterloo Hydrogeologic, WaterlooGoogle Scholar
- Holly FM, Yang JC, Schwarz P, Schaefer J, Hsu SH, Einhellig R (1990) Numerical Simulation of Unsteady Water and Sediment Movement in Multiply Connected Networks of Mobile-bed Channels. IIHR Report No. 343, Iowa Inst of Hydr Res, IowaGoogle Scholar
- Ministry of Construction and Transportation (MOCT) (2002) Han River Master Plan Report. Technical ReportGoogle Scholar
- Rouse H (1965) Critical analysis of open channel resistance. J Hydraul Div 91(HY4):1–25Google Scholar
- Stevenson WJ, Ozgur C (2007) Introduction To Management Science With Spreadsheets. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar