Abstract
Governance failures are widely recognized as a key reason why, despite sustained attention over previous decades, many longstanding water problems continue to go unsolved around the world. A major challenge in analyzing and addressing water governance problems is making “boundary judgments” in the face of complexity. Improving water governance requires accounting for a diverse and sometimes unclear set of internal and external factors that cause water problems. For example, drivers, actors, and institutions implicated may be both “internal” or “external” to a water governance system, depending on how problem boundaries are delineated. This problem confronts researchers and practitioners alike, and although recognition is growing, it remains extremely challenging to practically address. Diagnostic approaches are needed to deal with the complexity of contemporary water governance problems. In this paper, we propose a practical diagnostic approach to support structured, context-specific, critical diagnostic inquiry. We build on complementary initiatives emerging in other fields, paying particular attention to external factors that are often neglected, while being sensitive to the capacity constraints of policymakers and practitioners. The approach is flexible in allowing for either cursory or in-depth analysis as appropriate in a given situation. This allows for the identification of tangible improvements and “small wins” to improve water governance systems within a bigger-picture perspective of the diverse causes of water governance problems. Innovatively, we take a user-oriented perspective to support researchers and policymakers in practice, and break new ground in providing tractable tools for dealing with complexity in water governance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allan JA (2005) Water in the environment/socio-economic development discourse: sustainability, changing management paradigms and policy responses in a global system. Gov Oppos 40:181–199
Benson D, Rouillard JJ, Gain AK (2015) Water governance in a comparative perspective: from IWRM to a 'nexus' approach? Water Altern 8:756–773
Blomquist W, Calbick KS, Dinar A (2005) Institutional and Policy Analysis of River Basin Management. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3525. World Bank, Agriculture and Rural Development Department, Washington
Campbell H, Anderson J, Luckert M (2016) Public Policies and Canadian Ethanol Production: History and Future Prospects for an Emerging Industry. Biofuels 7:117–130
Challies E, Newig J, Lenschow A (2014) What role for social-ecological systems research in governing global teleconnections? Glob Environ Chang 27:32–40
Checkland P, Scholes J (1999) Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Wiley, West Sussex
Conca K (2006) Governing Water: Contentious Transnational Politics and Global Institution Building. Global Environmental Accord: Strategies for Sustainability and Institutional Innovation. The MIT Press, Cambridge
Cox M (2011) Advancing the diagnostic analysis of environmental problems. Int J Commons 5:346–363
de Loë RC, Patterson JJ (2017) Rethinking water governance: moving beyond water-centric perspectives in a connected and changing world. Nat Resour J 57:75–99
Franco J, Mehta L, Veldwisch GJ (2013) The global politics of water grabbing. Third World Q 34:1651–1675
Galaz V, Tallberg J, Boin A, Ituarte-Lima C, Hey C, Olsson P, Westley F (2017) Global governance dimensions of globally networked risks: the state of the art in social science research. Ris Hazards Crisis Public Policy 8:4–27
Garcia M, Portney K, Islam S (2016) A question driven socio-hydrological modeling process. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 20:73–92. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-73-2016
Garrick D, De Stefano L, Fung F, Pittock J, Schlager E, New M, Connell D (2013) Managing hydroclimatic risks in federal rivers: a diagnostic assessment. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical & Engineering Sciences 371:20120415. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0415
Hinkel J, Cox ME, Schlüter M, Binder CR, Falk T (2015) A diagnostic procedure for applying the social-ecological systems framework in diverse cases. Ecol Soc 20:32–44
Ho JC, Michalak AM (2017) Phytoplankton blooms in Lake Erie impacted by both long-term and springtime phosphorus load. J Great Lakes Res 43:221–228
Hoekstra AY (2009) Water security of nations: how international trade affects national water scarcity and dependency. In: Jones JAA, Vardanian TG, Hakopian C (eds) Threats to Global Water Security. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 27–36
Huitema D, Meijerink S (2009) Water Policy Entrepreneurs: A Research Companion to Water Transitions around the Globe. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham
Huitema D, Meijerink S (2014) The Politics of River Basin Organisations Coalitions, Institutional Design Choices and Consequences. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Ingram HM, Mann DE, Weatherford GD, Cortner HJ (1984) Guidelines for improved institutional analysis in water resources planning. Water Resour Res 20:323–334
International Joint Commission (2014) A Balanced Diet for Lake Erie: Reducing Phosphorous Loadings and Harmful Algal Blooms. International Joint Commission, Ottawa
Ison R (2010) Systems Practice: How to Act in a Climate-Change World. Springer, London
Kiser LL, Ostrom E (1982) Three worlds of action: a metatheoretical synthesis of institutional approaches. In: Strategies of Political Inquiry. Sage, Beverly Hills, pp 179–222
Lewison RL, Rudd MA, Al-Hayek W, Baldwin C, Beger M, Lieske SN, Jones C, Satumanatpan S, Junchompoo C, Hines E (2016) How the DPSIR framework can be used for structuring problems and facilitating empirical research in coastal systems. Environ Sci Pol 56:110–119
McGinnis MD (2011) Networks of adjacent action situations in polycentric governance. Policy Stud J 39:51–78
McGinnis MD, Ostrom E (2014) Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecol Soc 19:30
Medema W, McIntosh BS, Jeffrey PJ (2008) From premise to practice: a critical assessment of integrated water resources management and adaptive management approaches in the water sector. Ecol Soc 13:29–46
Michalak AM, Anderson EJ, Beletsky D, Boland S, Bosch NS, Bridgeman TB, Chaffin JD, Cho K, Confesor R, Daloglu I, Depinto JV, Evans MA, Fahnenstiel GL, He L, Ho JC, Jenkins L, Johengen TH, Kuo KC, Laporte E, Liu X, McWilliams MR, Moore MR, Posselt DJ, Richards RP, Scavia D, Steiner AL, Verhamme E, Wright DM, Zagorski MA (2013) Record-setting algal bloom in Lake Erie caused by agricultural and meteorological trends consistent with expected future conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:6448–6452
Ostrom E (2005) Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325:419–422
Ostrom E (2011) Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development framework. Policy Stud J 39:7–27
Pahl-Wostl C (2017) Governance of the water-energy-food security nexus: A multi-level coordination challenge. Environ Sci Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.017
Pahl-Wostl C, Holtz G, Kastens B, Knieper C (2010) Analyzing complex water governance regimes: the Management and Transition Framework. Environ Sci Policy 13:571–581
Pahl-Wostl C, Lebel L, Knieper C, Nikitina E (2012) From applying panaceas to mastering complexity: toward adaptive water governance in river basins. Environ Sci Policy 23:24–34
Parkes MW, Morrison KE, Bunch MJ, Hallström LK, Neudoerffer RC, Venema HD, Waltner-Toews D (2010) Towards integrated governance for water, health and social-ecological systems: the watershed governance prism. Glob Environ Change 20:693–704
Poirier B, de Loë RC (2010) Analysing water institutions in the 21st century: guidelines for water researchers and professionals. J Nat Resour Policy Res 2:229–244
Reed MG, Bruyneel S (2010) Rescaling environmental governance, rethinking the state: a three-dimensional review. Prog Hum Geogr 34:646–653
Rockström J, Falkenmark M, Folke C, Lannerstad M, Barron J, Enfors E, Gordon L, Heinke J, Hoff H, Pahl-Wostl C (2014) Water Resilience for Human Prosperity. Cambridge University Press, New York
Scavia D, Kalcic M, Logsdon Muenich R, Read JL, Aloysius N, Bertani I, Boles C, Confesor R, DePinto J, Gildow M, Martin J, Redder T, Robertson D, Sowa S, Wang YC, Yen H (2017) Multiple models guide strategies for agricultural nutrient reductions. Front Ecol Environ 15:126–132
Sojamo S, Keulertz M, Warner J, Allan A (2012) Virtual water hegemony: the role of agribusiness in global water governance. Water Int 37:169–182
Streeck W, Thelen K (eds) (2005) Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Tortajada C (2010) Water governance: a research agenda. Int J Water Resour Dev 26:309–316
Ulrich W (1993) Some difficulties of ecological thinking, considered from a critical systems perspective: a plea for critical holism. Systems. Practice 6:583–611
Ulrich W (2000) Reflective Practice in the Civil Society: the contribution of critically systemic thinking. Reflective Pract 1:247–268
United States Environmental Protection Agency GLNPO (2017) U.S. Action Plan for Lake Erie: Commitments and Strategy for Phosphorous Reduction (Draft). Environmental Protection Agency, Chicago
van Meerkerk I, Van Buuren A, Edelenbos J (2013) Water managers' boundary judgments and adaptive water governance. An analysis of the Dutch Haringvliet Sluices Case. Water Resour Manag 27:2179–2184
Wallis PJ, Ison RL (2011) Appreciating institutional complexity in water governance dynamics: a case from the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia. Water Resour Manag 25:4081–4097
Watson SB, Miller C, Arhonditsis G, Boyer GL, Carmichael W, Charlton MN, Confesor R, Depew DC, Höök TO, Ludsin SA, Matisoff G, McElmurry SP, Murray MW, Richards RP, Rao YR, Steffen MM, Wilhelm SW (2016) The re-eutrophication of Lake Erie: Harmful algal blooms and hypoxia. Harmful Algae 56:44–66
Wiek A, Larson KL (2012) Water, people, and sustainability - a systems framework for analyzing and assessing water governance regimes. Water Resour Manag 26:3153–3171
Wyborn C, Dovers S (2014) Prescribing adaptiveness in agencies of the state. Glob Environ Change 24:5–7
Young OR (2008) Institutions and environmental change: the scientific legacy of a decade of IDGEC research. In: Young OR, King LA, Schroeder H (eds) Institutions and Environmental Change: Principal Findings, Applications, and Research Frontiers. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 3–45
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (453-2014-0959). The authors would like to thank the members of the Water Policy and Governance Group who provided constructive feedback on earlier drafts, and external reviewers who helped us sharpen and clarify the arguments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Loë, R.C., Patterson, J.J. Boundary Judgments in Water Governance: Diagnosing Internal and External Factors that Matter in a Complex World. Water Resour Manage 32, 565–581 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1827-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1827-y