Advertisement

Water Resources Management

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 141–154 | Cite as

Maximizing the Firm Energy Yield Preserving Total Energy Generation Via an Optimal Reservoir Operation

  • Mehrdad Taghian
  • Iman AhmadianfarEmail author
Article

Abstract

As specified from the marketing standpoint, firm hydro-electrical energy must be available on an assured basis. To achieve the firm energy yield at maximum level, simultaneous optimization of operational variables is utilized. The variables include reservoir releases over historical stream-inflow records as well as the plant factor. Here, the plant factor denotes the percentage of day for operating a peak-time power plant at full capacity. To this end, a differential evaluation (DE) algorithm equipped with an indirect constraint handling is employed, in which an adaptive penalty system imposes the desirable reliability and preserves the total energy generation. To implement the model for a real example, a reservoir dam named Karun4, in southwest of Iran, is applied. The experimental results show the firm energy produced by the current and developed method are 49.2 and 127.5 (109 watt hours), respectively. Also, the results reveal the maximum capability of generating the firm energy yield with target reliability whereas the total energy generation is preserving.

Keywords

Differential evolution Firm energy Reliability Optimization Penalty 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the Khuzestan Water and Power Authority, Ahvaz, Iran. The authors are grateful to the staff and director of practical research department.

References

  1. Afshar A, Emami Skardia MJ, Masoumi F (2015) Optimizing water supply and hydropower reservoir operation rule curves: an imperialist competitive algorithm approach. Eng Optim 47(9):1208–1225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Afzali R, Mousavi S, Ghaheri A (2008) Reliability-based simulation-optimization model for multireservoir hydropower systems operations: Khersan experience. Water Res Plan Manag 134(1):24–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmadi M, Bozorg-Hadad O, Marino MA (2014) Extraction of flexible multi-objective real time reservoir operation rules. Water Resour Manag 28:131–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmadianfar I, Adib A, Salarijazi M (2015) Optimizing multireservoir operation: hybrid of bat algorithm and differential evolution. J Water Resour Plan Manag 142(2):05015010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ahmadianfar I, Adib A, Taghian M (2016) Optimization of fuzzified hedging rules for multipurpose and multireservoir systems. J Hydrol Eng 21(4):05016003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ahmadianfar I, Samadi-Koucheksaraee A, Bozorg-Haddad O (2017) Extracting Optimal Policies of Hydropower Multi-Reservoir Systems Utilizing Enhanced Differential Evolution Algorithm. Water Resour Manag 1–23Google Scholar
  7. Ahmadi-Najl A, Haghighi A, Vali Samani HM (2016) Simultaneous optimization of operating rules and rule curves for multireservoir systems using a self-adaptive simulation-GA model. J Water Resour Plan Manag 142(10):04016041Google Scholar
  8. Bozorg-Haddad O, Afshar A, Mariño MA (2008) Design-operation of multi-hydropower reservoirs: HBMO approach. Water Resour Manag 22(12):1709–1722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bozorg-Haddad O, Karimirad I, Seifollahi-Aghmiuni S, Loáiciga HA (2014) Development and application of the bat algorithm for optimizing the operation of reservoir systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag 141(8):04014097CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chang JF, Chen L, Chang CL (2005) Optimizing reservoir operating rule curves by genetic algorithms. Hydrol Process 19:2277–2289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chang JX, Bai T, Huang Q, Yang DW (2013) Optimization of water resource utilization by PSO-GA. Water Resour Manag 27:3525–3540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen L, Mcphee J, Yeh WW-G (2007) A diversified multi-objective GA for optimizing reservoir rule curves. Adv Water Resour 30:1082–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheng C, Wang W, Xu D (2008) Optimizing hydropower reservoir operation using hybrid genetic algorithm and chaos. Water Resour Manag 22(7):895–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davidsen C, Pereira-Cardenal S, Liu S, Mo X, Rosbjerg D, Bauer-Gottwein P (2015) Using stochastic dynamic programming to support water resource Management in the Ziya River Basin, China. Water Res Plann Manag 141(7):04014086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Erlon C, Edson L (2005) Solving the unit commitment problem of hydropower plants via Lagrangian relaxation and sequential quadratic programming. Comput Appl Math 24(3):317–341Google Scholar
  16. Eum H, Kim Y, Palmer R (2011) Optimal drought management using sampling stochastic dynamic programming with a hedging rule. Water Res Plann Manag 137(1):113–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fallah-Mehdipour E, Bozorg-Hadad O, Marino MA (2011) MOPSO algorithm and its application in multipurpose multi-reservoir operation. Hydro Inform 13:4.794–4.811Google Scholar
  18. Guo X, Hu T, Wu C, Zhang T, Lv Y (2013) Multi-objective optimization of the proposed multi-reservoir operating policy using improved NSPSO. Water Resour Manag 27:2137–2153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heidari M, Chow VT, Kokotovic PV, Meredith DD (1971) Discrete differential dynamic programming approach to water resource system optimization. Water Resour Res 7(2):273–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hidalgo I, Correia P, Arnold F, Estrocio J, de Barros R, Fernandes J, Yeh WW-G (2015) Hybrid model for short-term scheduling of hydropower systems. Water Res Plann Manag 141(3):04014062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jalali MR, Afshar A, Marino MA (2007) Multi-Colony ant algorithm for continuous multi-reservoir operation optimization problem. Water Resour Manag 21:9.1429–9.1447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ji C, Jiang Z, Sun P, Zhang Y, Wang L (2015) Research and application of multidimensional dynamic programming in Cascade reservoir based on multilayer nested structure. Water Res Plann Manag 141(7):04014090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jothiprakash V, Arunkumar R (2013) Optimization of hydropower reservoir using evolutionary algorithms coupled with chaos. Water Resour Manag 27(7):1963–1979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Karamouz M, Houck MH (1987) Comparison of stochastic and deterministic dynamic programming for reservoir operation rule generation. Water Resour Bull 23(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kjeldsen TR, Rosbjerg, D (2004) Choice of reliability, resilience and vulnerability estimators for risk assessments of water resources systems/Choix d’estimateurs de fiabilité, de résilience et de vulnérabilité pour les analyses de risque de systèmes de ressources en eau. Hydrol Sci J 49(5)Google Scholar
  26. Labadie JW (2004) Optimal operation of multi-reservoir systems: state-of-the-art review. Water Res Plan Manag 130(2):93–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Louati MH, Benabdallah S, Lebdi F, Milutin D (2011) Application of a genetic algorithm for the optimization of a complex reservoir system in Tunisia. Water Resour Manag 25(10):2387–2404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Madadgar S, Afshar A (2009) An improved continuous ant algorithm for optimization of water resources problems. Water Resour Manag 23:2119–2139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moeini R, Afshar A, Afshar MH (2011) Fuzzy rule-based model for hydropower reservoir operation. Elec Power Energ Syst 33:171–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mousavi SJ, Shourian M (2010) Capacity optimization of hydropower storage projects using particle swarm optimization algorithm. J Hydroinf 12(3):275–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Murray DM, Yakowitz S (1979) Constrained differential dynamic programming and its application to multi-reservoir control. Water Resour Res 15(5):1017–1027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Needham J, Watkins D, Lund J, Nanda K (2000) Linear programming for flood control in the Iowa and Des Moines River. Water Res Plann Manag 126(3):118–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oliveira R, Loucks D (1997) Operating rules for multi-reservoir systems. Water Resour Res 33(4):839–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ostadrahimi L, Marino MA, Afshar A (2012) Multi-reservoir operation rule: multi- swarm PSO based optimization approach. Water Resour Manag 26:407–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Randall D, Houck MH, Wright JR (1990) Drought management of existing water supply system. J Water Resour Plan Manag 116(1):1–20Google Scholar
  36. Regulwar DG, Choudhari SA, Anand Raj P (2010) Differential evolution algorithm with application to optimal operation of multipurpose reservoir. Comput Civil Eng 2(6):560–568Google Scholar
  37. Revelle C, Jores E, Kirby W (1969) The linear decision rule in reservoir management and design. 1: development of the stochastic model. Water Resour Res 5(4):767–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rodrigues D, Pereira LAM, Nakamura RYM, Costa KAP, Yang X-S, Souza AN, Papa JP (2014) A wrapper approach for feature selection and optimum-path Forest based on bat algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 41(5):2250–2258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rosenthal RE (1981) A nonlinear network algorithm for maximization of benefits in a hydroelectric power system. Oper Res 29(4):763–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schardong A, Simonovic S, Vasan A (2013) Multiobjective evolutionary approach to optimal reservoir operation. Comput Civil Eng 27(2):139–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Simonovic SP, Marino MA (1980) Reliability programming in reservoir management, 1, single multiple reservoir. Water Resour Res 16(5):844–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Storn R, Price K (1995) Differential Evolution a Simple and Efficient Adaptive Scheme for Global Optimization over Continuous Spaces. Technical Report, International Computer Science Institute, BerkleyGoogle Scholar
  43. Taghian M, Rosbjerg D, Haghighi A, Madsen H (2014) Optimization of conventional rule curves coupled with hedging rules for reservoir operation. Water Res Plan Manag 140(5):693–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tayebiyan A, Mohammed Ali TA, Ghazali AH, Malek MA (2016) Optimization of exclusive release policies for hydropower reservoir operation by using genetic algorithm. Water Resour Manag 30(3):1203–1216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vasan A, Raju KS (2007) Application of differential evolution for irrigation planning: an Indian case study. Water Resour Manag 21(8):1393–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang J, Zhang Y (2012) Short-term optimal operation of hydropower reservoirs with unit commitment and navigation. Water Res Plan Manag 138(1):3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wardlaw R, Sharif M (1999) Evaluation of genetic algorithms for optimal reservoir system operation. Water Res Plan Manag 125(1):25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wurbs RA (1993) Reservoir-system simulation and optimization models. Water Res Plan Manag 119(4):455–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yang XS, He X (2013) Bat algorithm: literature review and applications. Bio-Inspired Comput 5(3):141–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yeh WW-G (1985) Reservoir management and operation models: a state-of-the-art-review. Water Resour Res 21(12):1797–1818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yoo JH (2009) Maximization of hydropower generation through the application of a linear programming model. J Hydrol 376(1–2):182–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhao T, Cai X, Lei X, Wang H (2012) Improved dynamic programming for reservoir operation optimization with a concave objective function. Water Res Plan Manag 138(6):590–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of water resource planning, Khuzestan Water and Power AuthorityAhvazIran
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringBehbahan Khatam Alanbia University of TechnologyBehbahanIran

Personalised recommendations