Skip to main content
Log in

Indicators and a Neuro-Fuzzy Based Model for the Evaluation of Water Supply Sustainability

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the field of water management, the evaluation of sustainability has no universal methodological approach nor any consensus regarding the definitions of sustainability or sustainable development. There is an essential need therefore for a precise definition of sustainability in different water management fields. This paper deals with the sustainability of one part of urban water management, namely a water supply. A precise definition of a sustainable water supply system is given, together with a methodological framework that quantifies the degree of water supply sustainability. The proposed framework relies on the proposed quasi-strong sustainability concept, its components (dimensions), their particular relationships and corresponding indicators representing individual processes in the water supply system and utility. The processing of indicators is performed through a joint fuzzy logic/neural network (ANFIS) model. In order to evaluate each sustainability component, separate ANFIS models were created whose results were aggregated into a single result (sustainability index). According to the presented framework, sustainability is evaluated for 17 public water supply systems/utilities in Croatia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adinyira E, Oteng-Seifah S, Adjei-Kumi T (2007) A review of urban sustainability assessment methodologies. In Web Proceedings of International Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability and its Assessment, Glasgow, pp 1–10

  • Alegre H, Baptista JM, Cabrera E Jr, Cubillo F, Duarte P, Hirner W, Merkel W, Parena R (2006) Performance indicators for water supply services - 2nd Edition. IWA Publishing, London

    Google Scholar 

  • American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (1998) Sustainability criteria for water resource systems. American Society of Civil Engineers publications. Reston, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelov P, Xydeas C (2005) Fuzzy systems design: direct and indirect approaches. Soft Comput 10:836–849. doi:10.1007/s00500-005-0006-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell S, Morse S (2008) Sustainability indicators: measuring the immeasurable? - 2nd edition. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Carden K, Armitage N P (2013) Assessing urban water sustainability in South Africa - not just performance measurement. WaterSA 39(3). WISA 2012 special edition: 345-350. doi:10.4314/wsa.v39i3.1

  • Chen Z, Ngo HH, Gou W (2012) A critical review on sustainability assessment of recycled water schemes. Sci Total Environ 426:13–31. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordón O (2011) A historical review of evolutionary learning methods for Mamdani-type fuzzy rule-based systems: designing interpretable genetic fuzzy systems. Int J Approx Reason 52:894–913. doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2011.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gui-Torres D (2007) Sustainability indicators and the assessment of urban water systems: Seeking for a robust way forward. Young Scientific Workshop: Urban Water Innovation. Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

  • Juwana I, Muttil N, Perera BJC (2012) Indicator-based water sustainability assessment - a review. Sci Total Environ 438:357–371. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karleusa B, Berakovic B, Rajcic V (2010) Expert system for checking efficiency of water management planning activities. GRADEVINAR 62(1):1–11

  • Kaur A, Kaur A (2012) Comparison of Mamdani-type and Sugeno-type fuzzy inference Systems for air Conditioning System. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering (IJSCE) 2:323–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjeldsen TR, Rosbjerg D (2004) Choice of reliability, resilience and vulnerability estimators for risk assessments of water resources systems. Hydrological Sciences–Journal–des Sciences Hydrologiques 49(5):755–767. doi:10.1623/hysj.49.5.755.55136

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwen van CJ, Frijns J, Wezel van A, de Ven van FHM (2012) City blueprints: 24 indicators to assess the sustainability of the urban water cycle. Water Resour Management 26:2177–2197. doi:10.1007/s11269-012-0009-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leeuwen van K, Marques R C (2012) Current state of sustainability of urban water cycle services. Trust project publication D11.1, IWW water Centre, Germany. http://www.trust-i.net/downloads/index.php?iddesc=68. Accessed 10 June 2014

  • Loucks D (1997) Quantifying trends in system sustainability. Hydrological Sciences-Journal-des Sciences Hydrologiques 42(4):513–530. doi:10.1080/02626669709492051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palme U, Tillman AM (2009) Sustainable urban water systems in indicators: researchers recommendations versus practice in Swedish utilities. Water Policy 11:250–268. doi:10.2166/wp.2009.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popawala R, Shah N C (2011) Evaluation of sustainability index for urban water management system. In proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on environmental science and development - IPCBEE Singapore, vol.4: 267-270

  • Ross TJ (2004) Fuzzy logic with Engineering applications, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarang A, Vahedi A, Shamsai A (2007) How to quantify sustainable development: a risk-based approach to water quality management. Environ Manag 41:200–220. doi:10.1007/s00267-007-9047-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonovic S (2001) Measures of sustainability and their utilization in practical water management planning. In: Jun X (ed) Schumann a H, Acreman M C, Davis R, Marino M a, Rosbjerg D. Regional Management of Water Resources the Sixth IAHS Scientific Assembly. Maastricht, Netherlands, pp 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK (2008) An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Indic 9:189–212. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soroczynski T (2002) Integrated systems analysis and sustainable development. Rizzoli a E, Jakeman a J (Eds) in proceedings of the iEMSs 2002 Conference. Integrated Assessment and Decision Support. Lugano, Switzerland, pp 133–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Leekwijck W, Kerre EE (1999) Defuzzication: criteria and classication. Fuzzy Sets Syst 108(2):159–178. doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00337-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yannis AP, Vassilis SK (2009) Fuzzy measurement of sustainability. Nova Science Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivan Halkijevic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Halkijevic, I., Vukovic, Z. & Vouk, D. Indicators and a Neuro-Fuzzy Based Model for the Evaluation of Water Supply Sustainability. Water Resour Manage 31, 3683–3698 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1695-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1695-5

Keywords

Navigation