Advertisement

Water Resources Management

, Volume 31, Issue 6, pp 1947–1959 | Cite as

Optimum Abstraction of Groundwater for Sustaining Groundwater Level and Reducing Irrigation Cost

  • Golam Saleh Ahmed SalemEmail author
  • So Kazama
  • Daisuke Komori
  • Shamsuddin Shahid
  • Nepal C. Dey
Article

Abstract

Adaptation to increasing irrigation cost due to declination of groundwater level is a major challenge in groundwater dependent irrigated region. The objective of this study is to estimate the optimum abstraction of groundwater for irrigation for sustainable management of groundwater resources in Northwest Bangladesh. A data-driven model using a support vector machine (SVM) has been developed to estimate the optimum abstraction of groundwater for irrigation and a multiple-linear regression (MLR)-based model has been developed to estimate the reduction of the irrigation cost due to the elevation of the groundwater level. The application of the SVM model revealed that the groundwater level in the area can be kept within the suction lift of a shallow tube-well by reducing pre-monsoon groundwater-dependent irrigated agriculture by 40%. Adaptive measures, such as reducing the overuse of water for irrigation and rescheduling harvesting, can keep the minimum level of groundwater within the reach of shallow tube-wells by reducing only 10% of groundwater-based irrigated agriculture. The elevation of the groundwater level through those adaptive measures can reduce the irrigation cost by 2.07 × 103 Bangladesh Taka (BDT) per hectare in Northwest Bangladesh, where the crop production cost is increasing due to the decline of the groundwater level. It is expected that the study would help in policy planning for the sustainable management of groundwater resources in the region.

Keywords

Groundwater level Groundwater based irrigation Adaptation Northwest Bangladesh 

References

  1. Ahmad M-uD, Kirby M, Islam MS, Hossain MJ, Islam MM (2014) Groundwater use for irrigation and its productivity: status and opportunities for crop intensification for food security in Bangladesh. Water Resour Manag 28:1415–1429. doi: 10.1007/s11269-014-0560-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Faraj FAM, Tigkas D, Scholz M (2016) Irrigation efficiency improvement for sustainable agriculture in changing climate: a transboundary watershed between Iraq and Iran. Environmental Processes 3:603–616. doi: 10.1007/s40710-016-0148-0 Google Scholar
  3. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration-guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper 56, FAO, Rome 300:D05109Google Scholar
  4. Asad-uz-Zaman M, Rushton KR (2006) Improved yield from aquifers of limited saturated thickness using inverted wells. J Hydrol 326:311–324. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bangladesh Agricultural Development Corporation (2006) Minor irrigation survey report, 2005-06 irrigation wing, Bangladesh agricultural development Corporation. Ministry of Agriculture, Government of the People's Republic of Bangladesh, BangladeshGoogle Scholar
  6. Basak JK (2011) Impacts of increasing production costs on rice price: implications for food security. Unnayan Onneshan, DhakaGoogle Scholar
  7. Behzad M, Asghari K, Coppola EA Jr (2010) Comparative study of SVMs and ANNs in aquifer water level prediction. J Comput Civ Eng 24:408–413. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brouwer C, Heibloem M (1986) Irrigation water management: irrigation water needs vol 3. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  9. Chau KW, Wu CL (2010) A hybrid model coupled with singular spectrum analysis for daily rainfall prediction. J Hydroinf 12:458–473. doi: 10.2166/hydro.2010.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen XY, Chau KW, Busari AO (2015) A comparative study of population-based optimization algorithms for downstream river flow forecasting by a hybrid neural network model. Eng Appl Artif Intell 46:258–268. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2015.09.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coppola EA, Rana AJ, Poulton MM, Szidarovszky F, Uhl VW (2005) A neural network model for predicting aquifer water level elevations. Groundwater 43:231–241. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2005.0003.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cui X, Sun W, Teng J, Song H, Yao X (2015) Effect of length of the observed dataset on the calibration of a distributed hydrological model. Proceedings Intern Association of Hydrol Sci 368:305–311. doi: 10.5194/piahs-368-305-2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dey NC, Bala SK, Saiful Islam AKM, Rashid MA (2013) Sustainability of groundwater use for irrigation in northwest Bangladesh. Policy report prepared under the National Food Policy Capacity Strengthening Programme (NFPCSP), DhakaGoogle Scholar
  14. Faisal IM, Parveen S, Kabir MR (2005) Sustainable development through groundwater management: a case study on the Barind tract. Intern J Water Res Develop 21:425–435. doi: 10.1080/07900620500160800 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gholami V, Chau KW, Fadaee F, Torkaman J, Ghaffari A (2015) Modeling of groundwater level fluctuations using dendrochronology in alluvial aquifers. J Hydrol 529:1060–1069. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.09.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gunawardhana LN, Kazama S, Kawagoe S (2011) Impact of urbanization and climate change on aquifer thermal regimes. Water Resour Manag 25:3247–3276. doi: 10.1007/s11269-011-9854-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haque MAM, Jahan CS, Mazumder QH, Nawaz SMS, Mirdha GC, Mamud P, Adham MI (2012) Hydrogeological condition and assessment of groundwater resource using visual modflow modeling, Rajshahi city aquifer, Bangladesh. J Geol Soc India 79:77–84. doi: 10.1007/s12594-012-0001-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. He D, Wang E, Wang J, Robertson MJ (2017) Data requirement for effective calibration of process-based crop models. Agric For Meteorol 234:136–148. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.12.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hoque MA, Hoque MM, Ahmed KM (2007) Declining groundwater level and aquifer dewatering in Dhaka metropolitan area, Bangladesh: causes and quantification. Hydrogeol J 15:1523–1534. doi: 10.1007/s10040-007-0226-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Islam M, Kanungoe P (2005) Natural recharge to sustainable yield from the Barind aquifer: a tool in preparing effective management plan of groundwater resources. Water Sci Technol 52:251–258Google Scholar
  21. Jahani CS, Ahmed M (1997) Flow of groundwater in the Barind area, Bangladesh: implication of structural framework. Geol Soc India 50:743–752Google Scholar
  22. Kazama S (2011) Climate change impacts and responses. In: Sumi A, Mimura N, Masui T (eds) Climate change and global sustainability. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp 72–80Google Scholar
  23. Kingston DG, Todd MC, Taylor RG, Thompson JR, Arnell NW (2009) Uncertainty in the estimation of potential evapotranspiration under climate change. Geophys Res Lett 36. doi: 10.1029/2009GL040267
  24. Leng G, Tang Q, Rayburg S (2015) Climate change impacts on meteorological, agricultural and hydrological droughts in China. Glob Planet Chang 126:23–34. doi: 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2015.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li C-z, Wang H, Liu J, D-h Y, Yu F-l, Zhang L (2010) Effect of calibration data series length on performance and optimal parameters of hydrological model. Water Sci Eng 3:378–393. doi: 10.3882/j.issn.1674-2370.2010.04.002 Google Scholar
  26. Liu R, Zhang P, Wang X, Chen Y, Shen Z (2013) Assessment of effects of best management practices on agricultural non-point source pollution in Xiangxi River watershed. Agric Water Manag 117:9–18. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2012.10.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ma Y, Feng S, Song X (2015) Evaluation of optimal irrigation scheduling and groundwater recharge at representative sites in the North China plain with SWAP model and field experiments. Comput Electron Agric 116:125–136. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2015.06.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mainuddin M, Kirby M, Chowdhury RAR, Shah-Newaz SM (2015) Spatial and temporal variations of, and the impact of climate change on, the dry season crop irrigation requirements in Bangladesh. Irrig Sci 33:107–120. doi: 10.1007/s00271-014-0451-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moiwo JP, Yang Y, Li H, Han S, Yang Y (2010) Impact of water resource exploitation on the hydrology and water storage in Baiyangdian Lake. Hydrol Process 24:3026–3039. doi: 10.1002/hyp.7716 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE 50:885-900 doi:10.13031/2013.23153
  31. Mukherjee A, Saha D, Harvey CF, Taylor RG, Ahmed KM, Bhanja SN (2015) Groundwater systems of the Indian sub-continent. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 4:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2015.03.005 Google Scholar
  32. Nikolos IK, Stergiadi M, Papadopoulou MP, Karatzas GP (2008) Artificial neural networks as an alternative approach to groundwater numerical modelling and environmental design. Hydrol Process 22:3337–3348. doi: 10.1002/hyp.6916 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Raghavendra NS, Deka PC (2015) Forecasting monthly groundwater table fluctuations in coastal aquifers using support vector regression. Paper presented at the International Multi Conference on innovations in engineering and technology (IMCIET-2014)Google Scholar
  34. Shahid S (2009) Spatio-temporal variability of rainfall over Bangladesh during the time period 1969-2003 Asia-Pacific. J Atmos Sci 45:375–389Google Scholar
  35. Shahid S (2011) Impact of climate change on irrigation water demand of dry season Boro rice in northwest Bangladesh. Clim Chang 105:433–453. doi: 10.1007/s10584-010-9895-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shahid S, Hazarika MK (2010) Groundwater drought in the northwestern districts of Bangladesh. Water Resour Manag 24:1989–2006. doi: 10.1007/s11269-009-9534-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shortridge JE, Guikema SD, Zaitchik BF (2016) Machine learning methods for empirical streamflow simulation: a comparison of model accuracy, interpretability, and uncertainty in seasonal watersheds. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 20:2611. doi: 10.5194/hess-20-2611-2016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Siebert S, Burke J, Faures J-M, Frenken K, Hoogeveen J, Doll P, Portmann FT (2010) Groundwater use for irrigation- global inventory. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14:1863–1880. doi: 10.5194/hess-14-1863-2010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Starr G, Levison J (2014) Identification of crop groundwater and surface water consumption using blue and green virtual water contents at a subwatershed scale. Environ Process 1:497–515. doi: 10.1007/s40710-014-0040-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sudheer C, Shrivastava NA, Panigrahi BK, Mathur S (2011) Groundwater level forecasting using SVM-QPSO. In: Panigrahi BKSP, Das S, Satapathy SC (eds) International conference on swarm, evolutionary, and memetic computing. Springer, Berlin, pp 731–741. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-27172-4_86 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Taormina R, Chau K-W, Sethi R (2012) Artificial neural network simulation of hourly groundwater levels in a coastal aquifer system of the Venice lagoon. Eng Appl Artif Intell 25:1670–1676. doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2012.02.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tapak L, Rahmani AR, Moghimbeigi A (2014) Prediction the groundwater level of Hamadan-Bahar plain, west of Iran using support vector machines. J Res Health Sci 14:82–87Google Scholar
  43. Temesgen B, Eching S, Davidoff B, Frame K (2005) Comparison of some reference evapotranspiration equations for California. J Irrig Drain Eng 131:73–84. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2005)131:1(73) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tigkas D, Tsakiris G (2015) Early estimation of drought impacts on rainfed wheat yield in Mediterranean climate. Environ Process 2:97–114. doi: 10.1007/s40710-014-0052-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Uddameri V (2007) Using statistical and artificial neural network models to forecast potentiometric levels at a deep well in South Texas. Environ Geol 51:885–895. doi: 10.1007/s00254-006-0452-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. United States Department of Agriculture (1970) Irrigation water requirements, vol Technical Release No 21. Irrigation water Irrigation United Sates, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  47. Watto MA (2015) The economics of groundwater irrigation in the Indus Basin. Tube-well Adoption, Technical and Irrigation Water Efficiency and Optimal Allocation. The University of Western Australia, PakistanGoogle Scholar
  48. WeiB M, Menzel L (2008) A global comparison of four potential evapotranspiration equations and their relevance to stream flow modelling in semi-arid environments. Adv Geosci 18:15–23. doi: 10.5194/adgeo-18-15-2008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Willmott CJ (1982) Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 63:1309–1313. doi: 10.1175/1520-0477(1982)063<1309:SCOTEO>2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wu CL, Chau KW, Li YS (2009) Methods to improve neural network performance in daily flows prediction. J Hydrol 372:80–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.03.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zahid A, Ali MH, Hasan MR, Islam K, Ahmed N, Sultana N (2017) Assessment of the deep groundwater security in the Bengal Delta by conducting aquifer pumping tests. Water Utility Journal 15:29–43Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Golam Saleh Ahmed Salem
    • 1
    Email author
  • So Kazama
    • 2
  • Daisuke Komori
    • 1
  • Shamsuddin Shahid
    • 3
  • Nepal C. Dey
    • 4
  1. 1.Graduate School of Environmental StudiesTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan
  3. 3.Faculty of Civil EngineeringUniversiti Teknologi MalaysiaJohor BahruMalaysia
  4. 4.Research and Evaluation DivisionBangladesh Rural Advancement CommitteeDhakaBangladesh

Personalised recommendations