Advertisement

Water Resources Management

, Volume 31, Issue 4, pp 1381–1395 | Cite as

Nested Optimization Approach for the Capacity Expansion of Multiquality Water Supply Systems under Uncertainty

  • João Vieira
  • Maria Conceição Cunha
Article

Abstract

A nested optimization approach is proposed to solve capacity expansion problems of multiquality water supply systems. The problem to be solved consists of determining the infrastructure that should be built and/or rehabilitated at a specific time. This decision should be taken in a long-term planning perspective. It should consider how the operation will be performed to satisfy demand and water quality requirements by using multiple sources with different water quality at the source, take into account the temporal and spatial distribution of the water resources available and remain aware of the environmental impacts. In addition, decision processes which do not appropriately consider inherent uncertainties (e.g., hydrological, demographic, and technological uncertainties) can lead to suboptimal solutions. Here, uncertainty is handled using scenario planning with the aim of finding expansion solutions that can be expected to perform well under a set of possible future situations (or scenarios). The solution method combines simulated annealing with nonlinear programming to determine the solution to the nested optimization problem.

Keywords

Water supply Capacity expansion Nested optimization approaches 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study had the support of Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT), through the strategic project UID/MAR/04292/2013 granted to MARE.

References

  1. Afshar A, Masoumi F, Solis SS (2015) Reliability based optimum reservoir design by hybrid ACO-LP algorithm. Water Resour Manag 29(6):2045–2058. doi: 10.1007/s11269-015-0927-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buishand TA, Brandsma T (2001) Multisite simulation of daily precipitation and temperature in the Rhine basin by nearest-neighbor resampling. Water Resour Res 37(11):2761–2776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cai XM, McKinney DC, Lasdon LS (2001) Solving nonlinear water management models using a combined genetic algorithm and linear programming approach. Adv Water Resour 24(6):667–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen YW, Chang LC, Huang CW, Chu HJ (2013) Applying genetic algorithm and neural network to the conjunctive use of surface and subsurface water. Water Resour Manag 27(14):4731–4757. doi: 10.1007/s11269-013-0418-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colson B, Marcotte P, Savard G (2007) An overview of bilevel optimization. Ann Oper Res 153:235–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cunha MC (1999) On solving aquifer management problems with simulated annealing. Water Resour Manag 13(3):153–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hajiabadi R, Zarghami M (2014) Multi-objective reservoir operation with sediment flushing; case study of Sefidrud reservoir. Water Resour Manag 28(15):5357–5376. doi: 10.1007/s11269-014-0806-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hashimoto T, Stedinger JR, Loucks DP (1982) Reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability criteria for water-resource system performance evaluation. Water Resour Res 18(1):14–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Herman JD, Zeff HB, Lamontagne JR, Reed PM, Characklis GW (2016) Synthetic drought scenario generation to support bottom-up water supply vulnerability assessments. J Water Resour Plan Manag. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000701 Google Scholar
  10. Hidroprojecto and Ambio (2005) Expansion of the water supply to the Algarve – technical-economic study. Lisbon (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  11. Hsu NS, Cheng WC, Cheng WM, Wei CC, Yeh WWG (2008) Optimization and capacity expansion of a water distribution system. Adv Water Resour 31(5):776–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kang D, Lansey K (2013) Scenario-based robust optimization of regional water/wastewater infrastructure. J Water Resour Plan Manag 139(3):325–338. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000236 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kasprzyk JR, Reed PM, Characklis GW, Kirsch BR (2012) Many-objective de novo water supply portifolio under deep uncertainty. Environ Model Softw 34:87–104. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kasprzyk JR, Nataraj S, Reed PM, Lempert RJ (2013) Many objective robust decision making for complex environmental systems undergoing change. Environ Model Softw 42:55–71. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.12.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kjeldsen TR, Rosbjerg D (2004) Choice of reliability, resilience and vulnerability estimators for risk assessments of water resources systems. Hydrol Sci J 49(5):755–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lan FJ, Lin WH, Lansey K (2015) Scenario-based robust optimization of a water supply system under risk of facility failure. Environ Model Softw 67:160–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li CL, Zhou JZ, Ouyang S, Wang C, Liu Y (2015) Water resources optimal allocation based on large-scale reservoirs in the upper reaches of Yangtze River. Water Resour Manag 29(7):2171–2187. doi: 10.1007/s11269-015-0934-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Loucks DP (1997) Quantifying trends in system sustainability. Hydrol Sci J 42(4):513–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Matalas NC (2012) Comment on the announced death of stationarity. J Water Resour Plan Manag 138(4):311–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Milly PCD, Betancourt J, Falkenmark M, Hirsch RM, Kundzewicz ZW, Lettenmaier DP, Stouffer RJ (2008) Climate change - stationarity is dead: whither water management? Science 319(5863):573–574. doi: 10.1126/science.1151915 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mulvey JM, Vanderbei RJ, Zenios SA (1995) Robust optimization of large-scale systems. Oper Res 43(2):264–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ray PA, Watkins DW Jr, Vogel RM, Kirshen PH (2014) Performance-based evaluation of an improved robust optimization formulation. J Water Resour Plan Manag 140(6):04014006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reis LFR, Walters GA, Savic D, Chaudhry FH (2005) Multi-reservoir operation planning using hybrid genetic algorithm and linear programming (GA-LP): an alternative stochastic approach. Water Resour Manag 19(6):831–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Reis LFR, Bessler FT, Walters GA, Savic D (2006) Water supply reservoir operation by combined genetic algorithm-linear programming (GA-LP) approach. Water Resour Manag 20(2):227–255. doi: 10.1007/s11269-006-8049-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ricciardi KL, Pinder GF, Karatzas GP (2007) Efficient groundwater remediation system design subject to uncertainty using robust optimization. J Water Resour Plan Manag 133(3):253–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ricciardi KL, Pinder GF, Karatzas GP (2009) Efficient groundwater remediation system designs with flow and concentration constraints subject to uncertainty. J Water Resour Plan Manag 135(2):128–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rosenberg DE, Lund JR (2009) Modeling integrated decisions for a municipal water system with recourse and uncertainties: Amman, Jordan. Water Resour Manag 23(1):85–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Salas JD, Rajagopalan B, Saito L, Brown C (2012) Special section on climate change and water resources: climate nonstationarity and water resources management. J Water Resour Plan Manag 138(5):385–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sandoval-Solis S, McKinney DC, Loucks DP (2011) Sustainability index for water resources planning and management. J Water Resour Plan Manag 137(5):381–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schmitz F, Wöhling T, de Paly M, Schütze N (2007) GAIN–P: a new strategy to increase furrow irrigation efficiency. Arab J Sci Eng 32(1C):103–114Google Scholar
  31. Sinha A, Malo P, Deb K (2013a) Efficient evolutionary algorithm for single-objective bilevel optimization. arXiv:1303.3901v2 [cs.NE]Google Scholar
  32. Sinha A, Malo P, Frantsev A, Deb K (2013b) Multi-objective Stackelberg game between a regulating authority and a mining company: a case study in environmental economics. In: 2013 I.E. congress on evolutionary computation (CEC-2013), Cancun, pp 478–485Google Scholar
  33. Stackelberg H (1952) The theory of market economy. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  34. Tseng HW, Gan TY, Yu PS (2015) Composite drought indices of monotonic behaviour for assessing potential impact of climate change to a water resources system. Water Resour Manag 29(7):2341–2359. doi: 10.1007/s11269-015-0945-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vicente LN, Calamai PH (1994) Bilevel and multilevel programming: a bibliography review. J Glob Optim 5(3):291–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vieira J (2014) Decision models for the management of multisource water supply systems. PhD Thesis, University of Coimbra (in Portuguese)Google Scholar
  37. Vieira J, Cunha MC (2011) A two steps solution approach to solving large nonlinear models: application to a problem of conjunctive use. Water Sci Technol 64(12):2492–2499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Vieira J, Cunha MC, Nunes LM, Monteiro JP, Ribeiro L, Stigter TY, Nascimento J, Lucas H (2011) Optimization of the operation of large-scale multisource water-supply systems. J Water Resour Plan Manag 137(2):150–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vogel RM, Shallcross AL (1996) The moving blocks bootstrap versus parametric time series models. Water Resour Res 32(6):1875–1882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Watkins DW, McKinney DC (1999) Screening water supply options for the Edwards aquifer region in Central Texas. J Water Resour Plan Manag 125(1):14–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yang SL, Sun YH, Yeh WWG (2000) Optimization of regional water distribution system with blending requirements. J Water Resour Plan Manag 126(4):229–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zongxue X, Jinno K, Kawamura A, Takesaki S, Ito K (1998) Performance risk analysis for Fukuoka water supply system. Water Resour Manag 12(1):13–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MARE – Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal

Personalised recommendations