Runoff prediction in flood forecasting depends on the use of hydrological simulation models and on the input of accurate precipitation forecasts. Reliability of predictions thus obtained hinges on proper calibration of the model. Moreover, when the model is intended to be used systematically in operational forecasting of streamflows, the calibration process must take into account the variation of the model parameters over time, namely in response to changing weather and hydrological conditions in the basin. The goal of the study was to build a process to adjust, on a daily basis, the simulation model parameters to the current hydrological conditions of the river basin, in order for the model to be run operationally for prediction of the streamflow for the next 10-days period, and, thereby, to forecast the occurrence of flood events. Towards this end, hydrological simulations using the HEC-HMS model were performed, using a 3 h period time step. The present communication focuses on the hydrological model calibration and verification processes and on the evaluation of forecasts’ accuracy. The procedure was applied to a part of the largest (full) Portuguese river basin, the Mondego river basin, corresponding to the Aguieira dam section watershed, which comprises an area of 3070 km2. Four wet periods, associated with the occurrence of flooding, were selected for the calibration and verification of the model, by adjustment of the model parameters. The results of the study aim to define the optimal calibration parameters values to model the observed streamflow for various hydro-meteorological states, thus enabling adequate prediction of flow in flooding situations and proper application of the model in operational flood forecasting.
Hydrologic modelling Calibration and verification Accuracy Runoff Flood forecasting
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The first author is indebted to the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (PhD grant reference SFRH/BD/65905/2009, supported by “Programa Operacional Potencial Humano do Fundo Social Europeu” (POPH/FSE) funding). Moreover, the authors also thank EDP-Produção for providing the data used in this study, and Pedro Pinto de Sousa for linguistic revision.
Abbaspour KC (2005) Calibration of Hydrologic Models: When is a Model Calibrated? In: Zerger A and Argent RM (eds) MODSIM 2005 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, pp. 2249–2455. ISBN: 0–9758400–2-9Google Scholar
Boyle DP, Gupta H, Sorooshian S (2000) Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods. Water Resour Res 36(12):3663–3674. doi:10.1029/2000WR900207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunderlik J, Simonovic SP (2004) Calibration, verification and sensitivity analysis of the HEC-HMS hydrologic model. Water Resources Research Report, Book 11. ISBN (Online): 978–0–7714-2627-8. http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/wrrr/11. Accessed 20 February 2015
Cuo L, Pagano T, Wang Q (2011) Review of quantitative precipitation forecasts and their use in short- to medium-range streamflow forecasting. J Hydrometeorol 12:713–728. doi:10.1175/2011JHM1347.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Datorani MT, Khodaparast R, Talebi A, Vafakhah M, Dashti J (2011) Determination of the ability of HEC-HMS model components in rainfall-runoff simulation. Res J Environ Sci 5(10):790–797. doi:10.3923/rjes.2011.790.797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deckers D, Booij M, Rientjes T, Krol M (2010) Catchment variability and parameter estimation in multi-objective regionalisation of a rainfall–runoff model. Water Resour Manag 24(14):3961–3985. doi:10.1007/s11269-010-9642-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta H, Sorooshian S (1998) Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: multiple and noncommensurable measures of information. Water Resour Res 34(4):751–763. doi:10.1029/97WR03495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50 (3): 885–900. http://handle.nal.usda.gov/10113/9298. Accessed 29 January 2015
Nigussie TA, Altunkaynak A (2016) Assessing the hydrological response of Ayamama watershed from urbanization predicted under various Landuse policy scenarios. Water Resour Manag 30:3427–3441. doi:10.1007/s11269-016-1360-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reshma T, Reddy KV, Pratap D, Ahmedi M, Agilan V (2015) Optimization of calibration parameters for an event based watershed model using genetic algorithm. Water Resour Manag 29:4589–4606. doi:10.1007/s11269-015-1077-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter A, Muñoz-Carpena R, (2013) Performance evaluation of hydrological models: Statistical significance for reducing subjectivity in goodness-of-fit assessments. J Hydrol 480:33–45Google Scholar
Shahid MA, Boccardo P, Usman M, Albanese A, Qamar MU (2016) Predicting peak flows in real time through event based hydrologic modeling for a trans-Boundary River catchment. Water Resour Manag:1–18. doi:10.1007/s11269-016-1435-2
Werner M, Cranston M, Harrison T, Whitfield D, Schellekens J (2009) Recent developments in operational flood forecasting in England, Wales and Scotland. Meteorol Appl 16:13–22. doi:10.1002/met.124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WMO (2011) Manual on Flood Forecasting and Warning. World Meteorological Organization publication, WMO-No.1072, ISBN 978–92–63-11072-5.Google Scholar