A Sub-Catchment Based Approach for Modelling Nutrient Dynamics and Transport at a River Basin Scale
- 260 Downloads
The prediction of nutrient pollution at realistic details is difficult due to lack of proper description of inherent processes in modelling tools. To overcome that this study has adopted a process based approach to build a semi-distributed model to simulate nutrient pollution in changing environment. The model was built to describe: (1) nutrient generation process in the catchment with consideration of different aspects of external and internal sources, (2) nutrient release from surface to the waterways via runoff and soil erosion, and (3) in-stream transport and chemical reaction process. The key novelty of this research is the linking of the nutrient generation process with transport mechanism for modelling nutrient dynamics at a basin scale. A flow capacity based approach was introduced to determine nutrient export from catchment to the waterways, which was useful to achieve the high resolution outputs from the model. The model performed reasonably well to represent the behaviour of nutrient in high flow events as well as in seasonal flow in two catchments located in distinct hydro-climatic regions. The study has shown that the nutrient model is suitable for predicting actual nutrient pollution in rivers for both high flow and seasonal flow under different hydro-climatic conditions. By simulating organic and inorganic nutrients separately, the model allows to estimate river water quality status in detail.
KeywordsNutrient pollution Process-based modelling Soil erosion Catchment and in-stream process River basin
Authors greatly acknowledge the Civil Engineering Research Institute of Hokkaido and Kitami Institute of Technology, Japan and Victorian Water Resources Database for data and several internal and external reviewers for their contribution to improve the manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The study was undertaken as part of a PhD research project at Monash University, Australia and partially funded by the Asia Pacific Network for Global Change Research.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bhattarai R, Dutta D (2007) Estimation of soil erosion and sediment yield using GIS at catchment scale. Water Resources Management Journal 21:1635–1647Google Scholar
- Chapra SC (1997) Surface-water quality modelling. WCB McGraw Hill, USAGoogle Scholar
- Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays LW (1988) Applied hydrology, McGrawhill, USAGoogle Scholar
- Cook FJ, Jordan PW, Waters DK, Rahman JM (2009) WaterCAST – Whole of catchment hydrology model an overview. MODSIM Congress, CairnsGoogle Scholar
- Croke J (2002) Managing phosphorus in catchment, River Landscapes, Fact Sheet 11, Land & Water, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- Croke J, Young B (2001) River contaminants: what are river contaminants and how can we effectively manage them for riverine and ecosystem protection? “RipRap”, River and Riparian Lands Management Newsletter, Land & Water Australia, Canberra, 20:1–6Google Scholar
- DHI (2002) MIKE11: A modelling system for rivers and channels, Reference manual, DHI Water & Environment, Hørsholm, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
- Drysdale G (1998) Dairy farm performance analysis 1996–97. Annual Report, DNRE, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
- Finkele K, Mills GA, Beard G, Jones DA (2006) National gridded drought factors and comparison of two soil moisture deficit formulations used in prediction of forest fire danger index in Australia. Aust Meteorol Mag 55:183–197Google Scholar
- Fischer HB, List EJ, Koh RCY, Imberger J, Brooks NH (1979) Mixing in inland and coastal water. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Hansen S, Jensen HE, Nielson NE, Svendson H (1990) DAISY. A soil plant system model. Danish simulation model for transformation and transport of energy and matter in the soil plant atmosphere system. NPO-Research Report A 10, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
- Kouwen N (1999) WATFLOOD/SPL8 Flood Forecasting System. Documentation and User Manual. Civil Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- Lunn RJ, Adams R, Mackay R, Dunn SM (1996) Development and application of a nitrogen modelling system for large catchments. J Hydrol 174:285–304Google Scholar
- LVWSB (1986) The Latrobe River Basin, Water Resources and Aquatic Environment, a review, The Latrobe Valley Water and Sewerage Board, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- Perraud JM, Seaton SP, Rahman JM, Davis GP, Argent RM, Podger GM (2005) The architecture of the E2 catchment modelling framework, MODSIM2005, 690–696Google Scholar
- Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, Porter JP (1991) RUSLE, revised universal soil loss equation. J Soil Water Conserv 46(1):30–33Google Scholar
- Renard KG, Foster GR, Weesies GA, McCool DK, Yoder DC (1996) Predicting soil erosion by water: a guide to conservation planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural handbook, 703Google Scholar
- Tzoraki OA, Dörflinger G, Kathijotes N, Kontou A (2014) Nutrient-based ecological consider-ation of a temporary river catchment affected by a reservoir operation to facilitate efficient management. Water Sci Technol 69(4):847–854Google Scholar
- Weischmer WH, Smith DD (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses - a guide to conservation planning, USDA. Agricultural Handbook, p 282Google Scholar
- Whitehead PG, Wilson EJ, Butterfield D (1998) A semi-distributed integrated nitrogen model for multiple source assessment in catchment, Part I. model structure and process equations. The Science of the Total Environment. 210/211:547–558Google Scholar
- Whitehead PG, Wilson EJ, Butterfield D, Seed K (1998) A semi-distributed integrated flow and nitrogen model for multiple source assessment in catchments (INCA): Part II- application to large river basins in South Wales and Eastern England. The Science of the Total Environment, 210/211:559–83Google Scholar
- Williams JR (1975) Sediment-yield prediction with universal equation using runoff energy factor. present and prospective technology for predicting sediment yields and sources, ARS-S-40. USDA. Agric Res Serv 244–252Google Scholar
- Yoshikawa Y, Yasuda H, Watanabe Y, Nakayama K, Dutta D (2006) Sediment transport during flood and application of distributed hydrological model. APHWR conference. (ST1-01-A06-119-), 1–8Google Scholar