Excess Stormwater Quantification in Ungauged Watersheds Using an Event-Based Modified NRCS Model
- 326 Downloads
Quantifying runoff from a storm event is a crucial part of rainfall-runoff model development. The objective of this study is to illustrate inconsistencies in the initial abstraction (I a) and curve number (CN) in the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) model for ungauged steep slope watersheds. Five alternatives to the NRCS model were employed to estimate stormwater runoff in 39 forest-dominated mountainous watersheds. The change to the parameterization (slope-adjusted CN and I a) leads to more efficient modified NRCS models. The model evaluations based on root mean square error (RMSE), Nash-Sutcliffe coefficient E, coefficient of determination (R 2 ), and percent bias (PB) indicated that our proposed model with modified I a, consistently performed better than the other four models and the original NRCS model, in reproducing the runoff. In addition to the quantitative statistical accuracy measures, the proposed I a modification in the NRCS model showed very encouraging results in the scatter plots of the combined 1799 storm events, compared to other alternatives. This study’s findings support modifications to the CN and the I a in the NRCS model for steep slope ungauged watersheds and suggest additional changes for more accurate runoff estimations.
KeywordsCurve number Initial abstraction Maximum potential retention NRCS model
This research was supported by a grant from the Construction Technology Innovation Program (11CTIPC06-Development of Korean Advanced Technology for Hydrologic Analysis) funded by the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport (MLIT) of Korea. Special thanks to the Hydrological Survey Center (HSC) of Korea for providing measured data of streamflow.
- Hawkins RH, Ward TJ, Woodward DE, Van Mullem JA (2009) Curve number hydrology-state of practice. The ASCE/EWRI publication, ISBN 978-0-7844-7257-6Google Scholar
- Kim NW, Lee JW, Lee J, Lee JE (2010) SWAT application to estimate design runoff curve number for South Korean conditions. Hydrol Process 24(15):2156–2170Google Scholar
- Michel C, Andreassian V, Perrin C (2005) Soil Conservation Service curve number method: how to mend a wrong soil moisture accounting procedure? Water Resour Res 41(2):W02011Google Scholar
- Mishra SK, Singh VP (2003) Soil Conservation Service curve number (SCS-CN) methodology. Kluwer Academic Dordrecht, The Netherlands, ISBN 978-94-017-0147-1Google Scholar
- Sharpley AN, Williams JR (1990) EPIC-Erosion/Productivity Impact Calculator: 1. Model documentation. US Department of Agriculture Tech. Bull., No. 1768Google Scholar
- Shaw SB, Walter MT (2009) Improving runoff risk estimates: formulating runoff as a bivariate process using the SCS curve number method. Water Resour Res 45(3):W03404Google Scholar
- USDA-FS (US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service) (1968) Rainfall interception by annual grass and chaparral. Berkeley, CA: Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service Research Paper PSW-48Google Scholar
- USDA-NRCS (US Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service) (2004) ‘Hydrology’ National Engineering Handbook, Supplement A, Section 4. Soil Conservation Service, USDA, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Woodward DE, Hawkins RH, Jiang R, Hjelmfelt Jr AT, Van Mullem JA, Quan DQ (2003) Runoff curve number model: examination of the initial abstraction ratio, World Water & Environ. Resour. Congress and Related Symposia, EWRI, ASCE, 23–26 June, 2003, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USAGoogle Scholar