Water Resources Management

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 133–148 | Cite as

Evaluation of the Effects of Climate Change on Groundwater Recharge Using a Hybrid Method

  • Mustafa Goodarzi
  • Jahangir Abedi-Koupai
  • Manouchehr Heidarpour
  • Hamid Reza Safavi


In this study, a new framework was developed for the estimation of groundwater recharge based on a hybrid method. In this regard, the homogeneous recharge zones were determined by the analytical hierarchy process (AHP). The recharge rates in these zones were calculated using the Thornthwaite and Mather’s method. These zones and their recharge rates were entered into the MODFLOW model. Next, the modeling processes, modification of recharge, and calibration of empirical models were interactively continued in the MODFLOW. This way, one of the most important disadvantages of conventional empirical models, i.e., ignoring the physical properties of the aquifer, was resolved by considering the main parameters such as soil properties, unsaturated thickness, land cover, irrigation, and precipitation in the resulting nonlinear equations. The low root mean square error values (less than 5.2) for all equations and high values of the coefficient of determinations indicated the accuracy and reliability of the models. The results of this hybrid method were a series of independent, cost-effective, rapid, and simple to use empirical equations for recharge estimation. As an example for the application of this method, the effects of climate change on groundwater recharge were evaluated in the study area. The obtained results showed that climate change would reduce the recharge rates of the homogeneous zones differently. Moreover, the recharge rate had a general decreasing trend in all regions. Overall, the total annual recharge rate would decrease in the plain. This reduction, especially in the west of the plain which is one of the most important sources of recharge supply, is considerable and will turn the entire plain vulnerable. In general, little reduction in rainfall or increase in temperature would have significant effects on groundwater recharge in the region. Therefore, due to the high dependence of this plain on groundwater resources, special planning is required for the exploitation of groundwater resources in the region.


Groundwater recharge Hybrid methods Climate change AHP MODFLOW 


  1. Ababei B, Sohrabi T (2009) Assessing the performance of SWAT model in Zayandeh Rud watershed. J Soil Water Conserv 16(3):41–58Google Scholar
  2. Ali R, McFarlane D, Varma S, Dawes W, Emelyanova I, Hodgson G, Charles S (2012) Potential climate change impacts on groundwater resources of south-western Australia. J Hydrol 475:456–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allen DM, Cannon AJ, Toews MW, Scibek J (2010) Variability in simulated recharge using different GCMs. Water Resour Res 46:W00F03Google Scholar
  4. Alley WM, Reilly TE, Franke OL (1999) Sustainability of Ground-Water Resources. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1186Google Scholar
  5. Barron OV, Crosbie RS, Charles SP et al (2011) Climate change impact on groundwater resources in Australia Waterlines report. National Water Commission, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  6. Castaño S, Sanz D, Gómez AJJ (2013) Sensitivity of a groundwater flow model to both climatic variations and management scenarios in a semi-arid region of SE Spain. Water Resour Manag 27:2089–2101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crosbie RS, McCallum JL, Walker GR, Chiew FHS (2012) Episodic recharge and climate change in the Murray-Darling basin, Australia. Hydrogeol J 20:245–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crosbie RS, Scanlon BR, Mpelasoka FS, Reedy RC, Gates JB, Zhang L (2013) Potential climate change effects on groundwater recharge in the High Plains Aquifer, USA. Water Resour Res: 49Google Scholar
  9. Dams J, Salvadore E, Van Dael T, Ntegeka V, Willems P, Batelaan O (2011) Spatio-temporal impact of climate change on the groundwater system. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 8:10195–10223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dawes W, Ali R, Varma S, Emelyanova I, Hodgson G, McFarlane D (2012) Modelling the effects of climate and land cover change on groundwater recharge in south-west Western Australia. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 9:6063–6099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dourado ND, van Lier QJ, Metselaar K, Reichardt K, Nielsen RD (2010) General procedure to initialize the cyclic soil water balance by the Thornthwaite and Mather method. Sci Agric (Piracicaba, Braz) 67(1):87–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gohari A, Eslamian S, Abedi-Koupaei J, Massah Bavani A, Wang D, Madani K (2013) Climate change impacts on crop production in Iran’s Zayandeh-Rud River Basin. Sci Total Environ 442:405–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harbaugh AW (2005) MODFLOW-2005, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model - the ground-water flow process: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 6-A16Google Scholar
  14. Healy RW (2010) Estimating groundwater recharge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hetzel F, Vaessen V, Himmelsbach T, Struckmeier W, Villholth K (2008) Groundwater and Climate Change: Challenges and Possibilities. BMZ Groundwater Policy Paper, 15 S., BMZ BonnGoogle Scholar
  16. Jackson RC, Meister R, Prudhomme C (2011) Modelling the effects of climate change and its uncertainty on UK Chalk groundwater resources from an ensemble of global climate model projections. J Hydrol 399:12–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jiang Y, Liu C, Li X (2015) Hydrological impacts of climate change simulated by HIMS models in the Luanhe River Basin, North China. Water Resour Manag 29:1365–1384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jyrkama MI, Sykes JF (2007) The impact of climate change on spatially varying groundwater recharge in the Grand River watershed (Ontario). J Hydrol 338(3–4):237–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kingston DG, Taylor RG (2010) Sources of uncertainty in climate change impacts on river discharge and groundwater in a headwater catchment of the Upper Nile Basin, Uganda. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14:1297–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kumar CP (2012) Climate change and its impact on groundwater resources. Int J Eng Sci 1:43–60Google Scholar
  21. Musekiwa C, Majola K (2013) Groundwater vulnerability Map for south africa. S Afr J Geomatics 2(2):152–163Google Scholar
  22. Nyagwambo NL (2006) Groundwater Recharge Estimation and Water Resources Assessment in a Tropical Crystalline Basement Aquifer. Ph.d dissertation, in Delft University of Technology, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  23. Nyenje PM, Batelaan O (2009) Estimating the effects of climate change on groundwater recharge and baseflow in the upper Ssezibwa catchment, Uganda. Hydrol Sci J 54(4):713–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rushton KR (2003) Groundwater Hydrology: Conceptual and Computational Models. WileyGoogle Scholar
  25. Safavi HR, Bahreini GR (2009) Conjunctive simulation of surface water and groundwater resources under uncertaint. Iran J Sci Technol Trans B Eng 33:79–94Google Scholar
  26. Satty T (1980) The Analytical Hierarchy Process, Planning Priority, Resource Allocation. TWS Publications. USA. pp 287Google Scholar
  27. Scanlon BR, Healy RW, Cook PG (2002) Choosing appropriate techniques for quantifying groundwater recharge. Hydrogeol J 10:18–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thornthwaite CW, Mather Jr (1955) The Water Balance. Laboratory of Climatology, CentertonGoogle Scholar
  29. Tirkey P, Gorai AK, Iqbal J (2013) AHP-GIS based DRASTIC model for groundwater vulnerability to pollution assessment: a case study of hazaribag district, Jharkhand, India. Int J Environ Prot 2:20–31Google Scholar
  30. Toews MW, Allen DM (2009) Evaluating different GCMs for predicting spatial recharge in an irrigated arid region. J Hydrol 374:265–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Woldeamlak ST, Batelaan O, Smedt F (2007) Effects of climate change on the groundwater system in the Grote-Nete catchment, Belgium. Hydrogeol J 15:891–901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Xie Z, Di Z, Luo Z, Qian MA (2012) A quasi-three-dimensional variably saturated groundwater flow model for climate modeling. J Hydrometeorol 13:27–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Xu CY (2000) Modelling the effects of climate change on water resources in central Sweden. Water Resour Manag 14:177–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zagonari F (2010) Sustainable, just, equal, and optimal groundwater management strategies to cope with climate change: insights from Brazil. Water Resour Manag 24:3731–3756CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mustafa Goodarzi
    • 1
  • Jahangir Abedi-Koupai
    • 1
  • Manouchehr Heidarpour
    • 1
  • Hamid Reza Safavi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Water Engineering, College of AgricultureIsfahan University of TechnologyIsfahanIran
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringIsfahan University of technologyIsfahanIran

Personalised recommendations