Comparing Public Perceptions of Alternative Water Sources for Potable Use: The Case of Rainwater, Stormwater, Desalinated Water, and Recycled Water
- 776 Downloads
This research investigated how people’s perceptions of alternative water sources compare with their perceptions of other technologies, and identified significant predictors of comfort with different alternative water sources. We drew on data from four questionnaire survey studies with a total sample of more than 1200 Australian participants. Relative levels of comfort with the alternative water sources was consistent across the four studies: comfort was always highest for drinking rainwater and lowest for drinking recycled water, with comfort with drinking treated stormwater and desalinated water sitting between these two. Although comfort with drinking recycled water was always lowest of the four alternative water sources, participants were significantly more comfortable with drinking recycled water than they were with nuclear energy, or with using genetically modified plants and animals for food. In general, demographic variables were less important predictors of comfort with alternative water sources than were psychological variables; only age and gender emerged as relatively consistent predictors for recycled water, stormwater, and desalinated water, with older participants and males more comfortable with drinking these water sources. Of the psychological variables, participants’ comfort with technology in general, trust in science and trust in government emerged consistently as significant positive predictors of comfort with drinking recycled water, stormwater, and desalinated water.
KeywordsPublic perceptions Rainwater Stormwater Desalinated water Recycled water
This research was supported by the Urban Water Security Research Alliance and through funding from the Australian Research Council grant FT100100704.
Conflict of Interest
No conflict of interest.
- Bruce G, Critchey C (2012) The Swinburne national technology and society monitor. Swinburne University of Technology, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
- Dolnicar S, Hurlimann A (2010) Desalinated versus recycled water: what does the public think? In: Escobar IC, Schafer A (eds) Sustainable water for the future: water recycling versus desalination. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Hurlimann A, McKay J (2004) Attitudes to reclaimed water for domestic use: Part 2. Trust Water 31:40–45Google Scholar
- King T, Murphy K (2009) Procedural justice and Australian environment: the case of the Wonthaggi water desalination plant. Public Policy 4:105–121Google Scholar
- King TJ, Ooi D, Cary J, Fisher A, Schibeci R, Murphy K, O’Toole K, Mearns M, Donaldson JA (2012) Public perceptions of, and responses to, desalination in Australia: A report on findings. Working Papers Series Two. Geelong: Alfred Deakin Research InstituteGoogle Scholar
- Marks JS (2004) Advancing community acceptance of reclaimed water. Water (August):46–51Google Scholar
- Marks JS, Martin B, Zadoroznyj M (2006) Acceptance of water recycling in Australia: national baseline data. Water 33(2):151–157Google Scholar
- Po M, Kaercher JD, Nancarrow BE (2003) Literature review of factors influencing public perceptions of water reuse. In Water C. L. A. (ed) Technical Report 54/03Google Scholar