Water Resources Management

, Volume 29, Issue 12, pp 4501–4518 | Cite as

Comparing Public Perceptions of Alternative Water Sources for Potable Use: The Case of Rainwater, Stormwater, Desalinated Water, and Recycled Water

  • Kelly S. Fielding
  • John Gardner
  • Zoe Leviston
  • Jennifer Price
Article

Abstract

This research investigated how people’s perceptions of alternative water sources compare with their perceptions of other technologies, and identified significant predictors of comfort with different alternative water sources. We drew on data from four questionnaire survey studies with a total sample of more than 1200 Australian participants. Relative levels of comfort with the alternative water sources was consistent across the four studies: comfort was always highest for drinking rainwater and lowest for drinking recycled water, with comfort with drinking treated stormwater and desalinated water sitting between these two. Although comfort with drinking recycled water was always lowest of the four alternative water sources, participants were significantly more comfortable with drinking recycled water than they were with nuclear energy, or with using genetically modified plants and animals for food. In general, demographic variables were less important predictors of comfort with alternative water sources than were psychological variables; only age and gender emerged as relatively consistent predictors for recycled water, stormwater, and desalinated water, with older participants and males more comfortable with drinking these water sources. Of the psychological variables, participants’ comfort with technology in general, trust in science and trust in government emerged consistently as significant positive predictors of comfort with drinking recycled water, stormwater, and desalinated water.

Keywords

Public perceptions Rainwater Stormwater Desalinated water Recycled water 

References

  1. Arnell NW (2004) Climate change and global water resources: SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios. Glob Environ Chang 14:31–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bagget S, Jeffrey P, Jefferson B (2006) Risk perception in participatory planning for water reuse. Desalination 187:149–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bruce G, Critchey C (2012) The Swinburne national technology and society monitor. Swinburne University of Technology, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  4. Dolnicar S, Hurlimann A (2010) Desalinated versus recycled water: what does the public think? In: Escobar IC, Schafer A (eds) Sustainable water for the future: water recycling versus desalination. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  5. Dolnicar S, Saunder C (2006) Recycled water for consumer markets - a marketing research review and agenda. Desalination 187:203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dolnicar S, Schäfer A (2009) Desalinated versus recycled water: public perceptions and profiles of accepters. J Environ Manag 90:888–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dolnicar S, Hurlimann A, Nghiem LD (2010) The effect of information on public acceptance - the case of water from alternative sources. J Environ Manag 91:1288–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dolnicar S, Hurlimann A, Grun B (2011) What affects public acceptance of recycled and desalinated water? Water Res 45:933–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dolnicar S, Hurlimann A, Grün B (2014) Branding water. Water Res 57:325–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dunlap RE, Xiao C, McCright AM (2001) Politics and environment in America: partisan and ideological cleavages in public support for environmentalism. Environ Polit 10:23–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eiser JR, Miles S, Frewer LJ (2002) Trust, perceived risk, and attitudes toward food technologies. J Appl Soc Psychol 32:2423–2433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fielding KS, Roiko AH (2014) Providing information promotes greater public support for potable recycled water. Water Res 61:86–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gardiner A (2010) Do rainwater tanks herald a cultural change in household water use? Aust J Environ Manag 17:100–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gleik PH (2000) The changing water paradigm: a look at twenty-first century water resources development. Water Int 25:127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Higgins J, Warnken J, Sherman PP, Teasdale PR (2002) Surveys of users and providers of recycled water: quality concerns and directions for applied research. Water Res 36:5045–5056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hurlimann AC (2007) Is recycled water use risky? An Urban Australian community’s perspective. Environmentalist 27:83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hurlimann A, Dolnicar S (2009) When public opposition defeats alternative water projects - The case of Toowoomba Australia. Water Res 44(1):287–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hurlimann A, McKay J (2004) Attitudes to reclaimed water for domestic use: Part 2. Trust Water 31:40–45Google Scholar
  19. Hurlimann A, Hemphill E, McKay J, Geursen G (2008) Establishing components of community satisfaction with recycled water use through a structural equation model. J Environ Manag 88:1221–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hwang AH-S, Valeo C, Draper D (2006) Public perceptions and attitudes towards stormwater recycling for irrigation. Can Water Res J 31:185–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones AQ, Dewey CE, Doré K, Majowicz SE, McEwen SA, Waltner-Toews D, Henson SJ, Matthew E (2005) Public perception of drinking water from private water supplies: focus group analyses. BMC Public Health 5:129–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kahan DM, Braman D, Slovic P, Gastil J, Cohen G (2009) Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology. Nat Nanotechnol 4:87–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kahan DM, Jenkins-Smith H, Braman D (2011) Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. J Risk Res 14:147–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. King T, Murphy K (2009) Procedural justice and Australian environment: the case of the Wonthaggi water desalination plant. Public Policy 4:105–121Google Scholar
  25. King TJ, Ooi D, Cary J, Fisher A, Schibeci R, Murphy K, O’Toole K, Mearns M, Donaldson JA (2012) Public perceptions of, and responses to, desalination in Australia: A report on findings. Working Papers Series Two. Geelong: Alfred Deakin Research InstituteGoogle Scholar
  26. Leonard R, Mankad A, Alexander K (2015a) Predicting support and likleihood of protest in relation to the use of treated stormwater with managed aquifer recharge for potable and non-potable purposes. J Clean Prod. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.051 Google Scholar
  27. Leonard R, Walton A, Farbotko C (2015b) Using the concept of common pool resources to understand community perceptions of diverse water sources in Adelaide, South Australia. Water Resour Manag 29:1697–1711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lowenstein GF, Weber EU, Hsee CK, Welch N (2001) Risk as feelings. Psychol Bull 127:267–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mankad A, Chong MN, Gardner T, Sharma A (2012) Examining biophysical and socio-demographic factors across mandated tank users in urban Australia: a linking step towards achieving best practices. Water Resour Manag 26:1983–1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mankad A, Walton A, Alexander K (2015) Key dimensions of public acceptance for managed aquifer recharge of urban stormwater. J Clean Prod 89:214–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marks JS (2004) Advancing community acceptance of reclaimed water. Water (August):46–51Google Scholar
  32. Marks JS, Martin B, Zadoroznyj M (2006) Acceptance of water recycling in Australia: national baseline data. Water 33(2):151–157Google Scholar
  33. Marks J, Martin B, Zadaroznyj M (2008) How Australians order acceptance of recycled water: national baseline data. J Sociol 44:83–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miller GW (2006) Integrated concepts in water reuse: managing global water needs. Desalination 187:65–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nancarrow BE, Leviston Z, Po M, Porter NB, Tucker DI (2008) What drives communities’ decisions and behaviours in the reuse of wastewater. Water Sci Technol 57:485–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nancarrow BE, Leviston Z, Tucker DI (2009) Measuring the predictors of communities’ behavioural decisions for potable reuse of wastewater. Water Sci Technol 60(12):3199–3209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Po M, Kaercher JD, Nancarrow BE (2003) Literature review of factors influencing public perceptions of water reuse. In Water C. L. A. (ed) Technical Report 54/03Google Scholar
  38. Ross VL, Fielding KS, Louis WR (2014) Social trust, risk perceptions and public acceptance of recycled water: testing a social-psychological model. J Environ Manag 137:61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ryan MR, Spash CL, Measham TG (2009) Socio-economic and psychological predictors of domestic greywater and rainwater collection: evidence from Australia. J Hydrol 379:164–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schultz T, Fielding K (2014) The common in-group identity model enhances communication about recycled water. J Environ Psychol 40:296–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Siegrist M, Cousin M-E, Kastenholz H, Wiek A (2007a) Public acceptance of nanotechnology foods and food packaging: the influence of affect and trust. Appetite 49:459–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Siegrist M, Keller C, Kastenholz H, Al E (2007b) Lay people’s and experts’ perceptions of nanotechnology hazards. Risk Anal 27:59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Slovic P, Finucane ML, Peters E, MacGregor DG (2004) Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Anal 24:311–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Theodori GL, Wynveen BJ, Fox WE, Burnett DB (2009) Public perception of desalinated water from oil and gas field operations: data from Texas. Soc Nat Resour 22:674–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vörösmarty CJ, Green P, Salisbury J, Lammers RB (2000) Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 289:284–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ward S, Barr S, Memon F, Butler D (2013) Rainwater harvesting in the UK: exploring water-user perceptions. Urban Water J 10:112–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wu Z, McKay J, Keremane G (2012) Issues affecting community attitudes and intended behaviours in stormwater reuse: a case study of Salisbury, South Australia. Water 4:835–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kelly S. Fielding
    • 1
  • John Gardner
    • 2
  • Zoe Leviston
    • 3
  • Jennifer Price
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute for Social Science ResearchThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.CSIRO Land and WaterEcosciences PrecinctDutton ParkAustralia
  3. 3.CSIRO Land and WaterWembleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations