Water Resources Management

, Volume 31, Issue 2, pp 655–669 | Cite as

Risk-Based Assessment of Drought Mitigation Options: the Case of Syros Island, Greece

  • A. S. Giannikopoulou
  • F. K. Gad
  • E. Kampragou
  • D. Assimacopoulos
Article

Abstract

Drought-related risk estimation is widely acknowledged as a tool towards enhancing drought preparedness and minimizing impacts on people, the economy and the environment. In this paper a method is proposed for the risk-based assessment and prioritisation of long-term drought mitigation options in order to support decision making for drought planning. The assessment combines water balance modelling, hazard analysis, and risk and cost effectiveness analysis. The proposed approach allows an improved understanding of drought-related risks by following a probabilistic analysis of drought impacts under different mitigation options. The method is applied in a drought-prone area with water scarcity problems, the Greek island of Syros. The assessment focuses on agriculture and domestic water use, the two main water using sectors in the island. Six mitigation options are cross-compared in terms of contribution to future drought risk reduction using three criteria: risk, vulnerability and benefit-cost ratio. The results validate the use of risk-based assessment of mitigation options as a valuable tool for improved drought management.

Keywords

Drought risk Vulnerability Impact mitigation Syros Island 

References

  1. Belayneh A, Adamowski J, Khalil B, Ozga-Zielinski B (2014) Long-term SPI drought forecasting in the Awash River Basin in Ethiopia using wavelet neural network and wavelet support vector regression models. J Hydrol 508:418–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Birkmann J (ed) (2006) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards – towards disaster resilient societies. United Nation University Press, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  3. Blaney HF, Criddle WD (1950) Determining water requirements in irrigated area from climatological irrigation data. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Tech. Pap. No. 96, 44 pGoogle Scholar
  4. Blaney HF, Criddle WD (1962) Determining consumptive use and water requirements. USDA, Technical Bull. No. 1275, 59 pGoogle Scholar
  5. Cacciamani C, Morgillo A, Marchesi S, Pavan V (2007) Monitoring and forecasting drought on a regional scale: Emilia-Romagna region. Water Sci Technol Libr 62(1):29–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cancelliere A, Nicolosi V, Rossi G (2009) Assessment of drought risk in water supply systems, In: A. Iglesias et al. (eds) Coping with Drought Risk in Agriculture and Water Supply Systems, Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research 26, Springer, pp 93–109. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9045-5_8
  7. Cubillo F, Garrote L (2008) Drought risk and vulnerability in water supply systems. In: López-Francos A. (ed) Drought management: scientific and technological innovations, Options Méditerranéennes: Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens, n80, Zaragoza: CIHEAM, pp 21 - 27Google Scholar
  8. Dalezios NR, Loukas A, Vasiliades L, Liakopoulos E (2000) Severity-duration-frequency analysis of droughts and wets periods in Greece. Hydrol Sci J 45(5):751–770. doi:10.1080/02626660009492375 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dziegielewski B (2003) Long-term and short-term measures for coping with drought. In: G. Rossi et al. (eds) Tools for drought mitigation in mediterranean regions, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 319–339Google Scholar
  10. Fontaine M, Steinemann A (2009) Assessing vulnerability to natural hazards: impact-based method and application to drought in Washington State. Natural Hazards Review 10(1):11–18. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2009)10:1(11)
  11. Gonzalez-Serrano E, Rodriguez-Mirasol J, Codero T, Koussis A, Rodriguez J (2005) Cost of reclaimed municipal wastewater for applications in seasonally stressed semi-arid regions. J Water Supply Res Technol AQUA 54(6):355–369Google Scholar
  12. Hayes M, Svodoba M, Wilhite D, Vanyarkho O (1999) Monitoring the 1996 drought using the Standardized Precipitation Index. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 80(3):429–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hayes M, Wilhelmi O, Knutson C (2004) Reducing drought risk: bridging theory and practice. Nat Hazards Rev 5(2):106–113. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2004)5:2(106)) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hellenic Ministry of Development (2008) Development of Systems and Tools for Water Resources Management in the Hydrological Department of the Aegean Islands. 2001-2008, AthensGoogle Scholar
  15. Iglesias A, Garrote L, Martin-Carrasco F (2009) Drought risk management in Mediterranean River Basins. Integr Environ Assess Manag 5(1):11–16. doi:10.1897/IEAM_2008-044.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jinno K (1995) Risk assessment of a water supply system during drought. Int J Water Resour Dev 11(2):185–204. doi:10.1080/07900629550042399 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Karavitis CA (1999) Decision support systems for drought management strategies in Metropolitan Athens. Water Int 24(1):10–21. doi:10.1080/02508069908692129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li Y, Ye W, Wang M, Yan X (2009) Climate change and drought: a risk assessment of crop-yield impacts. Clim Res 39:31–46. doi:10.3354/cr00797 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McKee TB, Doesken NJ, Kleist J (1993) The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales. Eighth Conference on Applied Climatology, American Meteorological Society, Jan17-22, 1993, Anaheim CA, pp. 179–184Google Scholar
  20. Merabtene T, Kawamura A, Jinno K, Olsson J (2002) Risk assessment for optimal drought management of an integrated water resources system using a genetic algorithm. Hydrol Process 16:2189–2208. doi:10.1002/hyp.1150 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mishra AK, Desai VR (2006) Drought forecasting using feed-forward recursive neural network. Ecol Model 198(1–2):127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mpezes K (2001) Water Management Study for the Cyclades Complex, Directorate of Technical Services, Prefecture of Cyclades, Syros IslandGoogle Scholar
  23. Papazafeiriou GZ (1999) Crop water requirements. ZITI Publications, ThessalonikiGoogle Scholar
  24. Pizzigalli C, Congedi L, Lionello P, Fahmi AH, Shatanawi M, Chabaane ZL (2011) Climate data analysis in the WASSERMed project. Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 13, EGU2011-8920-1Google Scholar
  25. Pliefke T, Sperbeck ST, Urban M, Peil U, Budelmann H (2007) A Standardized Methodology for Managing Disaster Risk – An Attempt to Remove Ambiguity. The 5th International Probabilistic Workshop, Ghent: ACCO, pp. 283–294Google Scholar
  26. Querner R, van Lanen HAJ (2001) Impact assessment of drought mitigation measures in two adjacent Dutch basins using simulation modelling. J Hydrol 252:51–64. doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00452-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rossi G, Cancelliere A (2013) Managing drought risk in water supply systems in Europe: a review. Int J Water Resour Dev 29(2):272–289. doi:10.1080/07900627.2012.713848 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rossi G, Cancelliere A, Giuliano G (2005) Case Study: Multicriteria Assessment of Drought Mitigation Measures. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, November/ December, 131(6):449–457. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2005)131:6(449)
  29. Rossi G, Castiglione L, Bonaccorso B (2007) Guidelines for planning and implementing drought mitigation measures. SPRINGER VERLAG GMBH, NetherlandsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rossi G, Nicolosi V, Cancelliere A (2008) Strategic water shortage preparedness plan for complex water supply. Eur Water 23(24):13–28Google Scholar
  31. Shahid S, Behrawan H (2008) Drought risk assessment in the western part of Bangladesh. Nat Hazards 46:391–413. doi:10.1007/s11069-007-9191-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith M, Steduto P (2012) Yield response to water: the original FAO water production function. In: Steduto P, Hsiao TC, Fereres E, Raes D (eds) Crop yield response to water, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No66. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome, pp 6–13Google Scholar
  33. Stagge JH, Tallaksen LM, Gudmundsson L, Van Loon AF, Stahl K (2015) Candidate distributions for climatological drought indices (SPI and SPEI). Int J Climatol. doi:10.1002/joc.4267 Google Scholar
  34. Tigkas D (2008) Drought characterization and monitoring in regions of Greece. Eur Water 23(24):29–39Google Scholar
  35. Todisco F, Mannocchi F, Vergni L (2012) Severity–duration–frequency curves in the mitigation of drought impact: an agricultural case study. Nat Hazards. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0446-4 Google Scholar
  36. Tsakiris G (2009) A paradigm for applying risk and hazard concepts in proactive planning. In: Iglesias et al. (eds) Coping with drought risk in agriculture and water supply systems, advances in natural and technological hazards research 26, Springer, pp 81–89. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9045-5_7
  37. Tsakiris G, Vangelis H (2004) Towards a drought watch system based on spatial SPI. Water Resour Manag 18(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. UN/ISDR (2009) Drought risk reduction framework and practices: contributing to the implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action. UNISDR, Geneva, Switzerland & NDMC, Lincoln, Nebraska, U.S.AGoogle Scholar
  39. UNDP (2011) Mainstreaming Drought Risk Management: A primer. UNON Printshop, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  40. Wilhite DA, Hayes MJ, Knutson C, Helm Smith K (2000) Planning for drought: moving from crisis to risk management. J Am Water Resour Assoc 36(4):697–710. doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2000.tb04299.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilhite DA, Svoboda M, Hayes M (2007) Understanding the complex impacts of drought: a key to enhancing drought mitigation and preparedness. Water Resources Management 21:763–774. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9076-5Google Scholar
  42. Wu H, Hubbard KG, Wilhite DA (2004) An agricultural drought risk-assessment model for corn and soybeans. Int J Climatol 24:723–741. doi:10.1002/joc.1028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. S. Giannikopoulou
    • 1
  • F. K. Gad
    • 1
  • E. Kampragou
    • 1
  • D. Assimacopoulos
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Chemical EngineeringNational Technical University of AthensAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations