Water Resources Management

, Volume 29, Issue 9, pp 3227–3242 | Cite as

Noniterative Application of EPANET for Pressure Dependent Modelling Of Water Distribution Systems

  • Mohd Abbas H. Abdy SayyedEmail author
  • Rajesh Gupta
  • Tiku T. Tanyimboh


EPANET 2 has been used previously to simulate pressure-deficient operating conditions in water distribution systems by: (a) executing the algorithm repetitively until convergence is achieved; (b) modifying the source code to cater for pressure-dependent outflows; or (c) incorporating artificial elements e.g., reservoirs in the data input file. This paper describes a modelling approach that enables operating conditions with insufficient pressure to be simulated in a single execution of EPANET 2 without modifying the source code. This is achieved by connecting a check valve, a flow control valve and an emitter to the demand nodes. Thus the modelling approach proposed enhances an earlier formulation by obviating the need for an artificial reservoir at the nodes with insufficient pressure. Consequently the connecting pipe for the artificial reservoir (for which additional data must be provided) is not required. Also, we removed a previous limitation in the modelling of pressure-dependent nodal flows to better reflect the performance of the nodes with insufficient flow and pressure. This yields improved estimates of the available nodal flow and is achieved by simulating pressure-deficient nodal flows with emitters. The emitter discharge equation enables the nodal head-flow relationship to be varied to reflect the characteristics of any network. The procedure lends itself to extended period simulation, especially when carried out with the EPANET toolkit. The merits of the methodology are illustrated on several networks from the literature one of which has 2465 pipes. The results suggest the procedure is robust, reliable and fast enough for regular use.


Water supply Pressure deficient water distribution system Dynamic hydraulic simulation algorithm Extended period simulation Flow control valve Pressure dependent nodal flow functions 


  1. Ackley JRL, Tanyimboh TT, Tahar B, Templeman AB (2001) Head-driven analysis of water distribution systems. International Conference on Computing and Control for the Water Industry, Leicester, pp 3–5Google Scholar
  2. Agrawal ML, Gupta R, Bhave PR (2007) Optimal design of level 1 redundant water distribution networks considering nodal storage. J Environ Eng 133(3):319–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ang WK, Jowitt PW (2006) Solution for water distribution systems under pressure-deficient conditions. J Water Resour Plann Manag 132(3):175–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhave PR (1981) Node flow analysis of water distribution systems. J Transp Eng 107(4):457–467Google Scholar
  5. Bhave PR (1988) Extended period simulation of water systems—direct solution. J Environ Eng 114(5):1146–1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhave PR, Gupta R (2006) Analysis of water distribution networks. Narosa Pub. House Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi, India; and Alpha Science International Ltd., Pangbourne, UKGoogle Scholar
  7. Chandapillai J (1991) Realistic simulation of water distribution systems. J Transp Eng 117(2):258–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ciaponi C, Franchioli L, Murari E, Papiri S (2015) Procedure for defining a pressure-outflow relationship regarding indoor demands in pressure-driven analysis of water distribution networks. Water Resour Manag 29:817–832. doi: 10.1007/s11269-014-0845-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Creaco E, Franchini M, Alvisi S (2010) Optimal placement of isolation valves in water distribution systems based on valve cost and weighted average demand shortfall. Water Resour Manag 24:4317–4338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cross H (1936) Analysis of flow in networks of conduits or conductors. Bulletin No. 286. Univ. of Illinois Engineering Experimental Station, Urbana, pp 1–29Google Scholar
  11. Farmani R, Savic DA, Walters GA (2005) Evolutionary multi-objective optimization in water distribution network design. Eng Optim 37(2):167–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fujiwara O, Ganesharajah T (1993) Reliability assessment of water supply systems with storage and distribution networks. Water Resour Res 29(8):2917–2924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fujiwara O, Li J (1998) Reliability analysis of water distribution networks in consideration of equity, redistribution, and pressure dependent demand. Water Resour Res 34(7):1843–1850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Germanopoulos G (1985) A technical note on the inclusion of pressure dependent demand and leakage terms in water supply network models. Civ Eng Syst 2(3):171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giustolisi O, Laucelli D (2011) Water distribution network pressure-driven analysis using the enhanced global gradient algorithm. J Water Resour Plann Manag 137(6):498–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Giustolisi O, Savic D (2010) Identification of segments and optimal isolation valve system design in water distribution networks. Urban Water 7(1):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Giustolisi O, Savic D, Kapelan Z (2008) Pressure-driven demand and leakage simulation for water distribution networks. J Hydraul Eng 134(5):626–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Giustolisi O, Berardi L, Laucelli D (2014) Modeling local water storages delivering customer demands in WDN models. J Hydraul Eng 140(1):89–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gorev NB, Kodzhespirova IF (2013) Noniterative implementation of pressure-dependent demands using the hydraulic analysis engine of EPANET 2. Water Resour Manag 27(10):3623–3630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gupta R, Bhave PR (1994) Reliability analysis of water distribution systems. J Environ Eng 120(2):447–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gupta R, Bhave PR (1996a) Reliability-based design of water distribution systems. J Environ Eng 122(1):51–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gupta R, Bhave PR (1996b) Comparison of methods for predicting deficient network performance. J Water Resour Plann Manag 122(3):214–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gupta R, Dhapade S, Ganguli S, Bhave PR (2012) Water quality based reliability analysis of water distribution networks. ISH J Hydraul Eng 18(2):80–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Isaacs LT, Mills KG (1980) Linear theory methods for pipe network analysis. J Hydraul Div ASCE 106(7):1191–1201Google Scholar
  25. Islam MS, Sadiq R, Rodriguez MJ, Najjaran H, Hoorfar M (2014) Reliability assessment for water supply systems under uncertainties. J Water Resour Plann Manag 140(4):468–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jinesh Babu KS, Mohan S (2012) Extended period simulation for pressure-deficient water distribution network. J Comput Civ Eng 26(4):498–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jun L, Guoping Y (2013) Iterative methodology of pressure-dependent demand based on EPANET for pressure-deficient water distribution analysis. J Water Resour Plann Manag 139(1):34–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kalungi P, Tanyimboh TT (2003) Redundancy model for water distribution systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 82(3):275–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kovalenko Y, Gorev NB, Kodzhespirova IF, Prokhorov E et al (2014) Convergence of a hydraulic solver with pressure-dependent demands. Water Resour Manag 28:1013–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li PH, Kao JJ (2008) Segment-based vulnerability analysis system for a water distribution network. Civil Eng Environ Syst 25(1):41–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liserra T, Maglionico M, Ciriello V, Di Federico V (2014) Evaluation of reliability indicators for WDSWs with demand-driven and pressure-driven models. Water Resour Manag. doi: 10.1007/s11269-014-0522-5 Google Scholar
  32. Martin DW, Peters G (1963) The application of Newton’s method to network analysis by digital computers. J Inst Water Eng 17(2):115–129Google Scholar
  33. Milan C (2010) Hybrid genetic algorithm and linear programming method for least-cost design of water distribution systems. Water Resour Manag 24(1):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ozger SS, Mays LW (2003) A semi-pressure-driven approach to reliability assessment of water distribution networks. In: Proceedings of 30th IAHR Congress, Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis, Thessaloniki, Greece, 345–352Google Scholar
  35. Rossman LA (2000) EPANET 2 users’ manual. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, CincinnatiGoogle Scholar
  36. Rossman LA (2007) Discussion on ‘Solution for water distribution systems under pressure-deficient conditions’ by WK Ang and PW Jowitt. J Water Resour Plann Manag 133(6):566–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Seyoum AG, Tanyimboh TT (2013) Pressure dependent network water quality modelling. J. Water Management, ICE. doi: 10.1680/wama.12.00118 Google Scholar
  38. Siew C, Tanyimboh TT (2012a) Pressure-dependent EPANET extension. Water Resour Manag 26(6):1477–1498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Siew C, Tanyimboh TT (2012b) Penalty-free feasibility boundary-convergent multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for the optimization of water distribution systems. Water Resour Manag 26(15):4485–4507. doi: 10.1007/s11269-012-0158-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Siew C, Tanyimboh TT, Seyoum AG (2014) Assessment of penalty-free multi-objective evolutionary optimization approach for the design and rehabilitation of water distribution systems. Water Resour Manag 28:373–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Suribabu SR, Neelakantan TR (2011) Balancing reservoir based approach for solution to pressure deficient water distribution networks. Int J Civ Struct Eng 2(2):639–647Google Scholar
  42. Tabesh M, Yekta A, Burrows R (2009) An integrated model to evaluate losses in water distribution systems. Water Resour Manag 23(3):477–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tabesh M, Jamasb M, Moeini R (2011) Calibration of Water distribution hydraulic models: a comparison between pressure dependent and demand driven analysis. Urban Water 8(2):93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tanyimboh TT, Setiadi Y (2008) Joint layout, pipe size and hydraulic reliability optimization of water distribution systems. Eng Optim 40(8):729–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tanyimboh TT, Templeman AB (2010) Seamless pressure-deficient water distribution system model. Proc ICE Water Manag 163(8):389–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tanyimboh T, Tabesh M, Gupta R, Bhave P (1997) Discussion and closure: comparison of methods for predicting deficient-network performance. J Water Resour Plann Manage 123(6):369–370. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1997)123:6(369) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Todini E, Pilati S (1987) A gradient algorithm for the analysis of pipe networks. In: Chun-Hou O, Coulbeck B (eds) Computer applications in water supply: Vol.1-system analysis and simulation. Wiley, London, pp 1–20Google Scholar
  48. Vairagade SA, Abdy Sayyed MAH, Gupta R (2015) Node head flow relationships in skeletonized water distribution networks for predicting performance under deficient conditions. Proc. 17th Water Distribution System Analysis Symposium, World Water and Resour. Congress, Austin, Texas. (Accepted & Scheduled for Oral presentation)Google Scholar
  49. Wagner JM, Shamir U, Marks DH (1988) Water distribution reliability: simulation method. J Water Resour Plann Manage 114(3):276–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wood DJ, Charles COA (1972) Hydraulic network analysis using linear theory. J Hydraul Div 98(7):1157–1170Google Scholar
  51. Wu ZY, Wang RH, Walski TM, Yang SY, Bowdler D, Baggett CC (2009) Extended global-gradient algorithm for pressure-dependent water distribution analysis. J Water Resour Plann Manage 135(1):13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohd Abbas H. Abdy Sayyed
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rajesh Gupta
    • 1
  • Tiku T. Tanyimboh
    • 2
  1. 1.Civil Engineering DepartmentVisvesvaraya National Institute of TechnologyNagpurIndia
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of Strathclyde GlasgowGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations