Advertisement

Water Resources Management

, Volume 29, Issue 8, pp 2563–2579 | Cite as

Implications of Modelled Climate and Land Cover Changes on Runoff in the Middle Route of the South to North Water Transfer Project in China

  • Lingcheng Li
  • Liping ZhangEmail author
  • Jun Xia
  • Christopher James Gippel
  • Renchao Wang
  • Sidong Zeng
Article

Abstract

Sustainable management of water for human uses and maintaining river health requires reliable information about the future availability of water resources. We quantified the separate and combined impacts of climate and land cover changes on runoff for the historical record and for modelled future scenarios in the upper Han River and Luan River, supply and demand zones respectively of the middle route of the South to North Water Transfer Project in China, the world’s largest inter-basin water transfer project. We used a precipitation-runoff model, averaged multiple climate model predictions combined with three emissions scenarios, a combined CA-Markov model to predict land cover change, and a range of statistical tests. Comparing baseline with 2050: climate change would cause an average reduction in runoff of up to 15 % in the upper Han River and up to 9 % in the Luan River catchment; a scenario involving increased forest cover would reduce runoff by up to 0.19 % in the upper Han River and up to 35 % in the Luan River; a scenario involving increased grass cover would increase runoff by up to 0.42 % in the upper Han River and up to 20 % in the Luan River. In the lower Luan River, the mean annual flow after 1998 fell to only 17 % of that of the baseline period, posing a serious threat to river health. This was explained largely by extraction of surface water and groundwater, rather than climate and land use change.

Keywords

Runoff change Climate change Land cover change SWAT model CA-Markov model Water transfer 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the State Key Program of National Natural Science of China (NO. 51339004) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 51279139 and NO. 51279139). The contribution of CJG was supported by the High-End Foreign Expert Recruitment Programme, administered by the State Administration of Foreign Experts Affairs, Central People’s Government of P.R. China. We acknowledge the modeling groups, the Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI) and the WCRP’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling (WGCM) for their roles in making available the WCRP CMIP3 multi-model dataset. Support of this dataset is provided by the Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy.

References

  1. Abbaspour KC (2007) User manual for SWAT-CUP SWAT calibration and uncertainty analysis programs. Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag), DübendorfGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Mukhtar M, Dunger V, Merkel B (2014) Assessing the impacts of climate change on hydrology of the upper reach of the spree river: Germany. Water Resour Manag 28:2731–2749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berkoff J (2003) China: the south–north water transfer project—is it justified? Water Policy 5:1–28Google Scholar
  4. Cao W, Bowden WB, Davie T et al (2009) Modelling impacts of land cover change on critical water resources in the Motueka River catchment, New Zealand. Water Resour Manag 23(1):137–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiew FHS, McMahon TAM (1993) Detection of trend or change in annual flow of Australian rivers. Int J Climatol 13:643–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiew FHS, Siriwardena L (2005) Trend, trend/change detection software, user guide. CRC for Catchment Hydrology, University of Melbourne, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  7. Eastman JR (2001) IDRISI 32 release 2, guide to GIS and image processing volumes 1 and 2. Clark Labs, Clark University, WorcesterGoogle Scholar
  8. Foley AM (2010) Uncertainty in regional climate modelling: a review. Prog Phys Geog 34(5):647–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gassman PW, Reyes MR, Green CH et al (2007) The soil and water assessment tool historical development, applications, and future research directions. Trans ASABE 50(4):1211–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guan DJ, Li HF, Inohae T et al (2011) Modeling urban land use change by the integration of cellular automaton and Markov model. Ecol Model 222(20–22):3761–3772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hao J (2007) Analysis on causation and countermeasure of incoming runoff decrease for Panjiakou Reservoir. Water Resour Hydropower En 38(16):8–11 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. IPCC-SRES (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios. In: Nakićenović N, Swart R (eds) A special report of working group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. IPCC-TGICA (2007) General guidelines on the use of scenario data for climate impact and adaptation assessment. Version 2. Prepared by TR Carter on behalf of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Task Group on Data and Scenario Support for Impact and Climate Assessment, 66 ppGoogle Scholar
  14. Lambin EF, Turner BL, Geist HJ et al (2001) The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 11(4):261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li JZ, Feng P (2007) Runoff variations in the Luanhe River Basin during 1952-2002. J Geogr Sci 17(3):339–350. doi: 10.1007/s11442-007-0339-8
  16. Li BS, Zhou PJ, Wang XU et al (2013) Opportunities and eco-environmental influence of cascade hydropower development and water diversion projects in Hanjiang River Basin. J Geol Soc India 82:692–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liao YM (2013) Change of parameters of BCCRCG-WG for daily non-precipitation variables in China 1951–1978 and 1979–2007. J Geogr Sci 23(4):579–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meehl GA, Covey C, Delworth T et al (2007) The WCRP CMIP3 multi-model dataset: a new era in climate change research. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 88:1383–1394. doi: 10.1175/BAMS-88-9-1383 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Merz R, Parajka J, Blöschl G (2011) Time stability of catchment model parameters: implications for climate impact analyses. Water Resour Res 47(2), W02531. doi: 10.1029/2010WR009505 Google Scholar
  20. Murphy JM, Sexton DM, Barnett DN et al (2004) Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature 430(7001):768–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Narsimlu B, Gosain AK, Chahar BR (2013) Assessment of future climate change impacts on water resources of upper sind river basin, India using SWAT model. Water Resour Manag 27(10):3647–3662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Peisert C, Sternfeld E (2005) Quenching Beijing’s thirst: the need for integrated management for the endangered Miyun Resevoir. China Environment Series 7:33–46Google Scholar
  23. Rees WG (2008) Comparing the spatial content of thematic maps. Int J Remote Sens 29(13):3833–3844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sen PK (1968) Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall’s tau. J Am Stat Assoc 39:1379–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Shi FF, Huang W (2009) Ecological impacts of the Danjiangkou Reservoir on the middle and lower reaches of the Han River. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin 18(10):954–958 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  26. Shi P, Ma X, Hou Y et al (2013) Effects of land-use and climate change on hydrological processes in the Upstream of Huai River, China. Water Resour Manag 27(5):1263–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tianjin Water Supply Bureau (2000–2010) Water resources bulletin of Tianjin, for years 2000 to 2010. Tianjin Water Supply Bureau, Tianjin CityGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang SM (2011) The impact of inter-basin water supply on sustainability of social and economic development in Tianjin and Tangshan—a case study of the Luan River Diversion project. In Proceedings, Conference of Chinese Environmental Science Institute, November, Vol. 1: 286–291 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  29. Wang W, Yang XH, Wang YT (2009) Ecological water requirements in the lower reaches of the Luanhe River Basin. Adv Water Sci 20:560–565 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  30. Xia J, Zhang L, Liu C et al (2007) Towards better water security in North China. Water Resour Manag 21(1):233–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Xu Y, Gao XJ, Giorgi F (2010) Upgrades to the reliability ensemble averaging method for producing probabilistic climate-change projections. Clim Res 41(1):61–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yan DH, Wang G, Wang H et al (2012) Assessing ecological land use and water demand of river systems: a case study in Luanhe River, North China. Hydrol Earth Syst Sc 16:2469–2483. doi: 10.5194/hess-16-2469-2012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yang YH, Tian F (2009) Abrupt change of runoff and its major driving factors in Haihe River Catchment, China. J Hydrol 374(3–4):373–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yang H, Zehnder AJB (2005) The south–north water transfer project in China. Water Int 30(3):339–349. doi: 10.1080/02508060508691874 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhang QF (2009) The south-to-north water transfer project of China: environmental implications and monitoring strategy. J Am Water Resour As 45(5):1238–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhang Z, Dawes WR, Walker GR (2001) Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water Resour Res 37(3):701–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang C, Ren J, Gao X et al (2008) Study on two-part water price model for water diversion project from Luanhe River to Tianjin. China Water Wastewater 24(4):72–75 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  38. Zhang LP, Qin LL, Yang Z et al (2012) Climate change impacts on hydrological processes in the water source area of the middle route of the south-to-north water diversion project. Water Int 37(5SI):564–584Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lingcheng Li
    • 1
    • 3
  • Liping Zhang
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Jun Xia
    • 1
    • 3
  • Christopher James Gippel
    • 4
  • Renchao Wang
    • 1
  • Sidong Zeng
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering ScienceWuhan UniversityWuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.College of Tourism Culture and Geographical ScienceHuanggang Normal UniversityHuanggangPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.Hubei Collaborative Innovation Center for Water Resources SecurityWuhan UniversityWuhanPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Australian Rivers InstituteGriffith UniversityNathanAustralia

Personalised recommendations